Abstract
The classical de Finetti theorem provides an operational definition of the concept of an unknown probability in Bayesian probability theory, where probabilities are taken to be degrees of belief instead of objective states of nature. In this chapter, we motivate and review two results that generalize de Finetti’s theorem to the quantum mechanical setting: Namely a de Finetti theorem for quantum states and a de Finetti theorem for quantum operations. The quantum-state theorem, in a closely analogous fashion to the original de Finetti theorem, deals with exchangeable density-operator assignments and provides an operational definition of the concept of an “unknown quantum state” in quantum-state tomography. Similarly, the quantum-operation theorem gives an operational definition of an “unknown quantum operation” in quantum-process tomography. These results are especially important for a Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics, where quantum states and (at least some) quantum operations are taken to be states of belief rather than states of nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
1. C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack: J. Math. Phys. 43, 4537 (2002).
2. R. Schack, T. A. Brun, and C. M. Caves: Phys. Rev. A 64, 014305 (2001).
3. C. A. Fuchs, R. Schack, and P. F. Scudo: A de Finetti Representation Theorem for Quantum Process Tomography, to appear in Phys. Rev. A. See also arXiv:quant-ph/0307198.
4. C. A. Fuchs: Quantum States: What the Hell Are They?, posted at http://netlib.bell-labs.com/who/cafuchs.
5. C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack: Phys. Rev. A 66, 062111 (2002).
6. C. A. Fuchs: Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more), arXiv:quant-ph/0205039.
7. E. T. Jaynes, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, ed by G. L. Bretthorst (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
8. B. de Finetti: Erkenntnis 31, 169–223 (1989).
9. B. de Finetti: Theory of Probability (Wiley, New York, 1990).
10. L. J. Savage: The Foundations of Statistics (Dover, New York, 1972).
11. J. M. Bernardo and A. F. M. Smith: Bayesian Theory (Wiley, Chichester, 1994).
12. R. Jeffrey: Subjective Probability (The Real Thing), posted at http://www.princeton.edu/~bayesway/.
13. C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres: Phys. Today 53, 70 (2000); ibid 53, 14 (2000).
14. C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack: Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002).
15. C. M. Caves and C. A. Fuchs: Quantum Information: How Much Information in a State Vector? In: The Dilemma of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen - 60 Years Later (An International Symposium in Honour of Nathan Rosen - Haifa, March 1995), ed by A. Mann and M. Revzen, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc. 12, 226 (1996).
16. T. A. Brun, C. M. Caves, and R. Schack: Phys. Rev. A 63, 042309 (2001).
17. C. A. Fuchs: J. Mod. Opt. 50, 987 (2003).
18. R. Schack: Found. Phys. 33, 1461 (2003).
19. D. M. Appleby: Facts, Values and Quanta, arXiv:quant-ph/0402015.
20. S. J. van Enk and C. A. Fuchs: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 027902 (2002); S. J. van Enk and C. A. Fuchs: Quant. Info. Comp. 2, 151 (2002).
21. C. A. Fuchs: The Anti-Växjö Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, arXiv:quant-ph/0204146.
22. C. A. Fuchs: Notes on a Paulian Idea: Foundational, Historical, Anecdotal & Forward-Looking Thoughts on the Quantum (Växjö University Press, Växjö, Sweden, 2003). See also arXiv:quant-ph/0105039.
23. A. Peres: Am. J. Phys. 52, 644 (1984).
24. N. D. Mermin: Whose Knowledge? In Quantum (Un)speakables: From Bell to Quantum Information, ed by R. A. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002).
25. T. A. Brun, J. Finkelstein, and N. D. Mermin: Phys. Rev. A 65, 032315 (2002).
26. N. D. Mermin: J. Math. Phys. 43, 4560 (2002).
27. R. W. Spekkens: In Defense of the Epistemic View of Quantum States: A Toy Theory, arXiv:quant-ph/0401052; L. Hardy: Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms, arXiv:quant-ph/0101012; O. Cohen: Classical Teleportation of Classical States, arXiv:quant-ph/0310017; R. Duvenhage: Found. Phys. 32, 1399 (2002); P. G. L. Mana: Why Can States and Measurement Outcomes Be Represented as Vectors?, arXiv:quant-ph/0305117; A. Duwell, Quantum Information Does Not Exist, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34, 479 (2003); I. Pitowski: Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 34, 395 (2003); R. Clifton, J. Bub, and H. Halvorson: Found. Phys. 33, 1561 (2003); J. Bub: Why the Quantum?, to appear in Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys., see also arXiv:quant-ph/0402149; D. M. Appleby: The Bell-Kochen-Specker Theorem, arXiv:quant-ph/0308114.
28. C. H. Bennett G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters: Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
29. D. Boschi, S. Branca, F. De Martini, L. Hardy, and S. Popescu: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998); D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger: Nature 390, 575 (1997); A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik: Science 282, 706 (1998).
30. P. W. Shor: Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
31. A. M. Steane: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996).
32. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard: Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (IEEE Press, New York, 1984) p. 175; C. H. Bennett: Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992).
33. A. Muller, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin: Nature 378, 449 (1995); W. T. Buttler, R. J. Hughes, P. G. Kwiat, S. K. Lamoreaux, G. G. Luther, G. L. Morgan, J. E. Nordholt, C. G. Peterson, and C. M. Simmons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3283 (1998); R. J. Hughes, G. L. Morgan, and C. G. Peterson: J. Mod. Opt. 47, 533 (2000).
34. K. Vogel and H. Risken: Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989).
35. D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani: Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244 (1993).
36. U. Leonhardt: Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4101 (1995).
37. Q. A. Turchette et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
38. I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen: J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455 (1997).
39. J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 390 (1997).
40. G. M. D’Ariano, P. Lo Presti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4195 (2001). See also Chap. 8 of this volume.
41. H. E. Kyburg, Jr. and H. E. Smokler, eds, Studies in Subjective Probability, 2nd edn (Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Huntington, NY, 1980).
42. For a collection of de Finetti’s original papers and their translations into English, see P. Monari and D. Cocchi, eds, Probabilità e Induzione—Induction and Probability (Biblioteca di Statistica, CLUEB, Bologna, 1993).
43. R. L. Hudson and G. R. Moody: Z. Wahrschein. verw. Geb. 33, 343 (1976).
44. R. L. Hudson: Found. Phys. 11, 805 (1981).
45. D. Petz: Prob. Th. Rel. Fields 85, 1 (1990); A. Bach: Europhys. Lett. 16, 513 (1991); L. Accardi and Y. G. Lu: Ann. Prob. 21, 1478 (1993); A. Bach: Indistinguishable Classical Particles, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, New Series, vol 44 (Springer, Berlin, 1997); R. L. Hudson: Int. J. Quant. Chem. 74, 595 (1999).
46. C. A. Fuchs and K. Jacobs: Phys. Rev. A 63, 062305 (2001).
47. D. Heath and W. Sudderth: Am. Stat. 30, 188 (1976).
48. L. Daston: Hist. Math. 21, 330 (1994).
49. T. A. Bass: The Newtonian Casino (Penguin Books, London, 1991), previously published as The Eudaemonic Pie: Or why Would Anyone Play Roulette without a Computer in His Shoe (Houghton Mifflin, New York, 1985).
50. R. N. Giere: Objective Single-Case Probabilities and the Foundations of Statistics. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, ed by P. Suppes, L. Henkin, A. Jojo, and G. C. Moisil (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973) p. 467.
51. J. S. Bell: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1987).
52. J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, eds, Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996).
53. E. T. Jaynes: Some Applications and Extensions of the de Finetti Representation Theorem. In Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques, ed by P. Goel and A. Zellner (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986) p. 31.
54. A. Peres: Phys. Rev. A 61, 022116 (2000).
55. V. Scarani, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin: Phys. Lett. A 276, 1 (2000).
56. E. Schrödinger: Proc. Cam. Philo. Soc. 32, 446 (1936).
57. E. T. Jaynes: Phys. Rev. 108, 171 (1957).
58. L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters: Phys. Lett. A 183, 14 (1993).
59. E. Størmer: J. Func. Anal. 3, 48 (1969).
60. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters: Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
61. N. D. Mermin: Phys. Today 43, 9 (1990).
62. M. Koashi, V. Bužek, and N. Imoto: Phys. Rev. A 62, 050302 (2000).
63. E. B. Davies and J. T. Lewis: Comm. Math. Phys. 17, 239 (1970).
64. K. Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations. Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 190 (1983).
