Skip to main content

Advanced 3D Imaging Technology for Autonomous Manufacturing Systems

  • Conference paper
Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice
  • 1593 Accesses

Abstract

Today’s markets and economies are becoming increasingly volatile, unpredictable, they are changing radically and even the innovation speed is accelerating. Manufacturing and production technology and systems must keep pace with this trend. The impact of novel innovative 3D imaging technology to counter these radical changes is exemplarily shown on the robot paint process. One has to keep in mind that investments in automatic painting lines are considerably high and as the painting line often is the bottleneck in production, it is imperative to prevent nonproductive times and maximize the use of the expensive equipment. Highly flexible, scalable and user-friendly production equipment is needed, including robotic systems for painting – a common process in production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “Flexpaint.” [Online]. Available: www.flexpaint.org.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Autere, “Resource allocation between path planning algorithms using meta a*,” in ISRA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N.W.C. Robertson, R.B. Fisher and A. Ashbrook, “Finding machined artifacts in complex range data surfaces,” in Proc. ACDM2000, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.J. Campbell and P.J. Flynn, “Eigenshapes for 3D object recognition in range data,” pp. 505–510. [Online]. Available: citeseer.ist.psu.edu/137290.html.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Camps, C. Huang, and T. Kanungo, “Hierarchical organization of appearance-based parts and relations for object recognition,” 1998. [Online]. Available: citeseer.ist.psu.edu/camps98hierarchical.html

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Freund, D. Rokossa, and J. Rossmann, “Process-oriented approach to an efficient off-line programming of industrial robots,” in IECON 98: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hertling, L. Hog, L. Larsen, J. Perram, and H. Petersen, “Task curve planning for painting robots – part i: Process modeling and calibration,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 324–330, April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hoffman and A.K. Jain, “Segmentation and classification of range images,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 608–620, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Hoover, G. Jean-Baptiste, X. Jiang, P.J. Flynn, H. Bunke, D.B. Goldgof, K.K. Bowyer, D.W. Eggert, A.W. Fitzgibbon, and R.B. Fisher, “An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 673–689, 1996. [Online]. Available: citeseer.csail.mit.edu/hoover96experimental.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Jacobsen, K. Ahrentsen, R. Larsen, and L. Overgaard, “Automatic robot welding in complex ship structures,” in 9th Int. Conf. on ComputerApplication in Shipbuilding, 1997, pp. 410–430.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.J.Campbell and P.J. Flynn, “A survey of free-form object representation and recognition techniques,” Comput. Vis. Image Underst., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 166–210, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Johnson and M. Hebert, “Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 433–449, May 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Kadir and M. Brady, “Scale, saliency and image description,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 83–105, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. K.K. Gupta and A.D. Pobil, “Apartical motion planning in robotics: Current approaches and future directions,” 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Kwok, C. Louks, and B. Driessen, “Rapid 3-d digitizing and tool path generation for complex shapes,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998, pp. 2789–2794.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Marshall, G. Lukacs, and R. Martin, “Robust segmentation of primitives from range data in the presence of geometric degeneracy,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 304–314, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Murase and S.K. Nayar, “Visual learning and recognition of 3-d objects from appearance,” Int. J. Comput. Vision, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Olsen and H. Petersen, “A new method for estimating parameters of a dynamic robot model,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 95–100, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Pichler, M. Vincze, O. M. H. Anderson, and K. Haeusler, “A method for automatic spray painting of unknown parts,” in In IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.R.B., F. A.W., M. Waite, O.M., and E. Trucco, “Recognition of complex 3-d objects from range data,” in CIAP93, 1993, pp. 509–606.

    Google Scholar 

  21. X. Sheng and M. Krmker, “Surface reconstruction and extrapolation from multiple range images for automatic turbine blades repair,” in IEEE IECON Conference, 1998, pp. 1315–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Tse and Y. Chen, “A robotic system for rapid prototyping,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1997, pp. 1815–1820.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Eberst, H. Bauer, H. Nöhmeyer, J. Minichberger, A. Pichler, G. Umgeher, “Self-programming Robotized Cells for Flexible Paint-Jobs”, International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics 2004, Aachen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Hilton, A.J. Stoddart, J. Illingworth and T. Windeatt, Marching Triangles: Range Image Fusion for Complex Object Modelling’, IEEE 1996 International Conference on Image Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Devore, Probability and Statistics for Engineering and Sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pichler, A., Bauer, H., Eberst, C., Heindl, C., Minichberger, J. (2008). Advanced 3D Imaging Technology for Autonomous Manufacturing Systems. In: Billingsley, J., Bradbeer, R. (eds) Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74027-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74027-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74026-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74027-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics