Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medienwahl

  • Chapter
Book cover Medienpsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Auszug

Für Boris Beckers frischgebackene Ex-Freundin Lilly Kerssenberg ist der Tennisstar die Liebe ihres Lebens. Sie zürnt ihm daher nicht — auchwenn die Trennung per SMS kam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Schweiger, W. (2007). Theorien der Mediennutzung. Wiesbaden: VS. Das Buch stellt eine gute und umfassen de Einführung zur Mediennutzung dar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B. (2003). Mood management and selective exposure. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, und J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 85–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Sehr guter Überblicksartikel zur Mood-Management-Theorie.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. und Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism, and the internet. Computer and Human Behavior, 16, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel, M. (2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just world beliets. Journal of Communication, 58, 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batinic, B. und Appel, M. (2008). Hasta la vista, baby ... and see your friends soon. The impact of media exposure on peers’ media choice: Two field experiments. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1949). What “missing the newspaper” means. In P.F. Lazarsfeld und F.N. Stanton (Eds.), Communication research 1948–1949 (pp. 111–129). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, R., Riffe, D. und Zillmann, D. (1994). Mood influence on the appeal of bad news. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G. und Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli, H. (2004). Medienwirkungsforschung I. Grundlagen (3. Aufl.), Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. und Zillmann, D. (1984). Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induce excitational states. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (2007). Benchmark Internationale Telekommunikations märkte. Verfügbar unter http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/ Service/publikationen,did-211170.html [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Canary, D. J. und Spitzberg, B. H. (1993). Loneliness and media gratifications. Communication Research, 20, 800–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, F. D., Knobloch, S. und Zillmann, D. (2003). Rock, rap and rebellion: comparisons of traits predicting selective exposure to defiant music. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1643–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. und Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, Media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H. und Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, J. und Hasebrink, U. (1989). Zum Einfluss von Einstellungen auf die Auswahl von Fernsehsendungen. In J. Groebel und P. Winterhoff-Spurk (Hrsg.), Empirische Medienpsychologie (S. 45–63). München: PVU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N. (1996). Führen Computernetze in die Vereinsamung? Gruppendynamik, 27, 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N. (2000). Mediale Kommunikation in Arbeitsbeziehungen. In M. Boos, K. J. Jonas und K. Sassenberg (Hrsg.), Computervermittelte Kommunikation in Organisationen (S. 27–40). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N. (2003). Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N. und Dietmar, C. (2003). Mediatisierte Paarkommunikation: An sätze zur theoretischen Modellierung und erste qualitative Befunde. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4. Verfügbar unter http://www.qualitative-research. net/fqs-texte/3-03/3-03 doeringdietmar-d.htm [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimeren, B. van und Frees, B. (2007). Internetnutzung zwischen Pragmatismus und You-Tube-Euphorie. Media Perspektiven, 8, 362–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J. und Sawhney, M. S. (1994). Modeling goes to Hollywood: predicting individual differences in movie enjoyment. Management Science, 1151–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row und Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmförderungsanstalt (2009). Marktdaten. Verfügbar unter http://www.ffa.de/ [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokkema, T. und Knipscheer, K. (2007). Escape loneliness by going digital: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older a dults. Aging und Mental Health, 11, 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. und Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk und C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 117–140). Sage: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götzenbrucker, G. (2005). Soziale Netzwerke in Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace-Farfaglia, P., Dekkers, A., Sundararajan, B., Peters, L. und Park, S.-H. (2006). Multinational web uses and gratifications: Measuring the social impact of online community participation across national bound aries. Bectronic Commerce Research, 6, 75–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. (1974). Gratifications of television viewing and their correlates for British children. In J. G. Blumler und E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 71–92). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2005). Audience personality and the selection of media and media genres. Media Psychology, 7, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G. und Wruck, O. (2001). An Investigation into the Factors Determining the Success of Service Innovations — The Case of Motion Picture. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1. Verfügbar unter: http://www.uni-weimar.de/medien/ marketing/mitarbeiter/tht_pdfs/%5BI6%5D_Hennig-Thurau_Walsh_Wruck_AMSR_2001.pdf [26.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Schroer, J., Batinic, B., Konradt, U. und Naumann, S. (2005). Kommunizieren schüchterne Menschen lieber per E-Mail? Einflüsse der Persönlichkeit auf die Präferenz von Kommunikationsmedien. In K-H. Renner, A. Schütz und F. Machilek (Hrsg.), Internet und Persönlichkeit (S. 134–147). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., Schroer, J., Batinic, B. und Naumann, S. (2004). Do shy people prefer to send e-mail? Personality effects on communication media preferences in threatening and non-threathening situations. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. (1940). Professor quiz: A gratification study. In P. F. Lazarsfeld und F. N. Standon (Eds.), Radio and the printed page (pp. 64–93). New York: Duell, Sloan und Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. (1944). What do we really know about daytime serial listeners? In P. F. Lazarsfeld und F. N. Stanton (Eds.), Radio research 1942–1943 (pp. 3–33). New York: Duell, Sloan und Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höflich, J. R. (1996). Technisch vermittelte interperson ale Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. Cyber Psychology und Behavior, 7, 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G. und Gurevitch, M. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. und Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of mass media as ‘escape’: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Haas, H. und Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilborn, R. (1992). Television soaps. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. und Ross, S. D. (2006). An exploration of motives in sport video gaming. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 8, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch, S. und Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication, 52, 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblock-Westerwick, S. (2006). Mood management: Theory, evidence, and advancements. In J. Bryant und P. Vorderer (Eds.), The psychology of entertainment (pp. 239–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köcher, R. und Schneller, J. (2007). Qualitative Veränderung der Internetnutzung. Verfügbar unter: http://www.acta-online.de/praesentationen/acta_2007/acta_2007_Internetnutzung.pdf [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. und Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. und Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox — A Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement And Psychological Well-Being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth, M. (2007). Bundesnetzagentur. Jahresbericht 2006. Verfügbar unter http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/9009.pdf [08.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. und Stanton, F. (1942). Radio research, 1941. New York: Duell, Sloan und Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. und Stanton, F. (1944). Radio research, 1942–1943. New York: Duell, Sloan und Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. und Stanton, F. (1949). Communication research 1948–1949. New York: Harper und Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litle, P. und Zuckerman, M. (1986). Sensation seeking and music preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 575–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lull, J. (1990). Insidefamily viewing: Ethnographic research on television’s audiences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G.R. und Esses, V.M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation. Journal of Personality, 69, 583–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J.C., Ford, M.E. und Arend, R.A. (1983). Children’s strategies for controlling affective responses to aversive social experience. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matanda, M., Jenvey, V.B. und Phillips, J.G. (2004). Internet usage in adulthood: Loneliness, computer anxiety and education. Behavior Change, 21, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, L. und Ballard, M. (1999). Resting arousal, sensation seeking, and music preference. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 229–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. An introduction (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D., Blumler, J.G. und Brown, R. (1972). The television audience: a revised perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communication (pp. 135–165). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J.M. und Zillmann, D. (1987). Women’s comedy preferences during the menstrual cycle. Communication Research, 14, 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediendaten Südwest (2008). Mediendaten. Verfügbar unter http://www.mediendaten.de/ [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K.E.K. und Karppinien, P. (1983). Role of motives and attributes in consumer motion picture choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morahan-Martin, J. und Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morahan-Martin, J. und Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R.L., Stitt, C.R., Halford, J. und Finnerty, K.L., (2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment and reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckermann, G. (2001). Das Kinopublikum 1993 bis 2000. Besucherstruktur, Besucherverhalten und Image des Kinos. Media Perspektiven, 10, 514–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.B. (2003). Mood management and selective exposure. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, und J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 85–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.B. und Weaver, J.B. III (2000). An examination of factors related to sex differences in enjoyment of sadfilms. Journal of Broadcasting und Electronic Media, 44, 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmgreen, P. (1984). Der «Uses and gratifications approach». Theore tische Perspektiven und praktische Relevanz. Run dfunk und Femsehen, 32, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. und Mendelson, A.L. (2007). An exploratory study of reality appeal: Uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. Journal of Broadcasting und Bectronic Media, 51, 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prommer, E. (1999). Motive für den Kinobesuch: ein Blick in Medienbiographien. In K. Koziol und W. Hunold (Hrsg.), Forum Medienethik, 1, Kino-Spiegel des Zeitgeistes. München: KoPad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renckstorf, K. (1989). Medienn utzung als soziales Handeln. Zur Entwicklung einer handlungs theoretischen Perspektive in der empirischen (Massen-)Kommunikations-forschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 30, 314–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. und Svenning, L. (1969). Modemization among peasants: The impact of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, K.E. (1994). The Media Panel Program (MPP) and related research. In K.E. Rosengren (Ed.), Media effects and beyond: Culture, socialization and lifestyles (pp. 39–48). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, P. und Veigel, A. (2005). Was interessiert an Stars und Sternchen? Publizistik, 50, 438–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A.M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interaction of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, T.E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication und Society, 3, 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J., Davis, J.M. und Monsees, D.M. (1974). Opinion leadership in family planning. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, M. (2007). Medien wirkungsforschung (3. Aufl.). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, W. (2007). Theorien der Mediennutzung. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E.M. (1957). Person ality and movie preference. Psychological Reports, 3, 17–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.A., Williams, E. und Christie, B. (1976). Thesocial psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M.D. (2003). Allenation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescentuse of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication, 53, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, E. (1942). Invitation to music. In P.F. Lazarsfeld und F.N. Stanton (Eds.), Radio research, 1941 (pp. 140–188). New York: Duell, Sloan und Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, A.S.L. und Zhou, N. (2005). Newsgroup participants as opinion leaders and seekers on online and offline communication environments. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1186–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, F., Durante, N.-V., Gabrys, E., Koch, R. und Wailersbacher, R. (2003). Mediaplanung. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • VATM (2007). Der deutsche Telekommunikations markt — Zehn Jahre Liberalisierung im Festnetzmarkt. Verfügbar under http://www.izmf.de/download/Studien/VATM.pdf [08.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehlow, B. (2005). Time Budget 12. Verfügbar unter http://appz.sevenonemedia.de/download/publikationen/Time Budget12.pdf [25.03.2008]

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani, K.E.A. (1975). Personality/Lifestyle and TV Viewing Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples, D., Berelson, B. und Bradshaw, F.R. (1940). What reading does to people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J.B. III (1991) Exploring the links between personality and media preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1293–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J.B. III, Brosius, H.B. und Mundorf, N. (1993). Personality and movie preferences: A comparison of American and German audiences. Personality individual Difference, 14, 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J.G. und Wakshlag, J.J. (1983). A theory of television program choice. Communication Research, 10, 430–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisskirch, R.S. und Murphy, L.C. (2004). Friends, porn, and punk: sensation seeking in personal relationships, Internet activities, and music preference among college students. Addescence, 39, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M.T. und McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfradt, U. und Doll, J. (2005). Persönlichkeit und Ges chlecht als Prädiktoren der Internetnutzung. In K.-H. Renner, A. Schütz und F. Machilek (Hrsg.), Internet und Persönlichkeit (S. 148–158). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, J.E. und Johnson, K.K.P. (1993). Fashion opinion leadership, fashion innovativeness, and need for variety. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In L. Donohew, H.E. Sypher und E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. und Bryant, J. (1985). Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In D. Zillmann und J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 157–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expression and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Bernad Batinic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pädagogik und Psychologie, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040, Linz, Österreich

    Bernad Batinic  & Markus Appel  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Batinic, B. (2008). Medienwahl. In: Batinic, B., Appel, M. (eds) Medienpsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46899-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation