Skip to main content

The Use of Frogskin as a Biological Dressing for Temporary Cover of Burn Wounds

  • Chapter
Innovations in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery

Abstract

Most burns experts will agree that third degree burn wounds should be excised by the end of the first postinjury week. The wound should be closed if one is to minimize or avoid the deleterious effects of the hypermetabolic changes which occur after a major burns injury. Early excision and grafting has significantly decreased morbidity and mortality in burns patients. In selected cases, this method offers a better chance of a faster recovery, with marked reductions in metabolic consumption, as a consequence of the prompt closure of the wound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Janzekovic Z (1971) A new concept in the early excision and immediate grafting. J Trauma 10:1103–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown JB, McDowell F (1942) Massive repairs of burns with thick split skin grafts: emergency “dressings” with homografts. Ann Surg 115:658–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Artz CP, Becker JM, Sako Y (1955) Postmortem skim homografts in the treatment of extensive burns. Arch Surg 71:682–687

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuono C et al (1987) Composite autologous-allogenic skin replacement: development and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:626–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Poulsen TD et al (1991) Polyurethane film (Opsite) versus impregnated gauze (Jelonet). The treatment of burns: a prospective, randomized study. Burns 17:59–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clugston PA et al (1991) Cultured epithelial autografts: three years clinical experience with eighteen patients. J Burn Care Rehab 12:533–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J (1988) Artificial dermis form major burns. Ann Surg 208:313–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompkins RG et al (1989) Increased survival after massive thermal injuries in adults: a preliminary report using artificial skin. Crit Care Med 17:734–740

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subrahmanyam M (1996) Honey dressing versus boiled potato peel in the treatment of burns: a prospective randomized study. Burns 22:491–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eldad A et al (1997) Cryopreserved cadaveric allografts for treatment of unexcised partial thickness flame burns: clinical experience with 12 patients. Burns 23:608–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noronha C, Almeida A (2000) Local burn treatment — topical antimicrobial agents. Ann Burns Fire Disasters XIII: 216–219

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lakel A et al (2002) Substitutes cutanées. Ann Dermatol Venereol 129:1205–1210

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrenreich M, Ruszczak Z (2006) Update on tissue engineered biological dressings. Tissue Eng 12:2407–2424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gueugniaud PY et al (1997) Use of a biological film as cultured epidermal autograft support in the treatment of burns: preliminary report of a new technique. Ann Burns Fire Disasters X:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dedovic Z, Koupilovia I, Suchanek I (1998) Keratinocytes as biological dressing. Treatment of partial thickness burns in children. Ann Burns Fire Disasters XI:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fernandes M, Sridhar MS, Sangwan VS, Rao GN (2005) Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea 24:639–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bondoc CC, Burke JF (1971) Clinical experience with viable frozen human skin and a frozen skin bank. Ann Surg 174:371–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang C et al (1980) The intermingled transplantation of autografts and homografts in severe burns. Burns 6:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander J et al (1981) Treatment of severe burns with widely meshed skin autograft and meshed allograft overlay. J Trauma 21:433–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heimbach DM (1987) Early excision and grafting. Surg Clin North Am 67:93–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiu T, Burd A (2005) “Xenograft” dressing. The treatment of burns. Clin Dermatol 23:419–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Turnbull AV, Rivier C (1997) Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and endocrine responses to stress: CRF receptors, binding protein and related peptides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 215:1–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fowler GR (1889) On the transplantation of large strips of skin for covering extensive granulating surfaces, with report of a case in which human and frogskin were simultaneously used for this purpose. Ann Surg 9:179–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rickets BJ (1890) Some observations on bone and skin grafting. Transactions of the New York Medical Association, October 1890, pp 362–370

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gajiwala K, Gajiwala AL (2004) Evaluation of lyophilised, gamma-irradiated amnion as a biological dressing. Cell Tissue Bank 5:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Herndon DN, Parks DH (1986) Comparison of serial debridement and autografting and early massive excision with cadaver skin overlay. The treatment of large burns in children. J Trauma 26:149–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Heimbach DM (1988) American Burn Association Presidential Address: “We can see so far because...” J Burn Care Rehab 9:340–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Munster AM, Smith-Meek M, Sharkey P (1994) The effect of early surgical intervention on mortality and cost-effectiveness. Burn care, 1978–91. Burns 20:61–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Salisbury RE (2000) Reconstruction of the burned hand. Clin Plast Surg 27:65–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Desai MH, Rutan RL, Herndon DN (1991) Conservative treatment of scald burns is superior to early excision. J Burn Care Rehab 12:482–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Piccolo NS, Piccolo-Lobo MS, Piccolo-Daher MTS (1991) Two years in burn care — an analysis of 12,423 cases. Burns 17:490–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitiche D et al (1999) Utilisation des membranes amniotiques chez les brules — a propos de 25 cas. Ann Burns Fire Disasters XII:23–24

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wachtel TL et al (1986) B-mode ultrasonic echo determination of depth of thermal injury. Burns 12:432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Albsjorn B, Micheels J, Sorensen B (1984) Laser Doppler flow metry measurements of superficial derma, deep dermal and subdermal burns. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 18:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pruitt BA, Levine NS (1984) Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch Surg 119:312–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Herson M, Mathor MB, Ferreira MC, Bancos De Pele I (2001) Rev Bras Queim 1:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  37. De Backere ACJ (1994) Euro skin bank: large scale skin-banking in Europe based on glycerol-preservation of donor skin. Burns 20:S4–S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin SD et al (1992) Microskin autograft with pigskin xenograft overlay: a preliminary report. Burns 18:321–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Modak S et al (1986) Silver sulfadiazine impregnated biologic membranes as burn wound covers. J Burn Care Rehab 7:422–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chang L, Yang J (1998) Clinical experience of postage stamp autograft with porcine skin onlay dressing in extensive burns. Burns 24:264–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Guilbaud J (1993) Problems created by the use of cultured epithelia. Ann Med Burns Club VI:176–178

    Google Scholar 

  42. Janezic T (2001) Experience with cultured epithelial autografts. The treatment of patients with extensive full thickness thermal injuries. Ann Burns Fire Disasters XIV: 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  43. Boyce ST et al (1999) Cultured skin substitutes combined with integral artificial skin to replace native skin autograft and allograft for the closure of excised full-thickness burns. J Burn Care Rehab 20:453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sheridan RL, Thompkins RG (1999) Skin substitutes in burns. Burns 25:97–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu W et al (1996) Permanent grafting of living skin substitutes: surgical parameters to control successful results. J Burn Care Rehab 17:7–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Blondet R et al (1982) Skin preservation by programmed freezing. Br J Plast Surg 35:530–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Piccolo N, Piccolo MS, Piccolo MTS (2002) Uso de Pele de Rã com Curativo Biológico como Substituto Temporário da Pele em Queimaduras. Rev Bras Queim 2:18–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarto Piccolo, N., Sarto Piccolo, M., Sarto Piccolo, M.T. (2008). The Use of Frogskin as a Biological Dressing for Temporary Cover of Burn Wounds. In: Eisenmann-Klein, M., Neuhann-Lorenz, C. (eds) Innovations in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46326-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46326-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46321-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46326-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics