Skip to main content

Characterizing EF and EX Tree Logics

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3170))

Abstract

We characterize the expressive power of EX, EF and EX+EF logics. These are the fragments of CTL built using the respective operators. We give a forbidden pattern characterization of the tree languages definable in these logics. The characterizations give optimal algorithms for deciding if a given tree language is expressible in one of the three logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: ‘Sometimes’ and ‘not never’ revisited: on branching versus linear time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Esparza, J.: Decidability of model-checking for infinite-state concurrent systems. Acta Informatica 34, 85–107 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, M., Ladner, R.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 18, 194–211 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Franceschet, M., Afanasiev, L., de Rijke, M., Marx, M.: CTL model checking for processing simple XPath queries. In: Temporal Presentation and Reasoning

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koch, C., Gottlob, G.: Monadic queries over tree-structured data. In: Logic in Computer Science, pp. 189–202 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hafer, T., Thomas, W.: Computation tree logic CTL and path quantifiers in the monadic theory of the binary tree. In: Ottmann, T. (ed.) ICALP 1987. LNCS, vol. 267, pp. 260–279. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Heuter, U.: First-order properties of trees, star-free expressions, and aperiodicity. In: Cori, R., Wirsing, M. (eds.) STACS 1988. LNCS, vol. 294, pp. 136–148. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Neven, F.: Automata, logic, and XML. In: Bradfield, J.C. (ed.) CSL 2002 and EACSL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2471, pp. 2–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Niwiński, D.: Fixed points vs. infinte generation. In: Logic in Computer Science, pp. 402–409 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Otto, M.: Eliminating recursion in the μ-calculus. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 531–540. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Potthoff, A.: First-order logic on finite trees. In: Mosses, P.D., Schwartzbach, M.I., Nielsen, M. (eds.) CAAP 1995, FASE 1995, and TAPSOFT 1995. LNCS, vol. 915, pp. 125–139. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schützenberger, M.P.: On finite monoids having only trivial subgroups. Information and Control 8, 190–194 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidl, H.: Deciding equivalence of finite tree automata. SIAM Journal of Computing 19, 424–437 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Straubing, H.: Finite Automata, Formal Languages, and Circuit Complexity. Birkhäuser, Boston (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Thatcher, J.W., Wright, J.B.: Generalized finite automata theory with an application to a decision problem of second-order logic. Mathematical Systems Theory 2(1), 57–81 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Walukiewicz, I.: Model checking CTL properties of pushdown systems. In: Kapoor, S., Prasad, S. (eds.) FST TCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1974, pp. 127–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Walukiewicz, I.: Deciding low levels of tree-automata hierarchy. In: Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Computation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 67 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilke, T.: Classifying discrete temporal properties. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bojańczyk, M., Walukiewicz, I. (2004). Characterizing EF and EX Tree Logics. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds) CONCUR 2004 - Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28644-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22940-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28644-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics