Skip to main content

Abstract

The field of surgical education is young, and opportunities are not on the same scale as they are in fields of fundamental biology, clinical epidemiology, or health care outcomes research; however, the trajectory is steep, and educational work is improving in its sophistication and adherence to methodological principles. There is also an excitement and desire among young academic surgeons to work in an area that has obvious and direct relevance to their “mainstream job” as surgeons. This chapter explores approaches that can bring such evidence to bear upon educational questions, since education, like any other discipline, cannot be subject to practice by anecdote. Changes must be made on the basis of methodologically rigorous and scientifi-cally sound research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reznick RK, Blackmore DE, Dauphinee WD et al (1997) An OSCE for licensure: the Canadian experience. In: Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM, Rethans JJ, van der Steeg AFW (eds) Advances in medical education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 458–461

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM (1977) The portable patient problem pack: a problem-based learning unit. J Med Educ 52:1002–1004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman CP, France CL, Drossman DD (1991) A randomized comparison of alternative formats for clinical simulations. Med Decis Making 11:265–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stern Z (2003) Opening Pandora's box: residents' work hours. Int J Qual Health Care 15:103–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlin AM, Gasevic E, Shepard AD (2007) Effect of the 80-hour work week on resident operative experience in general surgery. Am J Surg 193:326–329; discussion 329–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leach DC (2004) A model for GME: shifting from process to outcomes. A progress report from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Med Educ 38:12–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pickersgill T (2001) The European working time directive for doctors in training. BMJ 323:1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ (2000) Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 284:357–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ (2000) Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 284:478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorne S (1997) The art (and science) of critiquing qualitative research. In: Morse JM (ed) Completing a qualitative project: details and dialogue. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 117–132

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mays N, Pope C (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 311:109–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lingard L (2007) The rhetorical ‘turn’ in medical education: what have we learned and where are we going? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12:121–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mays N, Pope C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320:50–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubrowski A (2005) Performance vs. learning curves: what is motor learning and how is it measured? Surg Endosc 19:1290

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brydges R, Kurahashi A, Brummer V et al (2008) Developing criteria for proficiency-based training of surgical technical skills using simulation: changes in performances as a function of training year. J Am Coll Surg 206:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyde WD (1986) How small groups solve problems. Ind Eng 18:42–49

    Google Scholar 

  20. Judd CM, Kenny DA (1981) Estimating the effects of social intervention. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madu CN, Kuei C-H, Madu AN (1991) Setting priorities for the IT industry in Taiwan — a Delphi study. Long Range Plann 24:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S et al (2002) The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg 184:70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyle Leming J, Dorman K, Brydges R et al (2007) Tensiometry as a measure of improvement in knot quality in undergraduate medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12:331–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubrowski, A., Carnahan, H., Reznick, R. (2010). Research in Surgical Education: A Primer. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics