Skip to main content
  • 620 Accesses

The Inter-American human rights system appears to be inconsistent in its recognition of the right to conscientious objection. The first conscientious objector case decided under the Inter-American system occurred in March 2005. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights stated that international human rights jurisprudence recognises the status of conscientious objectors only in countries recognising such status in their national laws. This statement exactly contradicts the statement of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of 1997 which invited the Member States not recognising the system of conscientious objection and alternative service to review their legal systems. The Commission's attitude towards narrower interpretations of the right to conscientious objection is not in line with the recent development of this right before the United Nations and the European human rights institutions. It is hoped that the Inter-American human rights system will recognise the right to conscientious objection to military service in accordance with the development of the other international human rights institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Book

  • Brems E (2006) A commentary on the United Nations convention on the rights of the child: Article 14: The right to freedom of thought, Conscience and religion. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Buergenthal T, Norris R, Shelton D (1990) Protecting human rights in the Americas: selected problems, 3rd edn. NP Engel, Kehl

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (1968) Inter-American yearbook of human rights. General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris RE, Buergenthal T (1982) Human rights: The inter-American system, part 2, The legislative history of the American convention on human rights. Oceana Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson-McCarthy A (1998) The international law of human rights and States of exception: With special reference to the travaux préparatoires and case-law of the international monitoring organs. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Hitomi Takemura

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Inter-American Human Rights Law. In: Takemura, H. (eds) International Human Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Individual Duties to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70527-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics