Abstract
The design of screening-programs requires a careful evaluation of the screening population, its spectrum and prevalence of disease, the training level and motivation of the physician as well as the infrastructure for clinical and radiological work-flow, image analysis and reporting. In this respect, a close interaction between the screening participant, the radiologist and the referring partners is a key prerequisite. The design of the infrastructure has to aim at defining a consistent, reproducible and clinically practicable chain of screening recruitment, diagnostic procedures and follow-up as well as treatment recommendations (Fig. 5.1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brant-Zawadski M (2006) Cancer detection: evaluation of whole-body MR imaging versus CT and PET/CT — whole-body CT. Annual Meeting of Radiologic Society of North America 2006
Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A et al. (2006) Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience). Breast 15:44–51
Coldman AJ, Major D, Doyle GP et al. (2006) Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes. Radiology 238:809–815
Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Hendriks JH et al. (2004) Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. Radiology 231:564–570
Fuchs B, Trousdale RT, Rock MG (2005) Solitary bony metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: significance of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 187–192
Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al. (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:695–701
Grundy SM (2001) Coronary calcium as a risk factor: role in global risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1512–1515
Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. (1999) Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105
Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et al. (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355:1763–1771
Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT et al. (2005) Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol 174:466–472
Lehman C, Holt S, Peacock S et al. (2002) Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:15–20
Libby DM, Wu N, Lee IJ et al. (2006) CT screening for lung cancer: the value of short-term CT follow-up. Chest 129:1039–1042.
Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM et al. (2000) Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1308–1316
Perry N (2001) Quality Assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. On behalf of EUSOMA Working Party. Eur J Cancer 37:159–172
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200
Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311
Stephenson AJ, Chetner MP, Rourke K et al. (2004) Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol 172:58–62
van Kaick G (2006) Personal communication
Willgeroth F, Baumann M, Blaser D et al. (2005) Bavarian mammography screening program. Radiologe 45:264–268
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schoenberg, S.O., Reiser, M.F. (2008). Personnel and Structural Prerequisites for Screening-Programs. In: Reiser, M.F., van Kaick, G., Fink, C., Schoenberg, S.O. (eds) Screening and Preventive Diagnosis with Radiological Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49831-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49831-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23553-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49831-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)