Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

A Computational Approach to Digital Chinese Painting and Calligraphy pp 23–45Cite as

Computer Science in Paintings or Drawings

  • Chapter

  • 941 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China ((ATSTC))

Abstract

What is digital painting? Wikipedia offers an easy definition [Wik07]: “Digital painting is an emerging art form in which traditional painting techniques such as watercolor, oils, impasto, etc. are applied using digital tools by means of a computer, a digitizing tablet and stylus, and software.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christopher G. Atkeson, Andrew W. Moore, and Stefan Schaal. Locally weighted learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(1–5):11–73, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deborah F. Berman, Jason T. Bartell, and David H. Salesin. Multiresolution painting and compositing. In SIGGRAPH’ 94: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 85–90, 1994.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. [BKR+05]_Michael Burns, Janek Klawe, Szymon Rusinkiewicz, Adam Finkelstein, and Doug DeCarlo. Line drawings from volume data. In SIGGRAPH’ 05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press, pages 512–518, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Debra Dooley and Michael F. Cohen. Automatic illustration of 3D geometric models: lines. In SI3D’ 90: Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, pages 77–82, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Debra Dooley and Michael F. Cohen. Automatic illustration of 3D geometric models: surfaces. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(2):307–314, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doug DeCarlo, Adam Finkelstein, and Szymon Rusinkiewicz. Interactive rendering of suggestive contours with temporal coherence. In NPAR’ 04: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and Rendering, Annecy, France: ACM Press, pages 15–145, 2004.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Doug DeCarlo, Adam Finkelstein, Szymon Rusinkiewicz, and Anthony Santella. Suggestive contours for conveying shape. In SIGGRAPH’ 03: ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers, San Diego, CA, USA: ACM Press, pages 848–855, 2003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliver Deussen and Thomas Strothotte. Computer-generated pen-and-ink illustration of trees. In SIGGRAPH’ 00: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 13–18, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Doug DeCarlo and Anthony Santella. Stylization and abstraction of photographs. In SIGGRAPH’ 02: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and, Interactive Techniques, San Antonio, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 769–776, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. William T. Freeman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Egon C. Pasztor. Learning style translation for the lines of a drawing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 22(1):33–46, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce Gooch and Amy Gooch. Non-Photorealistic Rendering. A K Peters, Ltd., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amy Gooch, Bruce Gooch, Peter Shirley, and Elaine Cohen. A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration. In SIGGRAPH’ 98: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 447–452, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul Haeberli. Paint by numbers: abstract image representations. In SIGGRAPH’ 90: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Dallas, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 207–214, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Aaron Hertzmann. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. In SIGGRAPH’ 98: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 453–460, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Aaron Hertzmann. Paint by relaxation. In CGI’ 01: Computer Graphics International 2001, pages 47–54, Hong Kong, China: IEEE Computer Society, 2001. Also NYU Computer Science Technical Report, May 2000, NYU CS TR2000–801.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Aaron Hertzmann. Fast paint texture. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and Rendering (NPAR), Annecy, France: ACM Press, pages 91–97, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aaron Hertzmann. Tutorial: a survey of stroke-based rendering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 23(4):70–81, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aaron Hertzmann and Ken Perlin. Painterly rendering for video and interaction. In NPAR’ 00: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and, Rendering, Annecy, France: ACM Press, pages 7–12, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Aaron Hertmnann and Denis Zorin. Illustrating smooth surfaces. In SIGGRAPH’ 00: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 517–526, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Victoria Interrante, Henry Fuchs, and Stephen Pizer. Enhancing transparent skin surfaces with ridge and valley lines. In VIS’ 95: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Visualization, Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, page 52, 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Tbbias Isenberg, Nick Halper, and Thomas Strothotte. Stylizing silhouettes at interactive rates: from silhouette edges to silhouette strokes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics), 21(3):249–258, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee A. Iverson and Steven W. Zucker. Logical/linear operators for image curves. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(10):982–996, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tilke Judd, Fredo Durand, and Edward Adelson. Apparent ridges for line drawing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 26(3):19, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robert D. Kalnins, Philip L. Davidson, Lee Markosian, and Adam Finkelstein. Coherent stylized silhouettes. In SIGGRAPH’ 03: ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers, San Diego, CA, USA: ACM Press, pages 856–861, 2003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. [KMN+99]_Michael A. Kowalski, Lee Markosian, Northrup J.D., Lubomir Bourdev, Ronen Barzel, Loring S. Holden, and John F. Hughes. Art-based rendering of fur, grass, and trees. In SIGGRAPH’ 99: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 433–438, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Richard Lengagne, Pascal Fua, and Olivier Monga. Using crest lines to guide surface reconstruction from stereo. In ICPR’ 96: Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vienna, Austria: IEEE Computer Society, volume I, page 9, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tony Lindeberg. Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peter Litwinowicz. Processing images and video for an impressionist effect. In SIGGRAPH’ 97: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 407–414, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. John Lansdown and Simon Schofield. Expressive rendering: a review of nonphotorealistic techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(3):29–37, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barbara J. Meier. Painterly rendering for animation. In SIGGRAPH’ 96: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press, pages 477–484, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. [MKG+97]_Lee Markosian, Michael A. Kowalski, Daniel Goldstein, Samuel J. Trychin, John F. Hughes, and Lubomir D. Bourdev. Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering. In SIGGRAPH’ 97: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 415–420, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. J.D. Northrup and Lee Markosian. Artistic silhouettes: a hybrid approach. In NPAR’ 00: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and Rendering, Annecy, France: ACM Press, pages 31–37, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Ken Perlin and Luiz Velho. A wavelet representation for unbounded resolution painting. Technical Report, New York University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Michael P. Salisbury, Sean E. Anderson, Ronen Barzel, and David H. Salesin. Interactive pen-and-ink illustration. In SIGGRAPH’ 94: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 101–108, 1994.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas Strothotte and Stefan Schlechtweg. Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics: Modeling, Rendering and Animation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jutta Schumann, Thomas Strothotte, Stefan Laser, and Andreas Raab. Assessing the effect of non-photorealistic rendered images in CAD. In CHI’ 96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada: ACM Press, pages 35–41, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Takafumi Saito and Tokiichiro Takahashi. Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes. in SIGGRAPH’ 90: Proceedings of the 17st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Dallas, TX, USA: ACM Press, pages 197–206, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Carsten Steger. Subpixel-precise extraction of watersheds. In ICCV’ 99: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkira, Greece: IEEE Computer Society, volume 2, page 884, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Michael P. Salisbury, Michael T. Wong, John F. Hughes, and David H. Salesin. Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration. In SIGGRAPH’ 97: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pages 401–406, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Georges Winkenbach and David H. Salesin. Computer-generated pen-and-ink illustration. In SIGGRAPH’ 94: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, USA: ACM Press, pages 91–100, 1994.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Georges Winkenbach and David H. Salesin. Rendering parametric surfaces in pen and ink. In SIGGRAPH’ 96: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM Press, pages 469–476, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. John C. Whelan and Mahes Visvalingam. Formulated silhouettes for sketching terrain. In Proceedings of Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, Birmingham, UK: Eurographics Association, pages 90–97, 2003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Songhua Xu, Francis C.M. Lau, Hao Jiang, and Yunhe Pan. A novel method for fast and high-quality rendering of hair. In EGSR’06: Proceedings of the 17th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, Nicosia, Cyprus: ACM Siggraph and Eurographics Association, pages 331–341 & 440, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Computer Science in Paintings or Drawings. In: A Computational Approach to Digital Chinese Painting and Calligraphy. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88148-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88148-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88147-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88148-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation