Skip to main content

Experiments in Computational Aesthetics

An Iterative Approach to Stylistic Change in Evolutionary Art

  • Chapter
Book cover The Art of Artificial Evolution

Part of the book series: Natural Computing Series ((NCS))

Summary

A novel approach to the production of evolutionary art is presented. This approach is based on the promotion of an arms race between an adaptive classifier and an evolutionary computation system. An artificial neural network is trained to discriminate among images previously created by the evolutionary engine and famous paintings. Once training is over, evolutionary computation is used to generate images that the neural network classifies as paintings. The images created throughout the evolutionary run are added to the training set and the process is repeated. This iterative process leads to the refinement of the classifier and forces the evolutionary algorithm to explore new paths. The experimental results attained across iterations are presented and analyzed. Validation tests were conducted in order to assess the changes induced by the refinement of the classifier and to identify the types of images that are difficult to classify. Taken as a whole, the experimental results show the soundness and potential of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Machado, P., Cardoso, A. (1997). Model proposal for a constructed artist. In Callaos, N., Khoong, C., Cohen, E., eds.: First World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, SCI97/ISAS97. Caracas, Venezuela, 521–528

    Google Scholar 

  2. Romero, J. (2002). Metodología Evolutiva para la Construcción de Modelos Cognitivos Complejos. Exploración de la Creatividad Artificial en Composición Musical. PhD thesis. University of Corunha. Corunha, Spain (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Romero, J., Machado, P., Santos, A., Cardoso, A. (2003). On the development of critics in evolutionary computation artists. In Günther, R., et al., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2003: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC. Vol. 2611 of LNCS. Essex, UK. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manaris, B., Purewal, T., McCormick, C. (2002). Progress towards recognizing and classifying beautiful music with computers — MIDI-encoded music and the Zipf–Mandelbrot law. In: Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon. Columbia, SC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manaris, B., Romero, J., Machado, P., Krehbiel, D., Hirzel, T., Pharr, W., Davis, R. (2005). Zipf’s law, music classification and aesthetics. Computer Music Journal, 29(1): 55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manaris, B., Roos, P., Machado, P., Krehbiel, D., Pellicoro, L., Romero, J. (2007). A corpus-based hybrid approach to music analysis and composition. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 07). Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Machado, P., Romero, J., Santos, A., Cardoso, A., Manaris, B. (2004). Adaptive critics for evolutionary artists. In Günther, R., et al., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2004: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC. Vol. 3005 of LNCS. Coimbra, Portugal. Springer, 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  8. Machado, P., Romero, J., Cardoso, A., Santos, A. (2005). Partially interactive evolutionary artists. New Generation Computing – Special Issue on Interactive Evolutionary Computation, 23(42): 143–155

    Google Scholar 

  9. Machado, P. (2007). Inteligência Artificial e Arte. PhD thesis. University of Coimbra. Coimbra, Portugal (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Machado, P., Cardoso, A. (1998). Computing aesthetics. In Oliveira, F., ed.: Proceedings of the XIVth Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1515 of LNCS. Porto Alegre, Brazil. Springer, 219–229

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, R.P., Micolich, A.P., Jonas, D. (1999). Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings. Nature, 399: 422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saunders, R. (2001). Curious Design Agents and Artificial Creativity — A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Creative Behaviour. PhD thesis. University of Sydney, Department of Architectural and Design Science Faculty of Architecture. Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manaris, B.Z., Vaughan, D., Wagner, C., Romero, J., Davis, R.B. (2003). Evolutionary music and the Zipf–Mandelbrot law: Developing fitness functions for pleasant music. In Günther, R., et al., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshop 2003: EvoBIO, EvoCOP, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoROB, and EvoSTIM. Vol. 2611 of LNCS. Springer, 522–534

    Google Scholar 

  14. Machado, P., Romero, J., Manaris, B., Santos, A., Cardoso, A. (2003). Power to the critics — A framework for the development of artificial art critics. In: IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Creative Systems. Acapulco, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manaris, B., Machado, P., McCauley, C., Romero, J., Krehbiel, D. (2005). Developing fitness functions for pleasant music: Zipf’s law and interactive evolution systems. In Rothlauf, F., et al., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2005: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC. Vol. 3449 of LNCS. Lausanne, Switzerland. Springer, 498–507

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sims, K. (1991). Artificial evolution for computer graphics. ACM Computer Graphics, 25: 319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Machado, P., Cardoso, A. (2002). All the truth about NEvAr. Applied Intelligence, Special Issue on Creative Systems, 16(2): 101–119

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenfield, G. (2002). Color dependent computational aesthetics for evolving expressions. In Sarhangi, R., ed.: Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science; Conference Proceedings 2002. Winfield, Kansas. Central Plains Book Manufacturing, 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greenfield, G. (2003). Evolving aesthetic images using multiobjective optimization. In McKay, B., et al., eds.: Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2003. Vol. 3. Canberra, Australia. IEEE Press, 1903–1909

    Google Scholar 

  20. Svangård, N., Nordin, P. (2004). Automated aesthetic selection of evolutionary art by distance based classification of genomes and phenomes using the universal similarity metric. In Günther, R., et al., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2004: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC. Vol. 3005 of LNCS. Coimbra, Portugal. Springer, 445–454

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baluja, S., Pomerlau, D., Todd, J. (1994). Towards automated artificial evolution for computer-generated images. Connection Science, 6(2): 325–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenfield, G.R. (2002). On the co-evolution of evolving expressions. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2(1): 17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Todd, P.M., Werner, G.M. (1999). Frankensteinian approaches to evolutionary music composition. In Griffith, N., Todd, P.M., eds.: Musical Networks: Parallel Distributed Perception and Performance. MIT Press, 313–340

    Google Scholar 

  24. Birkhoff, G. (1933). Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moles, A. (1958). Théorie de L’Information et Perception Esthétique. Denoel

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arnheim, R. (1956). Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye. Faber and Faber. London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arnheim, R. (1966). Towards a Psychology of Art/Entropy and Art — An Essay on Disorder and Order. The Regents of the University of California

    Google Scholar 

  28. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bense, M. (1965). Aesthetica. Einführung in die neue Aesthetik. Agis (reprinted by Baden-Baden, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shannon, C.E. (1951). Prediction and entropy of printed english. Bell System Technical Journal, (30): 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  31. Staudek, T. (2002). Exact Aesthetics. Object and Scene to Message. PhD thesis. Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University of Brno

    Google Scholar 

  32. Staudek, T., Linkov, V. (2004). Personality characteristics and aesthetic preference for chaotic curves. Journal of Mathematics and Design, 4(1): 297–304

    Google Scholar 

  33. Graves, M. (1948). Design Judgement Test. The Psychological Corporation. New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., Wang, J.Z. (2006). Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2006, 9th European Conference on Computer Vision, Part III. LNCS. Graz, Austria. Springer, 288–301

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aks, D., Sprott, J.C. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spehar, B., Clifford, C.W.G., Newell, N., Taylor, R.P. (2003). Universal aesthetic of fractals. Computers and Graphics, 27(5): 813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wannarumon, S., Bohez, E.L.J. (2006). A new aesthetic evolutionary approach for jewelry design. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 3(1-4): 385–394

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wertheimer, M. (1939). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In Ellis, W.D., ed.: A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt Brace. New York, 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tyler, C.W., ed. (2002). Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  40. Field, D.J., Hayes, A., Hess, R.F. (2000). The roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments. Spatial Vision, 13(1): 51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cope, D. (1992). On the algorithmic representation of musical style. In Laske, O., ed.: Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition. MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 354–363

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kittler, J. (1983). On the accuracy of the Sobel edge detector. Image Vision Computing, 1(1): 37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zell, A., Mamier, G., Vogt, M., Mache, N., Hübner, R., Döring, S., Herrmann, K.U., Soyez, T., Schmalzl, M., Sommer, T., et al. (2003). SNNS: Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator User Manual, Version 4.2. Technical Report 3/92. University of Stuttgart. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  45. Directmedia (2002). 10000 Meisterwerke der Malerei — von der Antike bis zum Beginn der Moderne. DVD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Machado, P., Romero, J., Manaris, B. (2008). Experiments in Computational Aesthetics. In: Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds) The Art of Artificial Evolution. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72877-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72877-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72876-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72877-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics