Abstract
The past 30 years have seen dramatic changes in the diagnosis and management of breast problems. Much of this change has been driven by the quest for early diagnosis and by the widespread use of imaging in the diagnosis of symptomatic breast disease and for breast cancer screening. The traditional approach of surgical biopsy for diagnosis has now been replaced by needle biopsy techniques that provide both accurate and reliable diagnosis. The aims are to prevent unnecessary surgery for benign processes and to provide detailed information on borderline and malignant processes that allow for prospective fully informed treatment planning (Teh et al. 1998). To achieve these aims, specialized techniques for needle biopsy of the breast have been developed that facilitate the removal of sufficient amounts of tissue required to ensure accurate diagnoses. In the 1980s, the predominant technique for needle sampling of the breast was fine-needle aspiration for cytology (FNAC). The results achieved with FNAC were encouraging but the required reliability and acceptable sensitivity and specificity proved to be only achievable in expert centers. Even then, false-negative results for sampling in situ disease represented by microcalcifications and for certain types of invasive breast cancer were disappointing. For this reason, in the 1990s there was a trend away from the use of FNAC to needle core biopsy techniques. Core biopsy provides histological material for morphological as well as cellular assessment and the skills required for interpretation are much more widely available. The sensitivity for the more elusive disease, such as lobular invasive carcinoma, is also significantly better. In addition, when sampling microcalcifications, core samples can be imaged to prove retrieval of representative tissue. Overall, compared to cytology, core biopsy histology provides significantly better sensitivity and positive predictive values for both benign and malignant disease and has a reduced rate of false-negative results. Automated core biopsy is now accepted as the preferred technique for breast tissue sampling (Bassett et al. 1997; Teh et al. 1998; Litherland 2001; Parker et al. 1996; Schueller et al. 2008).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bassett L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB et al (1997) Stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the joint task force of the American College of Surgeons and College of American Pathologists. CA Cancer J Clin 47:171
Burbank F (1993) Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-guage mammotome probe. Acta Cytol 37:461–471
Carder PJ, Khan T, Burrows P, Sharma N (2008) Large volume mammotome biopsy may reduce the need for diagnostic surgery in papillary lesions of the breast. J Clin Pathol 61:928–933
Eby PR, Ochsner JE, DeMartini WB, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2008) Is surgical excision necessary for focal atypical ductal hyperplasia found at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Annu Surg Oncol 15;3232–3238
Georgian-Smith D, D’Orsi C, Morris E, Clark CF, Liberty E, Lehman CD (2002) Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using an upright unit, a vacuum suction needle, and a lateral arm support. AJR 178:1017–1024
Intact Medical Corporation (2008) Percutaneous contiguous electrosurgical breast biopsy devices. http://www.intactmedical.com/pdf/ML087_Rev00.pdf
Kellebrew LK, Oneson RH (2006) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience. Breast 12:302–308
Kettritz U et al (2003) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicentre study. Cancer 100:245–251
Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer of clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378
Lee K-M, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, Liberman L (2008) Complete excision of the MRI target lesion at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast cancer. AJR 191:1198–1202
Liberman L (2000) Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR 174:1191–1199
Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD (2005) MRI-guided 9-guage vacuum assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR 185:183–193
Litherland J (2001) The role of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Breast 10:383–387
Parker SH, Burbank F (1996) A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 200:11–20
Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman J, Aucreman CJ, Cardenosa G, Clink TM et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 3:359–363
Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK (2006) A new breast biopsy technique. J Diagn Med Sonogr 12:113–118
Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR 180:347–351
Rosen EL, Bentley RC, Baker JA, Soo MS (2002) Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR 179:1185–1192
Schueller G et al (2008) US-guided 14 gauge core needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406–413
Sie A et al (2006) Multi-center evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer 107:945–949
Teh W, Evans AJ, Wilson ARM (1998) Editorial. Definitive non-surgical breast diagnosis: the role of the radiologist. Clin Radiol 53:81–84
Tennant SL, Evans AJ, Hamilton LJ, James J, Lee AH, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Rakha EA, Wilson AR (2008) Vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) - an alternative to surgery in selected cases. Breast 17(6):546–549
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, R., Kavia, S. (2009). Comparison of Large-Core Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy and Excision Systems. In: Brun del Re, R. (eds) Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsies. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31611-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31611-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31403-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31611-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)