Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Using Echocardiography and Doppler

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hemodynamic Monitoring Using Echocardiography in the Critically Ill

Abstract

Cardiac output measurement is of prime importance in the hemodynamic assessment of patients with circulatory failure. It helps distinguish the different types of shock and, more importantly, is crucial in discriminating between cardiac dysfunction and failure and also in evaluating the impact of various interventions.

Different methods can be used to measure cardiac output or, more precisely, stroke volume since cardiac output is the product of stroke volume and heart rate. Stroke volume is probably more important as changes in heart rate (adaptive or in response to drugs) may occur. For example, it is important to establish whether the increase in cardiac output during dobutamine administration is related to an increase in stroke volume (and thus contractility) or to a change in heart rate since the implications for the benefits of the intervention may differ.

In practice, measurement of left ventricular outflow tract diameter with two-dimensional imaging (parasternal, long-axis) and flow with pulsed Doppler (apical five-chamber view) is the best-validated technique. It can verify where there is any significant aortic regurgitation or stenosis. When these techniques cannot be implemented, others can be used, though they may be less reliable or more difficult to conduct in critically ill patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H et al (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guyton AC, Lindsey AW, Abernathy B, Richardson T (1957) Venous return at various right atrial pressures and the normal venous return curve. Am J Physiol 189:609–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guyton AC, Guyton AC (1992) Overview of the circulation; medical physics of pressure, flow, resistance, and vascular compliance. In: Human physiology and mechanisms of disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 110–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guyton AC, Abernathy B, Langston JB, Kaufmann BN, Fairchild HM (1959) Relative importance of venous and arterial resistances in controlling venous return and cardiac output. Am J Physiol 196:1008–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cholley B (2008) Fluids: replace or restrict? In: Kuhlen R, Moreno R, Ranieri M, Rhodes A (eds) Controversies in critical care. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 457–3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magder S (2006) The classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct. J Appl Physiol 101:1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sylvester JT, Goldberg HS, Permutt S (1983) The role of the vasculature in the regulation of cardiac output. Clin Chest Med 4:111–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA (1984) Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation 70:425–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moulinier L, Venet T, Schiller NB, Kurtz TW, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A (1991) Measurement of aortic blood flow by Doppler echocardiography: day to day variability in normal subjects and applicability in clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:1326–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robson SC, Murray A, Peart I, Heads A, Hunter S (1988) Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 59:680–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weyman AE, Griffin B (1994) Left ventricular outflow tract: the aortic valve, aorta, and subvalvular outflow tract. In: Weyman AE (ed) Principles and practice of echocardiography. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 498–574

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huntsman LL, Stewart DK, Barnes SR, Franklin SB, Colocousis JS, Hessel EA (1983) Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man: clinical validation. Circulation 67:593–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz WE, Gasior TA, Quinlan JJ, Gorcsan J 3rd (1993) Transgastric continuous-wave Doppler to determine cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 71:853–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Darmon PL, Hillel Z, Mogtader A, Mindich B, Thys D (1994) Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography using continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve. Anesthesiology 80:796–805, discussion 25A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoddard MF, Prince CR, Ammash N, Goad JL, Vogel RL (1993) Pulsed Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic determination of cardiac output in human beings: comparison with thermodilution technique. Am Heart J 126:956–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Descorps-Declere A, Smail N, Vigue B et al (1996) Transgastric, pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of cardiac output. Intensive Care Med 22:34–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shiran A, Adawi S, Ganaeem M, Asmer E (2009) Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurement using transthoracic when compared with transesophageal echocardiography in systole and diastole. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:319–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Axler O, Megarbane B, Lentschener C, Fernandez H (2003) Comparison of cardiac output measured with echocardiographic volumes and aortic Doppler methods during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 29:208–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M (2008) A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 109:723–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A et al (2009) Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 37:2570–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL (2009) Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 110:1092–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ et al (2009) The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 22:22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75908, Paris cedex 15, France

    Bernard P. Cholley

Authors
  1. Bernard P. Cholley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard P. Cholley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Intenisve Care, Erasme University Hospital, route de Lennik 808, Bruxelles, 1070, Belgium

    Daniel de Backer

  2. Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, rue Ambroise Paré 2, Paris CX 10, 75475, France

    Bernard P. Cholley

  3. , Unité de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Avenue Laennec, Amiens Cedex 1, 80054, France

    Michel Slama

  4. Ambroise Paré, Intensive Care & Reanimation Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, avenue Charles de Gaulle 9, Boulogne Cedex, 92104, France

    Antoine Vieillard-Baron

  5. Hôpital Dupuytren, Dépt. Soin Intensive, Université de Limoges, avenue Martin Luther King 2, Limoges, 87042, France

    Philippe Vignon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cholley, B.P. (2011). Measurement of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output Using Echocardiography and Doppler. In: de Backer, D., Cholley, B., Slama, M., Vieillard-Baron, A., Vignon, P. (eds) Hemodynamic Monitoring Using Echocardiography in the Critically Ill. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87956-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87956-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87954-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87956-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation