Skip to main content

Deception in Ant Colony Optimization

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3172))

Abstract

The search process of a metaheuristic is sometimes misled. This may be caused by features of the tackled problem instance, by features of the algorithm, or by the chosen solution representation. In the field of evolutionary computation, the first case is called deception and the second case is referred to as bias. In this work we formalize the notions of deception and bias for ant colony optimization. We formally define first order deception in ant colony optimization, which corresponds to deception as being described in evolutionary computation. Furthermore, we formally define second order deception in ant colony optimization, which corresponds to the bias introduced by components of the algorithm in evolutionary computation. We show by means of an example that second order deception is a potential problem in ant colony optimization algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blum, C.: Theoretical and practical aspects of ant colony optimization. PhD thesis, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, C., Dorigo, M.: The hyper-cube framework for ant colony optimization. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B 34(2), 1161–1172 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, C., Sampels, M.: Ant Colony Optimization for FOP shop scheduling: A case study on different pheromone representations. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2002), vol. 2, pp. 1558–1563. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, C., Sampels, M.: When model bias is stronger than selection pressure. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 893–902. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Blum, C., Sampels, M., Zlochin, M.: On a particularity in model-based search. In: Langdon, W.B., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2002), pp. 35–42. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colorni, A., Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Trubian, M.: Ant System for job-shop scheduling. JORBEL – Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics and Computer Science 34(1), 39–53 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Goldberg, D.E.: Analyzing deception in trap functions. In: Whitley, L.D. (ed.) Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, vol. 2, pp. 93–108. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorigo, M.: Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms (in Italian). PhD thesis, Dip. di Elettronica, Politecnico di Milano, Italy (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A.: Positive feedback as a search strategy. Technical Report 91-016, Dip. di Elettronica, Politecnico di Milano, Italy (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A.: Ant System: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B 26(1), 29–41 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorigo, M., Stützle, T.: Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg, D.E.: Simple genetic algorithms and the minimal deceptive problem. In: Davis, L. (ed.) Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing, Pitman, London, UK, pp. 74–88 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merkle, D., Middendorf, M.: Modelling ACO: Composed permutation problems. In: Dorigo, M., Di Caro, G.A., Sampels, M. (eds.) Ant Algorithms 2002. LNCS, vol. 2463, pp. 149–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Merkle, D., Middendorf, M.: Modelling the dynamics of ant colony optimization algorithms. Evolutionary Computation 10(3), 235–262 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nowicki, E., Smutnicki, C.: A fast taboo search algorithm for the job-shop problem. Management Science 42(2), 797–813 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothlauf, F., Goldberg, D.E.: Prüfer numbers and genetic algorithms: A lesson on how the low locality of an encoding can harm the performance of GAs. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 395–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blum, C., Dorigo, M. (2004). Deception in Ant Colony Optimization. In: Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., Blum, C., Gambardella, L.M., Mondada, F., Stützle, T. (eds) Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28646-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28646-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22672-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28646-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics