This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Bub, Interpreting the Quantum World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997), p 212
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000)
M. Schlosshauer, “Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal no-collapse quantum mechanics,” Annals of Physics 321, 112–149 (2006)
For more detailed reviews of decoherence, we recommend the following. For a review paper that that deals comprehensively with many of the more technical aspects of decoherence, including an overview of recent experimental advances, see W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,” Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 715–775 (2003). E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch, and I.-O. Stamatescu, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, 2nd edn (Springer, New York 2003) provides an extensive description of the decoherence program as a whole. Finally, a recent review paper of one of us discusses in great detail the foundational implications of decoherence: M. Schlosshauer, “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 1267–1305 (2004).
E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, “The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment,” Zeitschrift für Physik B 59, 223–243 (1985); M. Tegmark, “Apparent wave function collapse caused by scattering,” Foundations of Physics Letters 6, 571–590 (1993)
H.-D. Zeh, “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory,” Foundations of Physics 1, 69–76 (1970). H.-D. Zeh, “The problem of conscious observation in quantum mechanical description,” Foundation of Physics Letters 13, 221–233 (2000). N. P. Landsman, “Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26, 45–73 (1995)
J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin 1932)
Joos and Zeh, “The emergence of classical properties” (Ref 5)
An overview of such experiments involving mesoscopic “Schrödinger kittens” can be found in Schlosshauer, “Experimental motivation and empirical consistency” (Ref 3).
W. H. Zurek, “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?,” Physical Review D 24, 1516–1525 (1981), p 1519
W. H. Zurek, “Preferred states, predictabilty, classicality, and the environment-induced decoherence,” Progress of Theoretical Physics 89, 281–312 (1993). W. H. Zurek, S. Habib, and J. P. Paz, “Coherent states via decoherence,” Physical Review Letters 70, 1187–1190 (1993)
Zurek, “Preferred states” (Ref 11); Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the existential interpretation” (The Rough Guide),” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 356, 1793–1821 (1998); Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical” (Ref 4); and Zurek, et al., “Coherent states via decoherence” (Ref 11)
O. Pessoa, Jr., “Can the decoherence approach help to solve the measurement problem?,” Synthese 113, 323–346 (1999), p 432
Landsman, “Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics” (Ref 6) pp 45–46
H. Everett, “‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–462 (1957)
B. van Fraassen, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991)
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,” Physical Review D 34, 470–491 (1986)
R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Journal of Statistical Physics 36, 219–272 (1984). For a review see R. Omnès, “Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics 64, 339–382 (1992).
D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’,” I and II, Physical Review 85, 166–193 (1952). D. Bohm and J. Bub, “A proposed solution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics by a hidden variable theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 453–469 (1966)
For a more detailed treatment, see Schlosshauer, “Decoherence” (Ref 4).
See, for example, Joos and Zeh, “The emergence of classical properties” (Ref 5); W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the existential interpretation” (Ref 12); M. Tegmark, “The interpretation of quantum mechanics: Many worlds or many words?,” Fortschritte der Physik 46, 855–862 (1998); Zeh, “The problem of conscious observation” (Ref 6); H.-D. Zeh, “Toward a quantum theory of observation,” Foundations of Physics 3, 109–116 (1973); and Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical” (Ref 4).
M. Tegmark, “Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes,” Physical Review E 61, 4194–4206 (2000)
J. S. Bell, “Against ‘measurement’,” in A. I. Miller (ed), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty (Plenum Press, New York 1990) pp 17–31
A. Kent, “Against many worlds interpretations,” International Journal of Modern Physics A 5, 1745 (1990); and Zeh, “Toward a quantum theory of observation,” (Ref 21)
B. d’Espagnat, “A note on measurement,” Physics Letters A 282, 133–137 (2000); D. Wallace, “Everett and structure,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 87–105 (2003)
D. Dieks, “Modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurements, and macroscopic behavior,” Physical Review A 49, 2290–2300 (1994); D. Dieks, “Objectification, measurement and classical limit according to the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in I. Busch, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt (eds), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore 1994) pp 160–167
M. Hemmo, Quantum Mechanics Without Collapse: Modal Interpretations, Histories and Many Worlds, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Department of History and Philosophy of Science (1996); G. Bacciagaluppi and M. Hemmo, “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 239–277 (1996)
G. Bene, “Quantum origin of classical properties within the modal interpretations,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0104112 (2001); and Bacciagaluppi and Hemmo, “Modal interpretations” (Ref 27)
G. Bacciagaluppi, “Delocalized properties in the modal interpretation of a continuous model of decoherence,” Foundations of Physics 30, 1431–1444 (2000)
M. Donald, “Discontinuity and continuity of definite properties in the modal interpretation,” in D. Dieks and P. Vermaas (eds), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1998) pp 213–222
Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber, “Unified dynamics” (Ref 17)
J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, “Quantum limit of decoherence: Environment induced superselection of energy eigenstates,” Physical Review Letters 82, 5181–5185 (1999)
J. R. Friedman, V. Patel, W. Chen, S. K. Yolpygo, and J. E. Lukens, “Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,” Nature 406, 43–46 (2000)
E. Joos, “Comment on ‘Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems’,” Physical Review D 36, 3285–3286 (1987)
A. I. M. Rae, “Can GRW theory be tested by experiments on SQUIDS?,” Journal of Physics A 23, L57–L60 (1990); E. J. Squires, “Wavefunction collapse and ultraviolet photons,” Physics Letters A 158, 431–432 (1991)
F. Benatti, G. C. Ghirardi, and R. Grassi, “Quantum mechanics with spontaneous localization and experiments,” in E. G. Beltrametti and J.-M. Lévy-Leblond (eds), Advances in Quantum Phenomena (Plenum Press, New York 1995); and Tegmark, “Apparent wave function collapse” (Ref 5)
A. Albrecht, “Following a ‘collapsing’ wave function,” Physical Review D 48, 3768–3778 (1993); F. Dowker and A. Kent, “Properties of consistent histories, Physical Review Letters 75, 3038–3041 (1995); F. Dowker and A. Kent, “On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics,” Journal of Statistical Physics 82, 1575–1646 (1996); M. Gell-Mann and J. Hartle, “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology,” in S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama and S. Nomura (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology (Tokyo, Japan, August 1989) (Physical Society of Japan, Tokio 1990) pp 321–343; J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, “Environment-induced decoherence, classicality and consistency of quantum histories,” Physical Review D 48, 2728–2738 (1993); and Zurek, “Preferred states” (Ref 11)
See, for example, Gell-Mann and Hartle, “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology” H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama and S. Nomura (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology (Tokyo, Japan, August 1989) (Physical Society of Japan, Tokio 1990) pp 321–343 (Ref 37); F. Dowker and J. J. Halliwell, “Quantum mechanics of history: The decoherence functional in quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D 46, 1580–1609 (1992); A. Albrecht, “Investigating decoherence in a simple system,” Physical Review D 46, 5504–5520 (1992); Albrecht, “Following a ‘collapsing’ wave function” (Ref 37); Zurek, “Preferred states” (Ref 11); Paz and Zurek, “Environment-induced decoherence” (Ref 37); J. Twamley, “Phase-space decoherence: A comparison between consistent histories and environment-induced super-selection,” Physical Review D 48, 5730–5745 (1993); J. Finkelstein, “On the definition of decoherence,” Physical Review D 47, 5430—5433 (1993); C. Anastopoulos, “Decoherence and classical predictability of phase space histories,” Physical Review E 53, 4711–4728 (1996); M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, “Strong decoherence,” in D. H. Feng and B. L. Hu (eds), Quantum Classical Correspondence: The 4th Drexel Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability (International Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1998) pp 3–35; and J. J. Halliwell, “Decoherent histories for spacetime domains,” in J. G. Muga, R. S. Mayato and I. L. Egususquiza (eds), Time in Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin 2001).
Albrecht, “Investigating decoherence” (Ref 38); Albrecht, “Following a ‘collapsing’ wave function” (Ref 37); Gell-Mann and Hartle, “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology” (Ref 37); Griffiths, “Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics” (Ref 18); Omnès, “Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics” (Ref 18); R. Omnès, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994); Paz and Zurek, “Environment-induced decoherence” (Ref 37); Twamley “Phase-space decoherence” (Ref 38); and Zurek, “Preferred states” (Ref 11)
H.-D. Zeh, “There are no quantum jumps, nor are there particles!,” Physics Letters A 172, 189–192 (1993); H.-D. Zeh, “Why Bohm’s quantum theory?,” Foundations of Physics Letters 12, 197 (1999); H.-D. Zeh, “There is no ‘first’ quantization,” Physics Letters A 309, 329–334 (2003)
D. Bohm and B. Hiley, The Undivided Universe (Routledge, London 1993)
V. Allori, Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics, PhD thesis, Physics Department, University of Genova (2001); V. Allori, D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, “Seven steps towards the classical world,” Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 4, S482–S488 (2002); V, Allori, and N. Zanghì, “On the classical limit of quantum mechanics,” Biannual IQSA Meeting (Cesena, Italy, 2001), http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112009; D. M. Appleby, “Bohmian trajectories of an isolated particle,” Foundations of Physics 29, 1863–1884 (1999); A. S. Sanz and F. Borondo, “A Bohmian view on quantum decoherence,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0310096 (2003); and Zeh, “Why Bohm’s quantum theory?” (Ref 40)
Tegmark, “The interpretation of quantum mechanics: Many worlds or many words?” (Ref 21), p 855
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlosshauer, M., Fine, A. (2007). Decoherence and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. In: Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32665-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32665-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32663-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32665-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)