65. A. Peres: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993).
66. E. Merzbacher: Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 1970); C. Cohen-Tannoudji: Quantum Mechanics, 2nd revised enlarged edition (Wiley, New York, 1977).
67. J. von Neumann: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, translated by T. A. Beyer (Princeton U. Press, Princeton, 1955); P. A. M. Dirac: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958).
68. A. S. Holevo: Prob. Info. Trans. 9, 110 (1973).
69. E. Prugovečki: Int. J. Theo. Phys. 16, 321 (1977).
70. G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, M. F. Sacchi: Informationally complete measurements and groups representation, arXiv:quant-ph/0310013.
71. J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, C. M. Caves: Symmetric Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements to appear in J. Math. Phys. (2004); see also arXiv:quant-ph/0310075.
72. For a small sampling of more recent considerations, see: G. M. D’Ariano, L. Maccone, and M. G. A. Paris: J. Phys. A 34, 93 (2001); S. Weigert: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 802 (2000); V. Bužek, G. Drobný, R. Derka, G. Adam, and H. Wiedemann: Chaos Sol. Fract. 10, 981 (1999).
73. This question appears to have been considered much earlier than the current interest: W. Band and J. L. Park: Found. Phys. 1, 133 (1970); J. L. Park and W. Band: Found. Phys. 1, 211 (1971); W. Band and J. L. Park: Found. Phys. 1, 339 (1971).
74. A. Fujiwara and H. Nagaoka: IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44, 1071 (1998).
75. One can get a feeling for this from the large review article, D. J. Aldous: Exchangeability and Related Topics. In École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XIII – 1983, ed by P. L. Hennequin, Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol 1117 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985) pp. 1–198.
76. P. Diaconis: Synthese 36, 271 (1977); P. Diaconis and D. Freedman: Ann. Prob. 8, 745 (1980).
77. G. G. Emch: Is There a Quantum de Finetti Programme? In Proceedings of the Conference: Foundations of Probability and Physics – 2, ed by A. Khrennikov (Växjö University Press, Växjö, Sweden, 2002) pp. 159–178.
78. H.-K. Lo, H. F. Chau, and M. Ardehali: Efficient Quantum Key Distribution Scheme And Proof of Its Unconditional Security, arXiv:quant-ph/0011056.
79. K. Tamaki, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167904 (2003).
80. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
81. M. A. Nielsen, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme: Nature 396, 52 (1998).
82. A. M. Childs, I. L. Chuang, and D. W. Leung: Phys. Rev. A 64, 012314 (2001).
83. Y. Nambu et al.: Experimental Investigation of Pulsed Entangled Photons and Photonic Quantum Channels. In Quantum Optics in Computing and Communications, Proceedings of SPIE, vol 4917, ed by S. Liu, G. Guo, H.-K. Lo, and N. Imoto (2002), pp. 13–24; e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0210147.
84. J. B. Altepeter et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 193601 (2003).
85. F. De Martini, A. Mazzei, M. Ricci, and G. M. D’Ariano: Phys. Rev. A 67, 062307 (2003).
86. D. W. Leung: Towards Robust Quantum Computation. PhD thesis, Stanford University (2000); e-print cs.CC/0012017.
87. D. W. Leung: J. Math. Phys. 44, 528 (2003).
88. W. Dür and J. I. Cirac: Phys. Rev. A 64, 012317 (2001).
89. G. M. D’Ariano and P. Lo Presti: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4195 (2001).
90. M.-D. Choi: Lin. Alg. App. 10, 285 (1975).
91. G. M. D’Ariano and P. Lo Presti: Imprinting a Complete Information about a Quantum Channel on Its Output State, arXiv:quant-ph/0211133; K. Życzkowski and I. Bengtsson: On duality between Quantum Maps and Quantum States, arXiv:quant-ph/0401119; P. Arrighi and C. Patricot: On Quantum Operations as Quantum States, arXiv:quant-ph/0307024; J. Oppenheim and B. Reznik: A Probabilistic and Information Theoretic Interpretation of Quantum Evolutions, arXiv:quant-ph/0312149; A. Fujiwara and P. Algoet, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3290–3294 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuchs, C.A., Schack, R. 5 Unknown Quantum States and Operations,a Bayesian View. In: Paris, M., Řeháček, J. (eds) Quantum State Estimation. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 649. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44481-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44481-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22329-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44481-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive