Skip to main content

Neural Underpinnings of Risk Handling, Developing Preference and Choosing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuromarketing
  • 5703 Accesses

Abstract

For centuries, the mind and heart were, respectively, used as metaphors for reason and emotions. Typically juxtaposed one against the other, they were meant to express the contrast between the methodical thinking and spontaneous emotions as guiding mechanisms for human behavior, including consumption. In the real life, both blend together to form a decisional mix. Even if people pride themselves for being rational and logical, they still cannot defuse the emotions (as in passing/failing the lie detector test).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). Why good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H., & Brown, L. L. (2008, November). Neural correlates of long-term pair-bonding in a sample of intensely in-love humans. Poster presentation 297.10/TT28, Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman, J. M., Watson, K. K., Tetreault, N. A., & Hakeem, A. Y. (2005). Intuition and autism: A possible role for von economo neurons. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2006). Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Sparks, E. A., & Vohs, K. D. (2007a). Free will in consumer behavior: Rational choice and self-control. In K. D. Vohs, R. F. Baumeister, & G. Loewenstein (Eds.), Do emotions help or hurt decision making? A Hedgefoxian Perspective. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189–2202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R., Seo, J. Y., & Li, E. (2007). Dirty little secret: Home chaos and professional organizers. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 10, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti, F., Lanotte, M., Lopiano, L., & Colloca, L. (2007). When words are painful: Unraveling the mechanisms of the Nocebo effect. Neuroscience, 142, 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G. S. (2005b). Price, placebo, and the brain. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, G., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., & Noussair, C. (2008, October). Neural mechanisms of social influence in consumer decisions. Paper presented at Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, K., Marsh, A., Morton, J., Vythilingam, M., Jones, M., Mondillo, K., et al. (2006). Choosing the lesser of two evils, the better of two goods: Specifying the roles of ventromedial prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate in object choice. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11379–11386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt, H., & Luis Pinto-Prades, J.-L. (2009). New evidence of preference reversals in health utility measurement. Health Economics, 18, 713–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, C., Schoenberg, S. O., Reiser, M. F., Meindl, T. M., & Poeppel, E. (2006, November). Brand perception – Evaluation of cortical activation using fMRI. Conference Paper, Radiological Society of North America 2006 Meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-LaTour, K., & LaTour, M. S. (2005). Transforming consumers experience: When timing matters. Journal of Advertising, 34, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in the desirability of choice alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camille, N., Coricelli, G., Sallet, J., Pradat-Diehl, P., Duhamel, J.-R., & Sirigu, A. (2004). The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret. Science, 304, 1167–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Guido, G. (2001). Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit? Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, E., & Canli, T. (2005). The endophenotype of impulsivity: Reaching consilience through behavioral Genetic, and neuroimaging approaches. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 262–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coricelli, G., Critchley, H. D., Joffily, M., O’Doherty, J. P., Sirgu, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Regret and its avoidance: A neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1255–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coricelli, G., Dolan, R. J., & Sirigu, A. (2007). Brain, emotion and decision making: The paradigmatic exampleof regret. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Tabibnia, G., Lieberman, M. D., & Robbins, T. W. (2008). Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science, 320, 1739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W., Van Bavel, J., & Johnsen, I. (2008). Affective flexibility: Evaluative processing goals shape amygdala activity. Psychological Science, 19, 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Argembeau, A. (2007). Facial expressions of emotion influence memory for facial identity in an automatic way. Emotion, 7, 507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Argembeau, A., & van der Linden, M. (2008). Remembering pride and shame: Self-enhancement and the phenomenology of autobiographical memory. Memory, 16, 538–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (2004). Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Available from http://www.sss.ias.edu.

  • De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kramer, J., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., et al. (2005a). Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: Bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., & Kenning, P. (2005b). Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making. Journal of Neuroimaging, 15, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Pieper, A., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., et al. (2007). Anterior cingulate reflects susceptibility to framing during attractiveness evaluation. Neuroreport., 18, 1119–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmeules, D. (2002). The impact of variety on consumer happiness: Marketing and the tyranny of freedom. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6, 1–33. http://www.amsreview.org/articles/desmeules12-2002.pdf (12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. (2002). The role of learning in motivation. In C. R. Gallistel (Ed.), Learning, motivation, and emotion (pp. 497–533). New York NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311(5763), 1005–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., van Baaren, R. B., Bongers, K. C. A., Bos, M. W., van Leeuwen, M. L., & van der Leij, A. (2008). The rational unconscious: Conscious versus unconscious thought in complex consumer choice. In M. Wanke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuele, E., Politi, P., Bianchi, M., Minoretti, P., Bertona, M., & Geroldi, D. (2006). Raised plasma nerve growth factor levels associated with early-stage romantic love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 288–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. E. (2007). Thinking about conditionals: A study of individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1772–1784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, L. K. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of human decision making: a review and conceptual framework. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Mukherji, A. (2006). Can we really observe hyperbolic discounting? Mimeo, March 18, 2006, from http://www.econ.upenn.edu/~jesusfv/hyper2006.pdf

  • Fisher, H. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate choice. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 87–110). New Haven, CT: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., et al. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318, 1305–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. (2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuens, M., Weijters, B., & De Wulf, K. (2009). A new measure of brand personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62–88). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goukens, C., Dewitte, S., Pandelaere, M., & Warlop, L. (2007). Wanting a bit(e) of everything: Extending the valuation effect to variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorios-Pippas, L. V., Tobler, P., & Schultz, W. (2005). Processing of reward delay and magnitude in the human brain. Annual Meeting of the Society of Neuroscience Program, Washington, D.C. no.74:6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjichristidis, C., Handley, S. J., Sloman, S. A., St, J., Evans, B. T., Over, D. E., et al. (2007). Iffy beliefs: Conditional thinking and belief change. Memory and Cognition, 35, 2052–2059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariri, A. R., Brown, S. M., Williamson, D. E., Flory, J. D., de Wit, H., & Manuck, S. B. (2006a). Preference for immediate over delayed rewards is associated with magnitude of ventral striatal activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 13213–13217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgcock, W., & Rao, A. R. (2009). Trade-off aversion as an explanation for the attraction effect: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P. M., & Page, C. M. (2004). Asymmetric association of liking and disliking judgments: So what's not to like? Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 588–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., Herzog, S. M., Schooler, L. J., & Reimer, T. (2008). Fluency heuristic: A model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1191–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluation of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Gu, Y., & Chen, J. (2009). Specification seeking: How product specifications influence consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 952–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Yu, F., & Xi, Y. (2003). Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, T., Cho, J.-E., Namkoong, J.-E., & Roese, N. J. (2007). Taking risks to have fun: a reversal of loss aversion in leisure-oriented choice, Society for Judgment and Decision Making (SJDM) 28th Annual Conference, November 16–19, 2007, Long Beach, CA, (http://www.sjdm.org/files/programs/2007-posters.pdf)

  • Inaba, M., Nomura, M., & Ohira, H. (2005). Neural evidence of effects of emotional valence on word recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. J., Woloshyn, V., & Kelly, C. (2005). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention. In D. A. Balota & E. Marsh (Eds.), Cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Etienne, A., Ozdoba, C., Perrig, W. J., & Nirkko, A. C. (2007). On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, R. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Brown, J. W. (2008). Neural correlates of behavioral differences between descriptive and experiential choice, Society for Judgment and Decision Making the 2008 29th Annual Conference, November 14–17, Chicago, http://www.sjdm.org/files/programs/2008-program.pdf

  • Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2007). The organization of thinking: What functional brain imaging reveals about the neuroarchitecture of complex cognition. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 153–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental test of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory; an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkenscher, T., Ohmann, T., & Gunturkun, O. (2006). The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley, S. W., Walton, M. E., Behrens, T. E. J., Buckley, M. J., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2006). Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 940–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, But not source, information for positive and negative stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2564–2570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klucharev, V., Smids, A., & Fernandez, G. (2008). Brain mechanisms of persuasion: How “expert power” modulates memory and attitudes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2008). Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation – The example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1987–1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314, 829–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B., Wimmer, G. E., Kuhnen, C. M., & Winkielman, P. (2008a). Nucleus accumbens activation mediates the influence of reward cues on financial risk taking. NeuroReport, 19, 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konig, C., Buhner, M., & Murling, F. (2005). Working memory fluid intelligence, and attention are predictors of multitasking performance, but polychronicity and extraversion are not. Human Performance, 18, 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam3, K., Parrish, T. B., et al. (2006). The prepared mind: Neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychology Science, 17, 882–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., Wagner, M., Yoon, C., & Adaval, R. (2006). Effects of extreme-priced products on consumer reservation prices. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 176–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2008). The MPG illusion. Science, 320, 1593–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear Anger and Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference: An overview. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 1–40). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, A., Eliasmith, C., & Thagard, P. (2008). Neural affective decision theory: Choices, brains and emotions. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 252–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, Ch, & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004b). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44, 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, S. M., York, M. K., & Montague, P. R. (2004c). The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: The modern role of fMRI. The Neuroscientist, 10, 260–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 27, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, H., Shiv, B., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2008). The blissful ignorance effect: Pre-versus post-action effects on outcome expectancies arising from precise and vague information. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobini, S., Body, S., Ho, M.-Y., Bradshaw, C., Szabadi, E., Deakin, J., et al. (2002). Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 160, 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, C., Aaker, J. L., & Pennington, G. L. (2008). The distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 670–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monterosso, J. R., Ainslie, G., Xu, J., Cordova, X., Domier, C. P., & London, E. D. (2007). Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal, A., & Krishnamurthy, P. (2008). Attribute conflict in consumer decision making: The role of task compatibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). The interaction of ego-depletion and choice. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigue, S., Demicheli, F., Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2007). The neural basis of love as a subliminal prime: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1218–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key element of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 983–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa, C., & Assad, J. A. (2006). Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic Value. Nature, 441, 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, A., Koeneke, S., Dieckmann, A., Bosch, V., Wildner, R., & Jäncke, L. (2008). Brand-preference modulated neural activity during expectation and evaluation of an uncertain reward. Conference on NeuroEconomics 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark, May 15–16, 2008, 13 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, G. J., & Robert, G. (2006). Perception of mouthfeel sensations elicited by red wine are associated with sensitivity to 6-N-propylthiouracil. Journal of Sensory Studies, 21, 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., Ambler, T., Braeutigam, S., & Kenning, P. (2007a). What can advertisers learn from neuroscience? International Journal of Advertising, 26, 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 1050–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochon, J. B., Riis, J., Sanfey, A., Nystrom, L., & Cohen, J. (2008). Functional imaging of decision conflict. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3468–3473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, T. A., Simen, P., Lewis, R. L., & Freedman, E. (2002). A computational approach to control in complex cognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribyl, C., Nose, I., Taira, M., Fleming, J. H., Sakamoto, M., Gonzalez, G., Coffman, C., Harter, J. K., & Asplund, J. (2007). The Neural Basis of Brand Addiction: An fMRI, Gallup Management Journal, November 1, http://gmj.gallup.com/content/102520/Neural-Basis-Brand-Addiction-fMRI-Study.aspx.

  • Quartz, S., & Asp, A. (2005). Brain branding. Proceedings of the 58th ESOMAR Congress, September 18–21, Cannes, France, 406–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. (2006). The microeconomics of customer relationships. Sloan Management Review, 47, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisen, N., Hoffrage, U., & Mast, F. W. (2008). Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 641–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2005). Lovemarks, the Future beyond Brands. New York, NY: PowerHouse Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross currents in research on decision making. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, M., & Rotte, M. (2007). Favorite brands as cultural objects modulate reward circuits. Neuroreport, 18, 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., & Mauss, I. B. (2009). To be happy and to know it: The experience and meta-awareness of pleasure. In M. L. Kringelbach & K. C. Berridge (Eds.), Pleasures of the brain (pp. 244–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweighofer, N., Tanaka, S. C., & Doya, K. (2007). Serotonin and the evaluation of future rewards: Theory, experiments, and possible neural mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, B., & McClure, S. M. (2008). Anchors, scales and the relative coding of value in the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E., Diamond, P., & Tversky, A. (1997). Money illusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 341–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, Y., Tykocinski, O. E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). When ignorance is not bliss: How feelings of discomfort promote the search for negative information. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 643–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, T., De Martino, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). How choice reveals and shapes expected hedonic outcome. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3760–3765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., Loewenstein, G., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychological Science, 16, 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2008). Integrating memories in the human brain: Hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events. Neuron, 60, 378–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., Geva, A., Jonides, J., Miller, A., Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Koeppe, R. A. (2005). The neural basis of task-switching on working memory: Effects of performance and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 2095–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments. Learning, and Memory, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1824–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. A., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Chen, R., & Zhao, P. (2009). Do the size of consideration set and the source of the better competing option influence post-choice regret? Motivation and Emotion, 33, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhof1, T. C., & Malenka, R. C. (2008). Understanding synapses: Past, present, and future. Neuron, 60, 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, T., Ikeda, K., Fukushima, H., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). Salivary alpha-amylase levels and hyperbolic discounting in male humans. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 28, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. C., Balleine, B. W., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2008). Calculating consequences: Brain systems that encode the causal effects of actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6750–6755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, P. N., Christopoulos, G. I., O’Doherty, J., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2008). Neuronal distortions of reward probability without choice. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11703–11711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, S., Fox, C., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315, 515–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trémeau, F., Brady, M., Saccente, E., Moreno, A., Epstein, H., Citrome, L., et al. (2008). Loss aversion in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 103, 121–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueichi, H., & Kusumi, T. (2004). Change in feelings of regret over time: Relation to decision-making style, behavior, and coping methods. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 74, 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, K. G., Schubotz, R. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006b). Decision-making and the frontal lobes. Current Opinion in Neurology, 19, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. C., & Ostrom, A. L. (2003). The internet as information minefield: An analysis of the source and content of brand information yielded by net searches. Journal of Business Research, 56, 907–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. K., Matthews, B. J., & Allman, J. M. (2007). Brain activation during sight gags and language-dependent humor. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 314–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, B., Rangel, A., Wibral, M., & Falk, A. (2009). The medial prefrontal cortex exhibits money illusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 5025–5028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. (2007). Neural correlates of adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses. Psychological Science, 18, 958–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R., McNerney, M. W., & Travers, S. (2007). Gone but not forgotten: The effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., Knutson, B., Paulus, M., & Trujillo, J. L. (2007). Affective influence on decisions: Moving towards core mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 11, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, M., Leland, D., & Paulus, M. (2007). Time and decision making: Differential contribution of the posterior insular cortex and the striatum during a delay discounting task. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 643–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. R., Arkes, H. R., & Muhanna, W. A. (2008). The power of touch: An examination of the effect of duration of physical contact on the valuation of objects. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 476–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature, 447, 1075–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Gutchess, A. H., Feinberg, F., & Polk, T. A. (2006). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money. Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysset, S., Wendt, C. S., Volz, K. G., Neumann, J., Huber, O., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). The neural implementation of multi-attribute decision making: A parametric fmri study with human subjects. Neuroimage, 31, 1380–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47, 763–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burson, K., Faro, D., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2008). Providing multiple units of a good attenuates the endowment effect, Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Nove. 14–17, 2008, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (2006). Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference, (pp. 192–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Sattah, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference, (pp. 95–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89, 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S., Burt, C. D. B., & Furneaux, L. (2008). A test of the peak-end rule with extended autobiographical events. Memory & Cognition, 36, 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21, 1155–1166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leon Zurawicki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zurawicki, L. (2010). Neural Underpinnings of Risk Handling, Developing Preference and Choosing. In: Neuromarketing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77829-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics