Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Litigating Guantánamo

  • Conference paper
International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See, e.g., “Airport Gun Battle Firefight Erupts as Prisoners Are Flown to Cuba,” New York Daily News, January 11, 2002, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Rumsfeld Backs Plan to Hold Captives Even if Acquitted,” New York Times, March 29, 2002, p. A18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haitian Ctr. Council v. McNary, 969 F.2d 1326 (2nd Cir. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haitian Refugee Ctr. v. Baker, 953 F.2d 1498 (11th Cir. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Decision of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States, Detainees in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, March 13, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Queen on the application of Abbasi & Anor. v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, (2002) EWCA Civ. 1598.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Two cases were filed in federal court in Washington DC and consolidated for the arguments and the decisions: Rasul v. Bush and Al Odah v. United States, 215 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2002), aff’d, 321 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Cir 2003), reversed and remanded, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Justice Stevens for the court in Rasul v. Bush No. 03-334 (June 28, 2004) quoting Justice Jackson’s dissent in Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=US&vol=345&invol=206&pageno=218) 345 U. S. 206, 218-219 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Constitutional Rights, USA

    Michael Ratner JD (president)

Authors
  1. Michael Ratner JD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Immanuelkirchstr. 3-4, 10405, Berlin, Germany

    Wolfgang Kaleck

  2. Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, 10012, New York, NY, USA

    Michael Ratner  & Peter Weiss  & 

  3. Freie Universität Berlin, Van’t-Hoff-Str. 8, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Tobias Singelnstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ratner, M. (2007). Litigating Guantánamo. In: Kaleck, W., Ratner, M., Singelnstein, T., Weiss, P. (eds) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46278-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation