Skip to main content

Part of the book series: X.media.press ((XMEDIAP))

  • 21k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Ein Bild sagt mehr als tausend Worte. Schon allein dieser Satz drückt aus, dass Bildern eine wichtige Rolle im Lernprozess zugesprochen wird. Bei der Auswahl eines Lehrbuches für ein Seminar oder für den schulischen Unterricht wird man vielleicht durch das Buch blättern und sich einen Überblick verschaffen. Ein Kriterium für die Auswahl könnte die Anzahl der vorhandenen Bilder sein, weil das Buch so ansprechender aussieht als eines, das nur mit Text beschriebene Seiten enthält.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. (2005). The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 135.-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working Memory. Science, 255, 556.-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballstaedt, S.-P. (1997). Wissensvermittlung. Die Gestaltung von Lehrmaterial. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R. (1953). A theoretical orientation for instruction film research. AV Communication Review, 1, 38.-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2002). ELearning and the science of instruction. Proven Guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewiak, U. (1992). Lernen mit Bildern in Texten. Münster, New York: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchastel, P. C. & Waller, R. (1979). Pictorial illustration in instructional texts. Educational Technology, 19, 20.-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. M. (1975). Effect of students entering behavior on visualized instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 78.-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. Pennsylvania: Learning Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. D. & Tobias, S. (2005). The Multimedia Principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 117.-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B. (1996). Wahrnehmungspsychologie: Eine Einführung. Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Wahrnehmungspsychologie: Eine Einführung. Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A. (1996). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In T. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume 2 (pp. 641.-668). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 32.-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kösler, B. (1990). Gebrauchsanweisungen richtig und sicher gestalten. Forschungsergebnisse für die Gestaltung von Gebrauchsanleitungen. Wiesbaden: Forkel-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A. & Caterino, L. C. (1994). Reference maps as a framework for remembering text. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 153.-162). Amsterdam, London: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195.-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1986). Four cognitive principles of learning-strategy instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 3.-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J. & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validation functions of picture in prose. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The Psychology of Illustration. Vol. 2: Basic Research (Vol. 2, pp. 51.-85). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding Illustrations in Text. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43.-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1.-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005a). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 31.-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 183.-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64.-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W. (1946). Signs, languages and behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding-approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeck, J. (1987). The role of illustrations in processing and remembering illustrated text. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Vol. 1 Basic research (pp. 115.-151). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, graphics, & learning. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (2000). Computers, graphics and learning. Abruf am 14.09.2006, http://www.nowhereroad.com/cgl/copyright.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. (1915). Synoplevde Figurer. Kopenhagen: Gyldendalske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (2002). Wissenserwerb mit Texten, Bildern und Diagrammen. In L. J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Hrsg.), Information und Lernen mit Multimedia und Internet (3. Aufl., S. 65.-81). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (2005). An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 49.-70). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (2006). Pädagogische Psychologie. Workbook. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141.-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T. & Brünken, R. (2006). Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 321.-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strittmatter, P. & Niegemann, H. (2000). Lehren und Lernen mit Medien. Eine Einführung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2005). The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 159.-168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. (1979). Four aspects of graphic communication. Instructional science, 8, 213.-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (1993). Informierende Bilder. In B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Wissenserwerb mit Bildern (S. 9.-58). Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (1994a). Lernen mit Bildmedien. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (1994b). Wissenserwerb mit Bildern. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (2006). Lernen mit Medien. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 423.-476). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Bilder. In: Kompendium multimediales Lernen. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37226-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics