Skip to main content

Virginia Tech’s Twin Contenders: A Comparative Study of Reactive and Deliberative Navigation

  • Chapter
The 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge

Abstract

There are two commonly accepted paradigms for organizing intelligence in robotic vehicles, namely, reactive and deliberative. Although these paradigms are well known to researchers, there are few published examples directly comparing their development and application on similar vehicles operating in similar environments. Virginia Tech’s participation, with two nearly identical vehicles in the DARPA Grand Challenge, afforded a practical opportunity for such a case study. The two Virginia Tech vehicles, Cliff and Rocky, proved capable of off-road navigation, including road following and obstacle avoidance in complex desert terrain. Under the conditions of our testing, the reactive paradigm developed for Cliff produced smoother paths and proved to be more reliable than the deliberative paradigm developed for Rocky. The deliberative method shows great promise for planning feasible paths through complex environments, but it proved unnecessarily complex for the desert road navigation problem posed by the Grand Challenge. This case study, while limited to two specific software implementations, may help to shed additional light on the tradeoffs and performance of competing approaches to machine intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Coulter, R.C. (1992). Implementation of the pure pursuit path tracking algorithm (Tech. Rep. CMU-RI-TR-92-01). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Robotics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T.D. (1992). Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Yao, F., & Zhang, T. (1998). A linear algorithm for optimal context clustering with application to bilevel image coding. Paper presented the International Conference on Image Processing. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E., Nilsson, N.J., & Raphael, B. (1968). A formal basis for heuristic determination of minimum path cost. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Science, and Cybernetics 4, 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.S. (1984). Edge detection by partitioning. In E.G. Wegman (Ed.), Statistical image processing (pp. 59–69). New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, B.M. (2006). Two minds for one vehicle: A case study in deliberative and reactive navigation. Unpublished Masters thesis, Virginia Tech, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (2000). Introduction to AI robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putney, J. (2006). Reactive navigation of an autonomous ground vehicle using dynamic expanding zones. Unpublished Masters thesis, Virginia Tech, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. (2004). Grouping dominant orientations for Ill-structured road following. Paper presented at the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’04), San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C.W. (1999). Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. Foster City, CA: Sony Computer Entertainment America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D.H., & Singh, S. (1990). Path generation for robot vehicle using composite clothoid segments (Tech Rep. CMU-RI-TR-90-31). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, The Robotics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leedy, B.M., Putney, J.S., Bauman, C., Cacciola, S., Michael Webster, J., Reinholtz, C.F. (2007). Virginia Tech’s Twin Contenders: A Comparative Study of Reactive and Deliberative Navigation. In: Buehler, M., Iagnemma, K., Singh, S. (eds) The 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 36. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73429-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73429-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73428-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73429-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics