Skip to main content

Quantitative Interpretation

  • Chapter
Gravity Interpretation

Quantitative interpretation means quantification of qualitative models. “Qualitative” is not “purely qualitative”. All models are approximate estimates. There is no clear distinction between “qualitative” and “quantitative”. “Quantitative” is never “absolutely accurate” or error-free, and model parameters must be complemented by their error bounds. What is considered sufficiently accurate depends on the study aims, data situation, numerical realisation etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baranov, V.: Sur le calcul de l’influence gravimétrique des structures définies par les isobathes. Geophys. Prosp., 1, 36–43, 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosum, W.: Anlage und Interpretation aeromagnetischer Vermessungen im Rahmen der Erzexploration. Geol. Jahrbuch., E20, 63pp., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çavşak, H.: Dichtemodell für den mitteleuropäischen Abschnitt der EGT aufgrund der gemeinsamen Inversion von Geoid, Schwere und refraktionsseismisch ermittelter Krustenstruktur. Ph.D. thesis [unpubl.], Mainz, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorova, T., Jacoby, W.R., Wallner, H.: Crust-mantle transition and Moho model for Iceland and surroundings from seismic, topography, and gravity data. Tectonophysics, 396, 119–140, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulger, G.R., Pritchard, M.J., Julian, B.R., Evans, J.R., Allen, R.M., Nolet, G., Morgan, W.J., Bergsson, B.H., Erlendsson, P., Jakobsdottir, S., Ragnarsson, S., Stefansson, R., Vogfjord K.: The seismic anomaly beneath Iceland extends down to the mantle transition zone and no deeper. Geophys. J. Int., 142, 1–9, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goguel, J.: Calcul de l’attraction d’un polygone horizontal de densité uniforme. Geophys. Prosp., 9, 116–127, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, A., Bosum, W.: Geomagnetics – Selected Examples and Case Histories. Geoexploration Monographs 1/10, Borntraeger, Berlin, 166pp., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götze, H.-J., Lahmeyer, B.: Application of three-dimensional interactive modeling in gravity and magnetics. Geophysics, 53, 1096–1108, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, H.: Gravimagnetic similarity in anomaly formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics, 67, 1126–1138, 2002a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, H.: Invariance in gravimagnetric similarity in anomaly formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics, 67, 1134–1137, 2002b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, H., Schürholz, P., Starr, A.J., Chakraborti, M.: Comparison of gravimetric formulas for uniform polyhedra. Geophysics, 64, 1438–1446, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.: Schweremessungen auf Helgoland – Auswertung mit Ausgleichsverfahren. Z. Geophysik, 32, 340–351, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.: Zur Berechnung der Schwerewirkung beliebig geformter Massen mit digitalen Rechenmaschinen. Z. Geophysik, 33, 163–166, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.R.: Instability in the upper mantle and global plate movements. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 5671–5680, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.R.: Velocity-density systematics from seismic and gravity data. Veröff. Zentr. Inst. Phys. Erde, Nr. 31, 323–333, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.: Lateral density variations and isostasy – or isostasy with balance of torques. Geoskrifter 10, Aarhus University, 75–93, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.R., Wallner, H., Smilde, P.: Tektonik und Vulkanismus entlang der Messel Störungszone auf dem Sprendlinger Horst: Geophysikalische Ergebnisse. Z. dt. Geol. Ges., 151, 493–510, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.R., Mertz, D., Wallner, H.: Students’ field research extends knowledge of origin of a UNESCO world heritage site in Germany. EOS Transactions Am. Geophys. Union., 84, 39, 393, 396–397, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W.R., Çavşak, H.: Inversion of gravity anomalies over spreading oceanic ridges. J. Geodynamics, 39, 461–474, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W., Weigel, W., Fedorova, T.: Crustal structure of Reykjanes Ridge near 62°N, on the basis of seismic refraction and gravity data. J. Geodynamics, 43, 55–72, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K.: Schwerkraftverfahren in der Angewandten Geophysik. Akad. Verlagsges. Geest & Portig, Leipzig, 348pp., 1961 [KJ61].

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubersheimer, F.: Vermessung magnetischer Anomalien über ölschieferbecken bei Messel: quantitativer Vergleich verschiedener Vorkommen auf dem Sprendlinger Horst. Master’s thesis [unpubl.], Mainz, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D.P.: Surface deformation, gravity anomalies, and convection. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 48, 211–238, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montelli, R., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F.A., Masters, G., Engdahl, E.R., Hung, S.H.: Finite-frequency tomography reveals a variety of plumes in the mantle. Science, 303, 338–343. PMID 14657505, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, C.: Gravimetrische Untersuchung zur Frage der Genese von “Messel”. Diploma thesis [unpubl.], Mainz, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolet, G., Karato, S., Montelli, R.: Plume fluxes from seismic tomography (abstract). Geophys. Research Abstracts, 7, 04221, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodehl, C., Mueller, St., Haak, V.: The European Cenozoic rift system. In “Continental Rifts: Evolution, Structure, Tectonics”, ed. K.H. Olsen, 133–212, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 466pp., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, G., Turcotte, D.L.: Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets. Cambridge Univ. Press, 940pp., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebazungu, E.: Investigations of maar diatreme volcanoes by inversion of magnetic and gravity data from the Eifel area in Germany. PhD thesis [unp‘ubl.], Mainz, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailhac, P., Gibert, D.: Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Two-dimensional wavelets and multipolar approximations. J. Geophys. Res., 108, B5, 2262, doi:10.1029/2002JB002021, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilde, P.L.: Verwendung und Bewertung von a priori Information bei potentiell singulären Inversionsproblemen am Beispiel der gravimetrischen Bestimmung von Dichteverteilungen. Deutsche Geodät. Komm., C 490, München, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwani, M., Ewing, M.: Rapid computation of gravitational attraction of three-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape. Geophysics, 25, 203–225, 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwani, M., Worzel, J.L., Landisman, M.: Rapid gravity computations for two-dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zone. J. Geophys. Res., 64, 49–59, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C.J., Bjarnason, I.Th., VanDecar, J.C., Solomon, S.C.: Seismic structure of the Iceland mantle plume. Nature, 385, 245–247, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johannes, W.J., Smilde, P.L. (2009). Quantitative Interpretation. In: Gravity Interpretation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85329-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics