Skip to main content

Innovation und Kreativität in Projekten

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Neue Produkte und Dienstleistungen werden heutzutage kaum noch von Einzelnen „erfunden“, sondern meistens von Projektteams erarbeitet. Inzwischen liegt eine ganze Reihe von Befunden darüber vor, welche gruppenbezogenen Faktoren die Innovativität von Projektteams beeinflussen, welche für die Projektpraxis bedeutsam sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). Amodel of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. & King, N. (1993). Innovation in organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol.8, pp. 1–34). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. & West, M. (1996). The team climate inventory: Development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C. & Maier, G. W. (2001). Das Teamklima-Inventar (TKI) für Innovation in Gruppen: Psychometrische Überprüfung an einer deutschen Stichprobe. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 45, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C, Anderson, N. R. & West, M. (2000). Das Teamklima-Inventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caird, S. (1994). How do award winners come up with innovative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 3, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2007). Psychologie der Innovationsgenerierung. In D. Frey & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Wirtschaftspsychologie (S. 783–808). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Hartcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. R. & Salgado, J. F. (im Druck). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasof, J. (1995). Social determinants of creativity: Status expectations and the evaluation of original products. Advances in Group Processes, 12, 167–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, M. A. A. M. & Wierenga, B. (2002). The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L. & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, G. W., Streicher, B., Jonas, E. & Frey, D. (2007). Kreativität und Innovation. In D. Frey & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Wirtschaftspsychologie (S. 809–855). Stuttgart: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P., Cozzens, M. & Contractor, N. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3, 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D. & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C. & van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Funke, U., Moser, K. & Donat, M. (1995). Personalauswahl in Forschung und Entwicklung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vegt, G. & van de Vliert, E. (2002). Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vegt, G., Emans, B. & van de Vliert, E. (1999). Effects of interdependencies in project teams. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A. & Bass, B. M. (1991). Transformational leadership at different phases of the innovation process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of creativity. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp.309–333). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maier, G.W., Hülsheger, U.R. (2009). Innovation und Kreativität in Projekten. In: Angewandte Psychologie für Projektmanager. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88382-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics