Abstract
Total hip replacement revision has always been an interesting and difficult challenge for surgeons. This challenge is even bigger in presence of an infected revision, since the control of infection is one of the key element for the implant final result.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Duffy PJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS et al (2005) Evaluation of patients with pain following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 87(11):2566–2575
Duncan CP, Beauchamp C (1993) A temporary antibiotic-loaded joint replacement system for management of complex infections involving the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 24(4):751–759
Horan FT (2005) Robert Jones, Gathorne Girdlestone and excision arthroplasty of the hip. Historical notes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(1):104–106
McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Ilstrup DM (1989) Two-stage reconstruction of the total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 71(6):828–834
Morshed S, Huffman R, Ries MD (2005) Extended trochanteric osteotomy for 2-stage revision of infected total hip artrhroplasty J Arthoplasty 20(3):294–303
Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX et al (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81(5):672–683
Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I (2004) The value of hip aspiration versus biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 19(5):582–586
Bertazzoni Minelli E, Benini A, Magnan B et al (2004) Release of gentamicin and vancomycin from temporary human hip spacers in two-stage revision of infected arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(2):329–334
Magnan B, Regis D, Biscaglia R et al (2001) Preformed acrylic bone cement spacer loaded with antibiotics. Use of two-stage procedure in 10 patients because of infected hip after total replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 72(6):591–594
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Escobar, H.F., Romaña, R.T., Pérez, A.M., Márquez, J.A. (2007). Bone Loss: Does Use of the Spacer Affects it?. In: Meani, E., Romanò, C., Crosby, L., Hofmann, G., Calonego, G. (eds) Infection and Local Treatment in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47998-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47999-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)