Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry ((AGRICULTURE,volume 63))

Globally, transgenic maize comprised about 25% of the 102 million hectares of transgenic cropland planted in 2006 by more than 10 million farmers in 21 countries (James 2007). These transgenic maize plants contain inserted gene(s) expressing a variety of Cry proteins that confer resistance to stem borers and rootworms. Approximately 45% of the transgenic maize planted also contains inserted gene(s) that mediate herbicide tolerance (James 2007). Transgenic crop varieties must be granted pre-market approval by regulatory authorities, and more than 43 transgenic maize varieties have been approved to date (Agbios GM Database, http://www.agbios.com/dbase.php, accessed 14 January 2008). It must be shown that novel transgenic crops are safe for agriculture and the environment prior to their commercialization and planting. Since maize is widely used as animal feed and in human food, the pre-market regulatory approval process also evaluates the safety of transgenic maize as food and feed. This chapter describes the evolution of the regulatory paradigm and regulations applied to transgenic crops around the world with emphasis on maize, briefly highlights differences in approaches between nations, details the scientific considerations of the regulatory review process, focusing primarily on food safety issues that have been of concern to consumers around the globe, and concludes with an assessment of the consequences and impact of the stringent global regulation of transgenic crops. The chapter will also review claims regarding potential adverse effects of transgenic plants that received attention in the media and which have shaped negative public perceptions about transgenic crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berche P (1998) Les plantes transgéniques et la resistance aux antibiotiques. Méd Thérap 4:709– 719

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford KJ, Van Deynze A, Gutterson N, Parrott W, Strauss SH (2005) Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nat Biotechnol 23:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breiteneder H, Mills CEN (2005) Plant food allergens — structural and functional aspects of aller genicity. Biotechnol Adv 23:395–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006) Global impact of biotech crops: socio-economic and environmen tal effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum 9:139–151. http://www. agbioforum.org. Accessed 14 January 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Calva, JJ, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Cerón C (1996) Antimicrobial resistance in fecal flora: longitudinal community-based surveillance of children from urban Mexico. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:1699–1702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole GS, Beckmann M, Enot DP, Mondhe M, Zywicki B, Taylor J, Hardy N, Smith A, King RD, Kell DB, Fiehn O, Draper J (2005) Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:14458–14462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cellini F, Chesson A, Colquhoun I, Constable A, Davies HV, Engel KH, Gatehouse AM, Karenlampi S, Kok EJ, Leguay JJ, Lehesranta S, Noteborn HP, Pedersen J, Smith M (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42: 1089–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chassy B (2002) Safety and regulatory assessment of crops developed via biotechnology. J Am Coll Nutr 21:166S–173S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chassy BM (2007) The history and future of GMOs in food and agriculture. Cereal Foods World 52:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassy B, Abramson SH, Bridges A, Dyer WE, Faust MA, Harlander SK, Hefle SL, Munro IC, Rice ME (2001) Evaluation of the U.S. regulatory process for crops developed through biotech nology. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassy B, Hlywka JJ, Kleter GA, Kok EJ, Kuiper HA, McGloughlin M, Munro IC, Phipps RH, Reid JE (2004) Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 3:35–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassy B, Parrott W, Roush R (2005) Crop biotechnology and the future of food: a scientific assessment. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Chassy B, Egnin M, Gao Y, Glenn K, Kleter GA, Nestel P, Newell-McGloughlin M, Phipps RH, Shillito R (2008) Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology: case studies. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Codex Alimentarius (2003) Principles for risk analysis and guidelines for safety assessment of foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius, Rome. http://www. codexalimentarius.net/web/publications.jsp?lang=en. Accessed 10 January 2008

  • Delmer DP (2005) Inaugural article: agriculture in the developing world: connecting innova tions in plant research to downstream applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15739– 15746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2007) Minutes of the 37th plenary meeting of the scientific panel on genetically modi fied organisms held on 22–23 November 2007 in Brussels (adopted on 18 December 2007 as “Annex: Analysis by the GMO panel of the PNAS publication of Rosi-Marshall et al. 2007. Tox ins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems.” http://www.efsa. europa.eu/EFSA/Event Meeting/GMO Minutes 37th plenmeet,1.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2008

  • Ewen SW, Pusztai A (1999) Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet 354:1353–1354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) (1992) Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Notice. US Federal Register 57:22,984–23,005

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs M, Gonsalves D (2007) Safety of virus-resistant transgenic plants two decades after their introduction — lessons from realistic field risk assessment studies. Ann Rev Phytopath 45:173– 202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE, Vieths S, Sampson HA, Hill D, Ebisawa M, Taylor, SL, van Ree R (2008) Aller-genicity assessment of genetically modified crops: what makes sense? Nat Biotech 26:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hathcock JN (2000) The precautionary principle — an impossible burden of proof for new products. AgBioForum 3:255–258. http://www.agbioforum.org. Accessed 14 January 2008

  • James C (2007) Executive summary ISAAA brief 35: global status of commercialized biotech/ GM crops: 2006. ISAAA, Ithaca. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/35/ executivesummary/default.html. Accessed 14 Jan 2008

  • Kalaitzandonakes N (2000) Why does biotech regulation differ so much between the US and EU? AgBioForum 3:75–76. http://www.agbioforum.org. Accessed 14 January 2008

  • Kalaitzandonakes N, Alston J, Bradford K (2007) Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops. Nat Biotech 25:509–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok EJ, Kuiper HA (2003) Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops. Trends Biotechnol 21:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok EJ, Keijer J, Kleter GA, Kuiper HA (2008) Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 50:98–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konig A, Cockburn A, Crevel RWR, Debruyne E, Grafstroem R, Hammerling U, Kimber I, Knud-sen I, Kuiper HA, Peijnenburg AACM, Penninks AH, Poulsen M, Schauzu M, Wal JM (2004) Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1047–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper HA, Noteborn HP, Peijnenburg AA (1999) Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet 354:1315–1316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehesranta SJ, Davies HV, Shepherd LV, Nunan N, McNicol JW, Auriola S, Koistinen KM, Suoma-lainen S, Kokko HI, Karenlampi SO (2005) Comparison of tuber proteomes of potato varieties, landraces, and genetically modified lines. Plant Physiol 138:1690–1699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 399:214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (2007) GM soybeans and health safety — a controversy reexamined. Nat Biotech 25:981–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McHughen A, Smythe S (2008) US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modi fied organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnol J 6:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NAS (National Academy of Science, USA) (1987) Introduction of recombinant DNA-engineered organisms into the environment: key issues. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Environmental health and safety publications. Series on the safety of novel foods and feeds. No. 6. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of maize (Zea mays): key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and secondary plant metabolites. Environment Directorate. OECD, Paris. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/LinkTo/ NT00002F66/$FILE/JT00130429.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2008

  • Parrott W (2005) The nature of change: towards sensible regulation of transgenic crops based on lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Proc 17th Meeting National Agri cultural Biotechnology Council, Nashville, June 27–29, pp 209–220. NABC, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosi-Marshall EJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, Whiles MR, Evans-White M, Chambers C, Griffiths NA, Pokelsek J, Stephen ML (2007) Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16204–16208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assess ment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11937–11942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Séralini G-E, Cellier D, de Vendomois J (2007) New analysis of a rat feeding study with a ge netically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:596–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shewry PR, Baudo M, Lovegrove A, Powers S, Napier JA, Ward JL, Baker JM, Beale MH (2007) Are GM and conventionally bred cereals really different? Trends Food Sci Technol 18:201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SL, Hefle SL (2001) Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? J Allergy Clin Immunol 107:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Eede G, Aarts H, Buhk HJ, Corthier G, Flint HJ, Hammes W, Jacobsen B, Midtvedt T, van der Vossen J, von Wright A, Wackernagel W, Wilcks A (2004) The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1127–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce M. Chassy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chassy, B.M. (2009). Global Regulation of Transgenic Crops. In: Kriz, A.L., Larkins, B.A. (eds) Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 63. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68922-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics