Skip to main content

Intensional Sets in CLP

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2916))

Abstract

We propose a parametric introduction of intensionally defined sets into any \(CLP(\mathcal \{D\})\) language. The result is a language \(CLP({\mathcal \{D\}})\), where constraints over sets of elements of \(\mathcal D\) and over sets of sets of elements, and so on, can be expressed. The semantics of \(CLP({\mathcal \{D\}})\) is based on the semantics of logic programs with aggregates and the semantics of CLP over sets. We investigate the problem of constraint resolution in \(CLP({\mathcal \{D\}})\) and propose algorithms for constraints simplification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenas-Sánchez, P., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M.: A General Framework for Lazy Funct’l Logic Programming with Algebraic Polymorphic Types. TPLP 2(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beeri, C., Naqvi, S., Shmueli, O., Tsur, S.: Set Constructors in a Logic Database Language. Journal of Logic Programming 10(3), 181–232 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dal Palù, A., Dovier, A., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: Integrating Finite Domain Constraints and CLP with Sets. In: PPDP 2003, pp. 219–229. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Denecker, M., et al.: Ultimate well-founded and stable semantics for logic programs with aggregates. In: Codognet, P. (ed.) ICLP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2237, pp. 212–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dovier, A., Omodeo, E.G., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: {log}: A Logic Programming Language with Finite Sets. In: ICLP, pp. 111–124. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dovier, A., Piazza, C., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: Sets and Constraint Logic Programming. ACM TOPLAS 22(5), 861–931 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dovier, A., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: A Necessary Condition for Constructive Negation in Constraint Logic Programming. IPL 74(3-4), 146–156 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dovier, A., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: Constructive Negation and Constraint Logic Programming with Sets. New Generation Computing 19(3), 209–255 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M.: Representing Knowledge in A-Prolog. In: Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, pp. 413–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: JICSLP, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gervet, C.: Interval Propagation to Reason about Sets: Definition and Implementation of a Practical Language. Constraints 1, 191–246 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaffar, J., Maher, M.J.: Constraint Logic Programming: A Survey. Journal of Logic Programming, 19–20, 503–581 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jayaraman, B.: Implementation of Subset-Equational Programs. Journal of Logic Programming 12(4), 299–324 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemp, D.B., Stuckey, P.J.: Semantics of Logic Programs with Aggregates. In: ILPS, pp. 387–401. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuper, G.M.: Logic Programming with Sets. JCSS 41(1), 66–75 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Marek, V.W., Truszczyński, M.: Stable Models and an Alternative Logic Programming Paradigm. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm, Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niemela, I., Simons, P.: Extending Smodels with Cardinality and Weight Constraints. In: Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence, pp. 491–521. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ross, K.A., Sagiv, Y.: Monotonic Aggregation in Deductive Databases. Journal of Computer ans System Science 54, 79–97 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross, K.A., Srivastava, D., Stuckey, P.J., Sudarshan, S.: Foundations of aggregation constraints. Theoretical Computer Science 193(1-2), 149–179 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz, J.T., Dewar, R.B.K., Dubinsky, E., Schonberg, E.: Programming with Sets: an Introduction to SETL. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Gelder, A.: The Well-Founded Semantics of Aggregation. In: 11th Principles of Database Systems, pp. 127–138. ACM Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dovier, A., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G. (2003). Intensional Sets in CLP . In: Palamidessi, C. (eds) Logic Programming. ICLP 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2916. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24599-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24599-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20642-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24599-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics