Abstract
Since the introduction of cross-sectional imaging for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal pathologies, an increased number of small renal masses are being incidentally discovered. These lesions are often peripherally located, with a benign histology in less than half of the cases. Following removal, no significant differences in survival rates exist between patients who have undergone partial or radical nephrectomy. In addition, the local recurrence rate after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is less than 3%. For all of these reasons, and motivated by the benefits of decreased patient morbidity and fast recovery, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is successfully becoming the standard of care for the surgical management of exophytic renal tumors 4 cm in diameter or smaller. However, despite the potential advantages of nephron-sparing surgery and the laparoscopic approach over open surgery, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is still not widely performed because of technical difficulties inherent to the procedure. There is ongoing debate regarding the need for complete hilar clamping, warm ischemia time, and the use of haemostatic techniques after tumor removal. Even in skilled hands, this complex procedure is still evolving. The technique described uses a transperitoneal route and an extracorporeal clamp approach of delayed occlusion and early release of the renal pedicle to minimize warm ischemia time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggested Readings
Orvieto MA, Zorn KC: Recovery of renal function after complete renal hilar versus artery alone clamping during open and laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 2007 Jun; 177(6):2371–2374.
Verhoest G, Manunta A: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with clamping of the renal parenchyma: initial experience. Eur Urol 2007 Nov; 52(5):1340–6.
Bollens R, Rosenblatt A: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with “on-demand” clamping reduces warm ischemia time. Eur Urol 2007 Apr; 52(3): 804–810.
Van Dijk JH, Pes PL: Haemostasis in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current status. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16(1):31–44.
Häcker A, Albadour A: Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumours: acceleration and facilitation of the laparoscopic technique. Eur Urol 2007 Feb; 51(2):358–365.
Breda A, Stepanian SV: Use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases. Eur Urol 2007 Feb; 52(3):798–803.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. In: Manual of Laparoscopic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74727-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74727-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74726-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74727-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)