Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland pp 305–321Cite as

Beginn eines goldenen Zeitalters der Terrorismusforschung oder macht der Letzte bitte das Licht aus?

  • Chapter

  • 3124 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl die Nachfrage nach Terrorismusforschung nicht nur weiterhin boomt, sondern ihr gar eine Zukunft als „stand-alone subject entering a golden age of research“ (Shepherd 2007; Attwood 2007) attestiert wird, sieht sich das Forschungsfeld mit einigen zentralen Herausforderungen konfrontiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Antonius, D., Brown, A., Walters, T., Ramirez, J. & Sinclair, S. (Hrsg.) (2010). Interdisciplinary Analyses of Terrorism and Political Aggression. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, R. (2007). Study of Terrorism Steps up to New Level. The Times. 22.06.2007, www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=209437&sectioncode=26. Zugegriffen: 12.12.2010.

  • Aust, S. (2008). Der Baader-Meinhof-Komplex.Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balz, H. (2008). Von Terroristen, Sympathisanten und dem starken Staat. Die öffentliche Debatte über die RAF in den 70er Jahren. Frankfurt a. M./ New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensahel, N. (2006). A Coalition of Coalitions: International Cooperation against Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorgo, T. (Hrsg.) (2005). Root Causes of Terrorism. Myths, Reality, and Ways Forward. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, R. (2007). Bringing the State back into Terrorism Studies. European Political Science, 6(3), 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen Smyth, M. (2007). A Critical Research Agenda for the Study of Political Terror. European Political Science, 6(3), 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen Smyth, M. (2009). Subjectivities, “Suspect Communities”, Governments and the Ethics of Research on “Terrorism”. In R. Jackson, M. Breen Smyth & J. Gunning (Hrsg.), Critical Terrorism Studies. A New Research Agenda(S. 194–215). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A., Dietz, K., Hirschl, B. & Walk, H. (2004). Interdisziplinarität in der Governance-Forschung, Diskussionspapier Nr. 14. Berlin: Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T. (2001). Is the New Terrorism Really New? An Analysis of the New Paradigm for Terrorism. Journal of Conflict Studies, XXI(2), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (1990). The Logic of Terrorism: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Strategic Choice. In W. Reich (Hrsg.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind,(S. 7–24). Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (1992). Current research on terrorism: an academic perspective. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 15(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A. K. (2006): How al-Qaida Ends. The Decline and Demise of Terrorist Groups. International Security, 31(1), 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A. K. (2009). How Terrorism Ends. Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czwarno, M. (2006). Misjudging Islamic Terrorism: The Academic Community's Failure to Predict 9/11. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(7), 657–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daase, C. (2001). Terrorismus – Begriffe, Theorien und Gegenstrategien. Friedens-Warte, 76(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyvesteyn, I. (2004). How New Is the New Terrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27(5), 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elter, A. (2006). Die RAF und die Medien. Ein Fallbeispiel für terroristische Kommunikation. In W. Kraushaar (Hrsg.), Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 2. (S. 1060–1074). Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). The “New Terrorism”: Revolution or Evolution. Political Studies Review, 7(2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A. (1991). The Discipline of Terrorology. In A. George (Hrsg.), Western State Terrorism(S. 76–101). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2010). Can terrorism become a scientific discipline? A diagnostic study. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3(3), 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (2006). Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture. Fort Belvoir VA: U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Advanced Systems and Concepts Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratna, R. (2003). Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror. New York: Berkley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, J. (2007). A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies. Government and Opposition, 43(3), 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gvineria, G. (2009). How Does Terrorism End? In P. K. Davis & K. Cragin (Hrsg.), Social Science for Counterterrorism. Putting the Pieces Together(S. 257–298). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2004). The Social Construction of Terrorism. In M. Fathali & A. J. Marsella (Hrsg.), Understanding Terrorism: Psychosocial Roots, Consequences, and Interventions(S. 91–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S. & O'Sullivan, G. (1989). The “Terrorism” Industry. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (1997). Issues in Terrorism Research. The Police Journal, 70(3), 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (2004). The Case for Firsthand Research. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism: Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 30–56). London: Frank Cass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. & Boyle, M. J. (2008). A Case Against “Critical Terrorism Studies”. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, R. & Spencer, A. (2008). The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies and the Constructivist Turn. Security Dialogue,39(6), 571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institut für Zeitgeschichte (2010). Demokratischer Staat und terroristische Herausforderung. Die Anti-Terrorismus-Politik der 1970er und 1980er Jahre in Westeuropa, IfZ-Forschungsprojekt. www.ifz-muenchen.de/anti-terror-politik.html. Zugegriffen: 12.12.2010.

  • Jackson, R. (2007). The Core Commitments of Critical Terrorism Studies. European Political Science, 6(3), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., Smyth, M. & Gunning, J. (Hrsg.) (2009). Critical terrorism studies: a new research agenda. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2007). Terrorism studies: theoretically under-developed? e-International Relations. www.e-ir.info/?p=151. Zugegriffen: 15.02.2011.

  • Jones, S. & Libicki, M. (2008). How Terrorist Groups End. Lessons for Countering al Qa'ida, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungert, M., Romfeld, E. & Voigt, U. (Hrsg.) (2010). Interdisziplinarität: Theorie, Praxis, Probleme.Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knelangen, W. (2008). Terrorismus – Im Zentrum der politischen Debatte, immer noch an den Rändern der Forschung? In H. Lange, H. Ohly & J. Reichertz (Hrsg), Auf der Suche nach neuer Sicherheit(S. 75–88). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, W. (Hrsg) (2006a). Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus.Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, W. (2006b). Einleitung. Zur Topologie des RAF-Terrorismus. In W. Kraushaar (Hrsg), Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 1 (S. 13–61). Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1977). Terrorism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (1999). The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, I. (1999). Introduction. In I. Lesser, B. Hoffman, J. Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt, M. Zanini & B. Jenkins (Hrsg.), Countering the New Terrorism(S. 1–5). Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lia, B. & Skjolberg, K. (2004). Warum es zu Terrorismus kommt. Ein Überblick über Theorien und Hypothesen zu den Ursachen des Terrorismus. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, 6(1), 121–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, O. (2001). Enough of the Definition of Terrorism!London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merari, A. (1991). Academic Research and Government Policy on Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 3(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlstein, R. M. (1991). The Mind of the Political Terrorist. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. (2007). Tödlicher Irrtum. Die Geschichte der RAF. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, M. (Hrsg.) (2007a). Mapping terrorism research: state of the art, gaps and future direction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, M. (2007b). Introduction: mapping terrorism research – challenges and priorities. In M. Ranstorp (Hrsg.), Mapping terrorism research: state of the art, gaps and future direction(S. 1–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, F. (2004). Breaking the Cycle: Empirical Research and Postgraduate Studies on Terrorism. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism: Trends Achievements and Failures(S. 161–185). London: Frank Cass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J. (2007), The Rise and Rise of Terrorism Studies. The Guardian03.07.2007, www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/jul/03/highereducation.research. Zugegriffen: 12. 12.2010.

  • Silke, A. (2001). The Devil You Know. Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism. Terrorism and PoliticalViolence, 13(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2004a). The Road Less Travelled: Recent Trends in Terrorism Research. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures(S. 186–213). London: Frank Cass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (Hrsg.) (2004b). Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2004c): An Introduction to Terrorism Research. In A. Silke (Hrsg.), Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures(S. 1–29). London: Frank Cass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S. & Benjamin, D. (2000). America and the New Terrorism. Survival, 42(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluka, J. (2009). The Contribution of Anthropology to Critical Terrorism Studies. In R. Jackson, M. Breen Smyth & J. Gunning (Hrsg.), Critical Terrorism Studies. A New Research Agenda(S. 138–15). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2006). Questioning the Concept of ‘New Terrorism’. Peace, Conflict and Development, 8, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2010). The Tabloid Terrorist: The Predicative Construction of ‘New Terrorism’ in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. & Biazza J. (2008). Deutsche Terrorismusforschung: Interdisziplinarität in der Terrorismusforschung. WeltTrends, 63, 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßner, A. (2003). Die dritte Generation der „Roten Armee Fraktion“: Entstehung, Struktur, Funktionslogik und Zerfall einer terroristischen Organisation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßner, A. (2004). Terrorismus und Generalisierung. Gibt es einen Lebenslauf terroristischer Gruppierungen? Zeitschrift für Politik, 51(4), 359–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuberger, U. (2008). Die Akte RAF. Taten und Motive. Täter und Opfer. München: Herbig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toros, H. (2008). Terrorists, Scholars and Ordinary People: Confronting Terrorism Studies with Field Experience. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(2), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. (2001). What's New About the New Terrorism and How Dangerous Is It? Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, A. (2004). Sociology of Terrorism. Annual Review of Sociology, 30,271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, L. & Eubank, W. (2008). Problems with the Critical Studies Approach to the Study of Terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(2), 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhauer, K., Requate, J. & Haupt, H. (Hrsg.) (2006). Terrorismus in der Bundesrepublik. Medien, Staat und Subkulturen in den 1970er Jahren. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhauer, K. & Requate, J. (2006). Einleitung. Die Herausforderung des „Linksterrorismus“. In K. Weinhauer, J. Requate & H. Haupt (Hrsg.), Terrorismus in der Bundesrepublik. Medien, Staat und Subkulturen in den 1970er Jahren(S. 9–32). Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2000). Issues in the Study of Political Violence: Understanding the Motives of Participants in Small Group Political Violence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 12(1), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, W. (2008). Die Geschichte der RAF. Reinbek: Rororo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulaika, J. & Douglass, W. A. (1996). Terror and Taboo. The Follies, Fables and Faces of Terrorism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulaika, J. & Douglass, W. A. (2008). The Terrorist Subject: Terrorism Studies and the Absent Subjectivity'. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kai Harbrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Kocks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Alexander Spencer Alexander Kocks Kai Harbrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften ist eine Marke von Springer Fachmedien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harbrich, K., Kocks, A., Spencer, A. (2011). Beginn eines goldenen Zeitalters der Terrorismusforschung oder macht der Letzte bitte das Licht aus?. In: Spencer, A., Kocks, A., Harbrich, K. (eds) Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93040-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93040-4_13

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17729-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93040-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation