Skip to main content

MLEM2 Rule Induction Algorithms: With and Without Merging Intervals

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 118))

Summary

The MLEM2 algorithm is a rule induction algorithm in which rule induction, discretization, and handling missing attribute values are all conducted simultaneously. In this paper two versions of the MLEM2 algorithm are compared: the first version of MLEM2 induces rules that may contain two conditions with the same numerical attribute and different intervals. The second version of MLEM2 induces rules with merged conditions associated with numerical attributes, i.e., all conditions are related to different attributes. For completeness, experiments on the original LEM algorithm with discretization as a preprocessing are also included. The performance, in terms of accuracy, for all three algorithms is approximately the same (for any two of them the difference in performance is not statistically significant).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booker LB, Goldberg DE, and Holland JF (1990) Classifier systems and genetic algorithms. In: Carbonell JG (ed.) Machine learning. Paradigms and methods. MIT, Menlo Park, CA, 235–282

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chmielewski MR, Grzymala-Busse JW (1996) Global discretization of continuous attributes as preprocessing for machine learning, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15: 319–331

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fayyad UM, Irani KB (1992) On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation, Machine Learning 8: 87–102

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Grzymala-Busse JW (1992) LERS – A system for learning from examples based on rough sets. In: Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support. Handbook of applications and advances of the rough set theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grzymala-Busse JW (1997) A new version of the rule induction system LERS, Fundamenta Informaticae 31: 27–39

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Grzymala-Busse JW (2002) Discretization of numerical attributes. In: Kloesgen W, Zytkow J (eds) Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery, Oxford University Press, New York, 218–225

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grzymala-Busse JW (2002) MLEM2: A new algorithm for rule induction from imperfect data. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, IPMU 2002, July 1–5, Annecy, France, 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grzymala-Busse JW (2004) Three strategies to rule induction from data with numerical attributes, Transactions on Rough Sets, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Journal Subline, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2: 54–62

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grzymala-Busse JW, Stefanowski J (2001) Three discretization methods for rule induction, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 16: 29–38

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Grzymala-Busse JW, Hsiao TY (1998) Dropping conditions in rules induced by ID3. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Rough Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing RSDMGrC’98 at the 4th Joint Conference on Information Sciences (JCIS’98), October 1998, Research Triangle Park, NC, 351–354

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamburg M (1983) Statistical Analysis for Decision Making. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York 546–550 and 721

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE (1986) Induction. Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. MIT, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11: 341–356

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grzymala-Busse, J.W. (2008). MLEM2 Rule Induction Algorithms: With and Without Merging Intervals. In: Lin, T.Y., Xie, Y., Wasilewska, A., Liau, CJ. (eds) Data Mining: Foundations and Practice. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78488-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78488-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78487-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78488-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics