Abstract
Taxonomists classify biological specimens into groups (taxa) on the basis of similarities between their observed features (‘characters’). The description of these ‘characters’ is therefore central to taxonomy, but there is currently no agreed model, defined terminology nor methodology for composing these descriptions. This lack of a common conceptual model, together with the individualistic working practices of taxonomists, means that descriptions are not composed consistently, and are not easy to interpret and re-use, nor are datasets comparable. The purpose of the Prometheus II project is to improve the interpretation and comparison of plant descriptions. To this end we propose a new conceptual model for unambiguously representing character descriptions, and have developed a controlled vocabulary as an ontology of defined terms, which will be used to describe specimens according to our character model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wilkinson, M.: A comparison of two methods of character construction. Cladistics 11, 297–308 (1995)
Cannon, A., McDonald, S.M.: Prometheus II - Qualitative Research Case Study: Capturing and relating character concepts in plant taxonomy (2001), www.prometheusdb.org/resources.html
Colless, D. H.: On ’character’ and related terms. Systematic Zoology 34, 229–233(1995); Keogh, J.S.: The importance of systematics in understanding the biodiversity crisis: the role of biological educators. Journal of Biol. Educ. 29 , 293–299 (1995)
Diederich, J., Fortuner, R., Milton, J.: Construction and integration of large character sets for nematode morpho-anatomical data. Fundamental and Applied Nematology 20, 409–424 (1997)
DELTA: Dallwitz, M.J.: A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon 29, 41–46 (1980)
NEXUS: Maddison, D.R., Swofford, D.L., Maddison, W.P.: NEXUS: An extensible file format for systematic information. Systematic Biology 46, 590–621 (1997)
LUCID: Developed by Centre for Biological Information Technology: University of Queensland, Australia, www.cpitt.uq.edu.au , www.lucidcentral.com
Davis, P.H., Heywood, V.H.: Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Oliver and Boyd Edinburgh (1963)
TDWG (International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases), www.tdwg.org ; Structure of Descriptive Data.: Subgroup Session Report at the TDWG Meeting in Frankfurt (2000) www.tdwg.org/tdwg2000/sddreport
Prometheus: www.prometheusdb.org
Allkin, R.: Handling Taxonomic Descriptions by Computer. In: Allkin, R., Bisby, F.A. (eds.) Databases in Systematics, Academic Press, London (1984)
The Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge: seek.ecoinformatics.org
Cui, Z., Jones, D.M., O’Brien, P.: Semantic B2B Integration: Issues in Ontology-based Applications. SIGMOD Record 31, 43–48 (2002)
Omelayenko, B.: Syntactic-Level Ontology Integration Rules for E-commerce. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International FLAIRS Conference (FLAIRS-2001), Key West, FL, pp. 324–328 (2001)
W3C: OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/
Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Formal Ontologies in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)
Sheth, A.: Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems: From System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics. In: Goodchild, M.F., Egenhofer, M.J., Fegeas, R., Kottman, C.A. (eds.) Interoperating Geographic Information Systems, pp. 5–30. Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)
Jaiswal, P., Ware, D., Ni, J., Chang, K., Zhao, W., Schmidt, S., Pan, X., Clark, K., Teytel-man, L., Cartinhour, S., Stein, L., McCouch, S.: Conference Review: Gramene: Development and Integration of Trait and Gene Ontologies for Rice. Comparative and Functional Genomics 3, 132–136 (2002)
The Plant Ontology Consortium: Conference Review: The Plant Ontology Consortium and Plant Ontologies. Comparative and Functional Genomics, vol. 3, pp. 137–142 (2002)
The Plant Ontology Consortium: www.plantontology.org
The Gene Ontology Consortium: www.geneontology.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paterson, T. et al. (2004). A Universal Character Model and Ontology of Defined Terms for Taxonomic Description. In: Rahm, E. (eds) Data Integration in the Life Sciences. DILS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24745-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24745-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21300-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24745-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive