Skip to main content

Critical Information Infrastructures: Should Models Represent Structures or Functions?

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5219))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The common approaches to modeling and analyzing complex socio-technical systems, of which Critical Information Infrastructures is one example, assumes that they can be completely specified. The methods emphasize how systems are composed or structured and how component failures propagate. Since socio-technical systems always are underspecified, they cannot be analyzed in the same way. The alternative is to focus on their functions, and how the variability of functions can combine to create non-linear effects. An example of that is the Functional Resonance Analysis method (FRAM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Perrow, C.: Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Finkelstein, A., Dowell, J.: A comedy of errors: the London Ambulance Service case study. In: Proc. 8th International Workshop on Software Specification & Design IWSSD-8, pp. 2–4. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Albrechtsen, E., Hovden, J.: Industrial safety management and information security management: risk characteristics and management approaches. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conant, R.C., Ashby, W.R.: Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science 1(2), 89–97 (1970)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollnagel, E.: Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mercadier, V.: When incident command system fails. University of Berkeley, Berkely (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nouvel, D., Travadel, S., Hollnagel, E.: Introduction of the concept of functional resonance in the analysis of a near-accident in aviation. In: 33rd ESReDA Seminar: Future challenges of accident investigation, Ispra, Italy, November 13-14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hollnagel, E. (2008). Critical Information Infrastructures: Should Models Represent Structures or Functions?. In: Harrison, M.D., Sujan, MA. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87698-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87698-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87697-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87698-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics