In the last decade, several lines of evidence have demonstrated that most sensory systems and particularly the visual system are intensely subject to dynami¬cal top-down influences that depend on the current behavior of the organism. During natural vision, eye movements and neuronal activity in many visual areas are dependent on attention and goal-directed actions of the organism. Yet, current models of visual perception are mainly based on studies that have examined neuro-nal activity using very simple stimuli, or restrictive behavioral conditions. Moreover, current receptive field models based on these studies appear to fail when they are tested during experiments that used natural stimuli or complex visual behavior. In this chapter, we discuss new evidence showing that the classical receptive field is an incomplete description of the response of neurons in the visual system, largely because we have overlooked top-down influences in neuronal activity and behavior. We argue that the use of natural stimuli and natural behaviors such as free viewing, by including attention and other top-down mechanisms, can provide new insights into the neurodynamical correlates of visual perception.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aminoff, E., Gronau, N., & Bar, M. (2007b). The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations.CerebralCortex, 17, 1493–1503
Awh, E., Armstrong, K. M., & Moore, T. (2006). Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention.Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 124–130
Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context.Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5617–629
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M. et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 449–454
Barlow, H. B. (1961). Possible principles underlying the transformations of sensory images. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.)Sensory communication(pp. 217–234). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness.Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645–650
Bringuier, V., Chavane, F., Glaeser, L., & Fregnac, Y. (1999). Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons.Science, 283, 695–699
Carello, C. D. & Krauzlis, R. J. (2004). Manipulating intent: Evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection.Neuron, 43, 575–583
Chen, C. M., Lakatos, P., Shah, A. S., Mehta, A. D., Givre, S. J., Javitt, D. C. et al. (2007). Functional anatomy and interaction of fast and slow visual pathways in macaque monkeys.Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1561–1569
Cohen, J. (2002). The grand grand illusion illusion.Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, 141–157
Corbetta, M. (1998). Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 831–838
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.Nature Review Neuroscience, 3, 201–215
Dan, Y., Atick, J. J., & Reid, R. C. (1996). Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral genicu-late nucleus: Experimental test of a computational theory.Journal of Neuroscience 16, 3351–3362
David, S. V., Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2004). Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6991–7006
Epstein, R., Graham, K. S., & Downing, P. E. (2003). Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex.Neuron, 37, 865–876
Epstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D., & Kanwisher, N. (1999). The parahippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding?Neuron, 23, 115–125
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment.Nature, 392, 598–601
Felsen, G. & Dan, Y. (2005). A natural approach to studying vision.Nature Neuroscience 8, 1643–1646
Felsen, G., Touryan, J., & Dan, Y. (2005). Contextual modulation of orientation tuning contributes to efficient processing of natural stimuli.Network, 16, 139–149
Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2379–2394
Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., & Desimone, R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.Science, 291, 1560–1563
Gilbert, C., Ito, M., Kapadia, M., & Westheimer, G. (2000). Interactions between attention, context and learning in primary visual cortex.Vision Research 40, 1217–1226
Hayhoe, M. & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior.Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 188–194
Hayhoe, M. M., Shrivastava, A., Mruczek, R., & Pelz, J. B. (2003). Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task.Journal of Vision, 3, 49–63
Hendry, S. H. & Reid, R. C. (2000). The koniocellular pathway in primate vision.Annual Review in Neuroscience, 23, 127–153
Huettel, S. A., Guzeldere, G., & McCarthy, G. (2001). Dissociating the neural mechanisms of visual attention in change detection using functional MRI.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13, 1006–1018
Jones, H. E., Grieve, K. L., Wang, W., & Sillito, A. M. (2001). Surround suppression in primate V1.Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2011–2028
Kastner, S. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.Annual Review in Neuroscience, 23, 315–341
Kersten, D. (1987). Predictability and redundancy of natural images.Journal of Optical Society of America A, 4, 2395–2400
Land, M. F. & Hayhoe, M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?Vision Research, 41, 3559–3565
Land, M. F. & McLeod, P. (2000). From eye movements to actions: How batsmen hit the ball.Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1340–1345
Levin, D. T. & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501–506
Luck, S. J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S. A., & Desimone, R. (1997). Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology 77, 24–42
Marcelja, S. (1980). Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells.Journal of Optical Society of America 70, 1297–1300
Moore, T. & Armstrong, K. M. (2003). Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex.Nature, 421, 370–373
Moore, T. & Fallah, M. (2001). Control of eye movements and spatial attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,98, 1273–1276
Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiol, 70, 909–919
Motter, B. C. (1994). Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4. Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2178–2189
Motter, B. C. (1998). Inside and outside the focus of attention. Neuron,21, 951–953
Motter, B. C. & Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research,38, 1805–1815
Noe, A. (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion? Journal of Consciousness Studies,9, 1–12
O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition,7, 191–211
Oliva, A. & Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnos-ticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology,34, 72–107
Oliva, A. & Schyns, P. G. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology,41, 176–210
Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381, 607–609
Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (1997). Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? Vision Research,37, 3311–3325
Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (2004). Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Current Opinion in Neurobiology,14, 481–487
Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (2005). How close are we to understanding v1? Neural Computation,17, 1665–1699
Parraga, C. A., Troscianko, T., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2000). The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images. Current Biology,10, 35–38
Pelz, J. B. & Canosa, R. (2001). Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks. Vision Research, 41, 3587–3596
Pessoa, L. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness in a working memory task. Cerebral Cortex,14, 511–520
Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Milea, D., & Muri, R. M. (2004). Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Current Opinion in Neurology, 17, 17–25
Rousselet, G. A., Joubert, O. R., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2005). How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? Visual Cognition,12, 852–877
Rust, N. C. & Movshon, J. A. (2005). In praise of artifice. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1647–1650
Shulman, G. L., McAvoy, M. P., Cowan, M. C., Astafiev, S. V., Tansy, A. P., d'Avossa, G. et al. (2003). Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology,90, 3384–3397
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074
Simons, D. J. & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,5, 644–649
Simons, D. J. & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 16–20
Smyth, D., Willmore, B., Baker, G. E., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2003). The receptive-field organization of simple cells in primary visual cortex of ferrets under natural scene stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4746–4759
Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., & Dubs, A. (1982). Predictive coding: A fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proceedings of Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Science, 216, 427–459
Tehovnik, E. J., Sommer, M. A., Chou, I. H., Slocum, W. M., & Schiller, P. H. (2000). Eye fields in the frontal lobes of primates. Brain Research Brain Research Review,32, 413–448
Theunissen, F. E., David, S. V., Singh, N. C., Hsu, A., Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2001). Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network,12, 289–316
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature,381, 520–522
Tolhurst, D. J., Tadmor, Y., & Chao, T. (1992). Amplitude Spectra of Natural Images. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,12, 229–232
Triesch, J., Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Sullivan, B. T. (2003). What you see is what you need. Journal of Vision,3, 86–94
Trotter, Y. & Celebrini, S. (1999). Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons. Nature,398, 239–242
Turano, K. A., Geruschat, D. R., & Baker, F. H. (2003). Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vision Research, 43, 333–346
Ungerleider, L. G. & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ‘What’ and ‘Where’ in the human brain. Current Opinion in. Neurobiology,4, 157–165
Vinje, W. E. & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science,287, 1273–1276
Weliky, M., Fiser, J., Hunt, R. H., & Wagner, D. N. (2003). Coding of natural scenes in primary visual cortex. Neuron, 37, 703–718
Womelsdorf, T., Fries, P., Mitra, P. P., & Desimone, R. (2006). Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature,439, 733–736
Worgotter, F., Suder, K., Zhao, Y., Kerscher, N., Eysel, U. T., & Funke, K. (1998). State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex. Nature,396, 165–168
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum
Yen, S. C., Baker, J., & Gray, C. M. (2007). Heterogeneity in the responses of adjacent neurons to natural stimuli in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology,97, 1326–1341
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maldonado, P.E., Ossandón, J.P., Flores, F.J. (2009). Attention and Neurodynamical Correlates of Natural Vision. In: Aboitiz, F., Cosmelli, D. (eds) From Attention to Goal-Directed Behavior. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70573-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70573-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70572-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70573-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)