Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe pp 167–174Cite as

Misgav-Ladach-Sektio (»Der sanfte Kaiserschnitt«)

  • Chapter

  • 2359 Accesses

Auszug

Jedes operative Verfahren setzt sich aus Hunderten von Bewegungen zusammen. Jede hat eine Herkunft und eine Geschichte, jede dient einem bestimmten Zweck und sollte einen bestimmten Ausführungsweg haben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ansaloni L, Brundisini R, Morino G, Kiura A (2001) Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya. World J Surg 25(9): 1164–1172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ejörklund K, Kimaro M, Urassa E, Lindmark G (2000) Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal Obstet Gynecol 107(2): 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borso A (1957) Dehiscence of hysterotomy wounds after cesarean section performed with longitudinal incision of the lower segment. Minerva Ginecol 15;9(17): 742–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier R J (2002) The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6): 1326–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC (1997) One-versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 89(1): 16–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Csucs L, Kott I, Solt I (1972) Mono-layer sutures of uterine incision in cesarean section based on clinical experience and animal experiments. Zentralbl Gynäkol 26;94(34): 1121–1126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Darj E, Nordström ML (1999) The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78: 37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Down RH, Whitehead R, Watts JM (1980) Why do surgical packs cause peritoneal adhesions ? Aust N Z J Surg 50(1): 83–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis H (1980) Internal overhealing: the problem of intraperitoneal adhesions. World J Surg 4: 303–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M (1997) Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynecol Obstet 57(3): 273–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis RO (1992) Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 1108–1111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hershey DW, Quilligan EJ (1978) Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 52(2): 189–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewitt J (1961) J.M. Munro Kerr. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 68: 510–514

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohlagschwandtner M, Ruecklinger E, Husslein P, Joura E A (2001) Is the formation of a bladder flap at caesarean necessary ? A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 98(6): 1089–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jelsema RD, Wittingen JA, Vander Kolk KJ (1993) Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low transverse uterine incision. J Reprod Med 38(5): 393–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsen B, Davis B (1984) Enhancement of the antibacterial property of amniotic fluid by hyperthermia. Obstet Gynecol 63(3): 425–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen B, Galask RP (1975) Host resistance to intraamniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol Surv 30(10): 675–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lasley DS, Eblen A, Yancey MK, Duff P (1997) The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176(6): 1250–1254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, M, Zou L, Zhu J (2001) Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section. J Tongji Med Univ 21(1): 75–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindholt JS, Moller-Christensen T, Steele R E (1994) The cosmetic outcome of the scar formation after cesarean section: percutaneous or intracutaneous suture? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73(10): 832–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowenwirt IP, Chi D S, Handwerker SM (1994) Nonfatal venous air embolism during cesarean section: a case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 49(1): 72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meininger D, Byhahn C, Kessler P et al. (2003) Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 96(3): 852–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreira P, Moreau JC, Faye ME et al. (2002) Comparison of two cesarean techniques: classic versus Misgav Ladach cesarean. J Gynecol Obstet Reprod 31(6): 572–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mowat J, Bonnar J (1971) Abdominal wound dehiscence after caesarean section. Br Med J 2(756): 256–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Neeser E, Niehues U, Hirsch HA (1988) Maternal morbidity following cesarean section. Comparison of isthmocorpus longitudinal section and isthmian transverse section in premature labor. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 48(1): 8–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfannenstiel J (1897) Über die Vorteile des suprasymphysären Faszienquerschnitts für die gynäkologischen Koliotomien zugleich ein Beitrag zu der Indikationsstellung der Operationswege. Samml Klein Vortr Gynäkol 68–98 (Klin Vortr NF Gynäk 1900; 97: 268)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2002) Peritoneal Closure Guideline no. 15, July

    Google Scholar 

  28. Setayesh AR, Kholdebarin AR, Moghadam MS, Setayesh HR (2001) The Trendelenburg position increases the spread and accelerates the onset of epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section. Can J Anaesth 48(9): 890–893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stark M (1993) Clinical evidence that suturing the peritoneum after laparotomy is unnecessary for healing World J Surg 17(3): 419

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stark M (1994) Technique of caesarean section: Misgav Ladach method. In: Popkin DR, Peddle L J (eds) Women`s Health Today. Perspectives on current research and clinical practice. Proceedings of the XIV. World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Montreal. Parthenon, New York, 81–85

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR (1995) Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 48(3): 273–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stark M, Finkel AR (1994) Comparison between the JoelCohen and Pfannestiel incision in caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 53: 121–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgkins P, Owen J, Winkler CL (1993) Trial of labor after a one-or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 168(2): 545–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wahab MA, Karantzis P, Eccersley PS, Russell IF, Thompson J W (1999) A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9): 913–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkinson C, Enkin MW (2000) Manual removal of placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD000130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NESA New European Surgical Academy, Karower Str. 11/214, 13125, Berlin

    Prof. h.c. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Michael Stark

Authors
  1. Prof. h.c. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Michael Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stark, M. (2007). Misgav-Ladach-Sektio (»Der sanfte Kaiserschnitt«). In: Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30098-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30098-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30097-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30098-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation