Skip to main content

Agent Autonomy Through the 3 M Motivational Taxonomy

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2969))

Abstract

The concept of autonomy applied to computational agents refers to the ability of an agent to act without the direct intervention of human users in the selection and satisfaction of goals. Actual implementations of mechanisms to enable agents to display autonomy are, however, at an early stage of development and much remains to be done to fully explicate the issues involved in the development of such mechanisms. Motivation has been used by several researchers as such an enabler of autonomy in agents. In this paper we describe a motivational taxonomy, the 3 M Taxonomy, comprising domain, social and constraint motivations, which we argue is a sufficient range of motivations to enable autonomy in all the main aspects of agent activity. Underlying this taxonomy is a motivational model that describes how motivation can be used to bias an agent’s activities towards that which is important in a given context, and also how motivational influence can be dynamically altered through the use of motivational cues, that are features in the environment that signify important situations to an agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coddington, A.M., Luck, M.: Towards motivaiton-based plan evaluation. In: Russell, I., Haller, S. (eds.) Proceedings of Sixteenth International FLAIRS conference, pp. 298–302 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Lioncourt, S., Luck, M.: Motivating intelligent agents for virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Virtual Agents Workshop, Salford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. d’Inverno, M., Luck, M.: Understanding Agent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferber, J.: Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths, N.: Motivated Cooperation. PhD thesis, University of Warwick (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez y Lopez, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luck, M., Munroe, S., d’Inverno, M.: Autonomy: Variable and generative. In: Castelfranchi, C., Hexmoor, H., Falcone, R. (eds.) Agent Autonomy, pp. 9–22. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maes, P.: How to do the right thing. Connection Science 1(3) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, T.J., Long, D.: Goal creation in motivated agents. In: Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) Intelligent Agents. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 890, pp. 277–290. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon, H.A.: Models of Thought. Yale University Press, New Haven (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sloman, A.: Motives, mechanisms, and emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1, 217–233 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sloman, A., Croucher, M.: Why robots will have emotions. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, B.C, pp. 197–202 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spier, E., McFarland, D.: A finer-grained motivational model of behaviour sequencing. In: From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the fourth conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner, T., Lesser, V.: Relating quantified motivations for organizationally situated. In: Jennings, N.R., Lesperance, Y. (eds.) Intelligent Agents VI — Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. LNCS (LNAI), pp. 334–348. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2), 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Munroe, S., Luck, M. (2004). Agent Autonomy Through the 3 M Motivational Taxonomy. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds) Agents and Computational Autonomy. AUTONOMY 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22477-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25928-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics