Skip to main content

The Influence of Task Contexts on the Decision-Making of Humans and Computers

  • Conference paper
Book cover Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4635))

Abstract

Many environments in which people and computer agents interact involve deploying resources to accomplish tasks and satisfy goals. This paper investigates the way that the context in which decisions are made affects the behavior of people and the performance of computer agents that interact with people in such environments. It presents experiments that measured negotiation behavior in two different types of settings. One setting was a task context that made explicit the relationships among goals, (sub)tasks and resources. The other setting was a completely abstract context in which only the payoffs for the decision choices were listed. Results show that people are more helpful, less selfish, and less competitive when making decisions in task contexts than when making them in completely abstract contexts. Further, their overall performance was better in task contexts. A predictive computational model that was trained on data obtained in the task context outperformed a model that was trained under the abstract context. These results indicate that taking context into account is essential for the design of computer agents that will interact well with people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Das, R., Hanson, J.E., Kephart, J.O., Tesauro, G.: Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) Proc. 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A.: Predicting people’s bidding behavior in negotiation. In: Stone, P., Weiss, G. (eds.) Proc. 5th International Joint Conference on Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A., Marzo, F., Grosz, B.: Learning social preferences in games. In: Proc. 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grosz, B., Kraus, S., Talman, S., Stossel, B.: The influence of social dependencies on decision-making. Initial investigations with a new game. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds.) Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3394, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jarvenpaa, S.L.: The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science 35(3), 285–303 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 193–206 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (eds.): Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liberman, V., Samuels, S., Ross, L.: The name of the game: Predictive power of reputation vs. situational labels in dertermining prisoners’ dilemma game moves

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marzo, F., Gal, Y., Grosz, B., Pfeffer, A.: Social preferences in relational contexts. In: Fourth Conference in Collective Intentionality (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pollack, M.E.: Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Magazine 26(9) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 452–458 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tversky, A., Simonson, I.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences 22(2), 219–240 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Boicho Kokinov Daniel C. Richardson Thomas R. Roth-Berghofer Laure Vieu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gal, Y., Grosz, B., Pfeffer, A., Shieber, S., Allain, A. (2007). The Influence of Task Contexts on the Decision-Making of Humans and Computers. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4635. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74254-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74255-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics