Skip to main content

Accuracy Assessment of DEM Slope Algorithms Related to Spatial Autocorrelation of DEM Errors

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Digital elevation models (DEM) are representations of topography but with unavoidable inherent errors, which result in DEM uncertainty. Entities are spatially dependent and with autocorrelation related to distance. The spatial autocorrelation of the DEM error will systematically affect the result of terrain analysis. It should be taken into account when calculating slope from a grid-based DEM. The effect of the accuracy of slope calculation models on terrain analysis based on quantitative models could be very significant. DEM uncertainty and error propagation is hard to describe with a single, fixed and analytical error based on spatial databases. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is an effective method to simulate error fields and can be used to research the DEM error’s spatial autocorrelation and DEM uncertainty. The accuracy of slopes is studied and four commonly used slope algorithms, namely, the 2nd Finite Difference, 3rd order Finite Difference, 3rd order Finite Difference Weighted by Reciprocal of Squared Distance, and 3rd order Finite Difference Weighted by Reciprocal of Distance, are compared theoretically in this paper based on the error being spatially dependent and autocorrelated. The theoretical results are confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation experiments using three digital elevation model data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abstract

  • Burrough P.A. and McDonnell, R.A., (1998), Principles of Geographical Information System, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlschlaeger C.R. and Shortridge, A., (1996), Modeling Elevation Uncertainty in Geographical Analyses, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, Netherland, 9B: 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlschlaeger C.R., (1998), The Stochastic Simulation Approach: Tools for Representing Spatial Application Uncertainty, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P.F., (1991), First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: The accuracy of the viewshed area, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (57)10: 1321–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P. F., (1994), Probable and fuzzy models of the viewshed operation. In Worboys, W. F. (ed.): Innovations in GIS 1: 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming M.D. and Hoffer, R.M., (1979), Machine processing of Landsat MSS data and DMA topographic data for forest cover type mapping: LARS Technical Report 062879, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue, University, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky I.V., (1998a), Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models, INT. J. Geographical Information Science, (12)1: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky I.V., (1998b) Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations, Progress in Physical Geography, (22)1: 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink B.M., (1998), Error Propagation in Environmental Modeling with GIS, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn B.K.P. (1981), Hill shading and the reflectance map, Proceedings of IEEE, (69)1: 14–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G. J. and Goodchild, M.F., (1997) Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases, Geographical Analysis, (29)1: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J., Snyder, P.K. and Fisher, P.F., (1992) Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (58)10: 1461–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J., (1996) Digital Elevation Models: Issues of Data Accuracy and Applications, ESRI User Conference, www.esri.com/resources/userconf/proc96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu R., (1994), The Effects of Spatial Data Errors on the Grid-Based Forest management Decisions, Ph.D. Dissertation, State University Of New York College Of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Xuejun, (2002), On the Accuracy of the Algorithms for Interpreting Grid-based Digital Terrain Model, PhD Thesis, Wuhan Univeisity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I.D., Grayson, R.B. and Ladson, A.R., (1991), Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications, Hydrological Processes, 5, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore I.D., (1996), Hydrologic Modeling and GIS, In Gooldchild, M.F., Steyaert, L.T., Parks, B.O., Crane, M.P., Maidment, D.R. and Glendinning, S. (eds.): GIS and Environmental modeling: Progress and Research Issuse, Fort Collins, CO: GIS World Books: 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J. and Sarjakoshi, T., (2005) Error propagation analysis of DEM-based surface derivatives, Computers & Geosciences, 31: 1015–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S., Charlton, M. and Carver, S., (1991) Error Propagation: a Monte Carlo simulation, In Masser, I. and Blakemore, M., (eds.): Handling Geographic Information, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter D., (1987), A vector-based slope and aspect generation algorithm, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (53)8: 1109–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpnack D.A. and Akin, G., (1969), An Algorithm for computing slope and aspect from elevations, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 5: 247–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore A.K., (1989), A comparison of techniques for the calculation of gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 3: 323-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin D., (1981), Introductory Spatial Analysis, London and New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler S.W., (1999), A methodology for digital elevation model (DEM) uncertainty evaluation: the effect DEM uncertainty on topographic parameters, URISA 99 Annual Conference Proceeding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J.D., (1996), The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation model, PhD Thesis, University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen L.W. and Thorne, C.R., (1987), Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q. and Liu, X., (2002), Error assessment of grid-based flow routing algorithms used in hydrological models, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (16)8: 819–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xuejun, L., Lu, B. (2008). Accuracy Assessment of DEM Slope Algorithms Related to Spatial Autocorrelation of DEM Errors. In: Zhou, Q., Lees, B., Tang, Ga. (eds) Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics