Skip to main content

Principles of Vocal Fold Augmentation

  • Chapter
Operative Techniques in Laryngology

Abstract

■ Vocal fold augmentation is a commonly used surgical treatment for glottic insufficiency.

■ Key differences between vocal fold augmentation and laryngeal framework surgery:

- Vocal fold augmentation is less effective at closing large (3 mm or greater) glottal gaps, especially in the posterior membranous region of the vocal folds

- Vocal fold augmentation may be less precise than framework surgery

- Vocal fold augmentation is however, a more minimally invasive approach, and can be carried out in a clinic-based setting.

■ Vocal fold augmentation is appropriate in a variety of clinical settings, but is commonly used in the following situations:

- Temporary correction for unilateral vocal fold paralysis

- Trial correction for glottal insufficiency (as a diagnostic measure)

- Permanent correction of vocal fold atrophy (as seen in presbyphonia), vocal fold paresis (unilateral and bilateral), unilateral vocal fold paralysis

- Adjunctive vocal fold augmentation after laryngeal framework surgery (“touch up”)

- Glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold scarring/ soft tissue loss

■ A variety of injectable substances are available for vocal fold augmentation, and can be categorized into temporary (2–6 months) and long-acting/permanent (2 years or more).

- Temporary injection substances include:

· Bovine gelatin (Gelfoam, Surgifoam)

· Collagen-based products (Zyplast, Cosmoplast/ Cosmoderm, Cymetra)

· Carboxymethylcellulose (Radiesse Voice Gel)

· Hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane, Hyalaform)

- Long-lasting injection substances include:

· Autologous fat

· Calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse)

· Teflon

■ Local anesthesia is generally preferred with vocal fold augmentation (peroral or percutaneous approach), so that the patient’s voice can be used as a constant source of feedback during the procedure (Chaps. 33 and 34).

■ Augmentation is directed at the posterior and midmembranous vocal fold, along the lateral vocal fold (superior arcuate line), and at a depth of 3–5 mm.

■ Injection into the superficial lamina propria (Reinke’s space) is to be avoided.

■ Overinjection (15–30%) is recommended to compensate for resorption of the water-based component present in most injectable substances. The exception to this rule is autologous lipoinjection, which requires substantial overcorrection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Brandenburg JH (1992) Vocal cord augmentation with autogenous fat. Laryngoscope 102:495–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford CN, Martin DW, Warner TF (1984) Injectable collagen in laryngeal rehabilitation. Laryngoscope 94:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford CN, Bless DM (1986) Clinical experience with injectable collagen for vocal fold augmentation. Laryngoscope 96:863–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hertegar S, Hallen L, Laurent C et al (2004) Cross-linked hyaluronan versus collagen for injection treatment of glottal insufficiency: 2-year follow-up. Acta Otolaryngol 124:1208–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Remacle M, Marbaix E, Bertrand B, Hamoir M, van den Eeckhaut J (1990) Correction of glottic insufficiency by collagen injection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99:438–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen CA (2000) Phonosurgical vocal fold augmentation: procedures and materials. Otol Clinics North Am 33:1087–1096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen C, Gartner-Schmidt J, Casiano R et al (2007) Vocal fold augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schramm VL, May M, Lavorato AS (1978) Gelfoam paste injection for vocal cord paralysis: temporary rehabilitation of glottic incompetence. Laryngoscope 88:1268–1273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simpson CB, Amin MR (2004) Office-based procedures for the voice. Ear Nose Throat J 83(Suppl.):6–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watterson T, McFarlane SC, Menicucci AL (1990) Vibratory characteristics of Teflon-injected and noninjected paralyzed vocal folds. J Speech Hear Disord 55:61–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Principles of Vocal Fold Augmentation. In: Operative Techniques in Laryngology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68107-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68107-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25806-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68107-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics