Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Politische Gewalt pp 205–230Cite as

Revolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Die Erforschung von Revolutionen hat in den letzten 50 Jahren einen enormen Wandel erlebt. Was einst ein gut strukturiertes Forschungsfeld war, hat sich in eine unübersichtliche Vielfalt von Fallstudien, Methoden und Theorien gewandelt. Bis in die 1970er Jahre hatte sich die Revolutionsforschung auf die Analyse der großen Revolutionen in Frankreich 1789, Russland 1917 und China 1949 konzentriert, die bei allen Unterschieden im Detail deutliche Gemeinsamkeiten aufwiesen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ahady, Anwar-ul-Haq. 1991. Afghanistan: State Breakdown. In Revolutions of the Late Twentieth Century, hg. von Jack A. Goldstone, Ted R. Gurr, und Farrokh Moshiri, 162 – 193. Boulder, Co. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes, Uwe. 2000. Liberalismus und Demokratie – Antinomie und Synthese: Zum Wechselverhältnis zweier politischer Strömungen im Vormärz. Düsseldorf: Droste. Univ., Habil.- Schr. – Bayreuth, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, Franz. 1937. State and Revolution in the Paris Commune, the Russian Revolution and the Spanish Civil War. Sociological Review 29 (1): 41–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948. Hundert Jahre Marxismus. Merkur 2: 321 – 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, Ellen. 1996. Die Rolle von Eliten und kollektiven Akteuren in Transitionsprozessen. In Systemwechsel 1: Theorien, Ansätze und Konzepte der Transitionsforschung, hg. von Wolfgang Merkel, 81 – 109. Opladen: Leske +Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, Crane. 1965. The Anatomy of Revolution (1938). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno Mesquita, Bruce de, Randolph M. Siverson, und Gary Woller. 1992. War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review 86 (3): 638 – 646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burckhardt, Jacob. 1963. Weltgeschichtliche Betrachtungen. Stuttgart: Kroner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund. 1967. Betrachtungen über die Französische Revolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, Jeff. 2012. Measuring Revolution. Conflict Management and Peace Science 29 (4): 444–467. doi: 10.1177/0738894212449093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, James C. 1969. The J-Curve of Rising and Declining Satisfaction as a Course of Some Great Revolutions and a Contained Rebellion. In Violence in America: Historical and comparative perspectives, hg. von Hugh D. Graham und Ted R. Gurr, 690 – 731. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, Robert H. 1983. The Varieties of Revolution. Comparative Politics 15: 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Why Revolutions Succeed & Fail. Polity 16 (3): 423 – 446.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Eastern Europe’s Implications for Revolutionary Theory. Polity 24 (2): 227 – 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1999. Fundamentalism, sectarianism, and revolution: The Jacobin dimension of modernity. Cambridge, U. K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetscher, Iring. 1985. Evolution, Revolution, Reform. In Politikwissenschaft: Begriffe, Analysen, Theorien : ein Grundkurs, hg. von Iring Fetscher und Herfried Münkler, 399 – 431. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A., Hg. 1986. Revolutions: Theoretical, comparative, and historical studies. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Toward A Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 139 – 187. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2011. Understanding the Revolutions of 2011. Weakness and Resilience in Middle Eastern Autocracies. Foreign Affairs 30 (3). http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67694/jack-agoldstone/ understanding-the-revolutions-of-2011. Zugegriffen: 13. Oktober 2012.

  • Goodwin, Jeff. 1994. Toward a new sociology of revolutions. Theory and Society 23: 731–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Jeff, und Theda Skocpol. 1989. Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World. Politics & Society 17 (4): 489–509. doi: 10.1177/003232928901700403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Jerrold D. 1984. Countermobilization as a Revolutionary Form. Comparative Politics 16 (2): 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griewank, Karl. 1973. Der neuzeitliche Revolutionsbegriff: Entstehung u. Geschichte. 1. Aufl. Frankfurt (am Main): Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted R. 1970. Why men rebel. Princeton, N. J. Published for the Center of International Studies, Princeton University [by] Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, Mark N. 1974. The Phenomenon of Revolution. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1944. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Einleitung: System und Geschichte der Philosophie. Leipzig: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honecker, Martin. 1995. Grundriß der Sozialethik. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, R. D. 1974. Der revolutionäre Prozeß. In Revolution und Theorie 1: Materialien zum bürgerlichen Revolutionsverständnis, hg. von Urs Jaeggi und Sven Papcke, 149 – 168. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven, Conn: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers A. 1966. Revolutionstheorie. Köln [u. a.]: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. Revolutionstheorie. Studienbibliothek. Köln [u. a.]: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. Revolutionary change. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Mark N. 1997. Revolutions and revolutionary waves. 1. Aufl. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddi, Nikki R. 1981. Roots of revolution. An interpretive history of modern Iran. New Haven: Yale U. P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Richard. 1997. Agents of Revolution: Elite conflicts and mass mobilization from the Medici to Yeltsin. In Theorizing revolutions, hg. von John Foran. 1. Aufl., 73 – 101. London u.a: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1968. Revolution. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, hg. von David L. Sills, 501 – 507. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, Clausjohann. 1972. Theorie der Revolution: Ein Beitrag zur verhaltenstheoretischen Soziologie. München: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Tim. 1994. Response to Goodwin. Theory and Society 23 (6): 789–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, Karl-Dieter, Peter Voss, und Christiane Gern. 1995. Origins of a spontaneous revolution: East Germany, 1989. Economics, cognition, and society. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Robert A. 2001. Preempting Revolutions: The Boundaries of U. S. Influence. In Revolution: International dimensions, hg. von Mark N. Katz, 169 – 197. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, Steven. 1996. Collective Identity and Informal Groups in Revolutionary Mobilization: East Germany in 1989. Social Forces 75 (1): 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 1992. The Games of Transition. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The new South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, hg. von Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell, und J. S. Valenzuela, 105 – 152. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, Annemarie. 2011. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin: „Tunesien hat die größten Chancen“. Badische Zeitung, 26. 02. 2011. http://www.badische-zeitung.de/ausland-1/tunesien-hatdie- groessten-chancen–41810260.html. Zugegriffen: 26. 09. 2012.

  • Russell, D. E. H. 1974. Rebellion, revolution, and armed force: A comparative study of fifteen countries with special emphasis on Cuba and South Africa. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlözer, August L. von. 1793. Allgemeines StatsRecht und StatsVerfassungsLere. StatsGelartheit nach ihren Haupttheilen, im Auszug und Zusammenhang 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale Univ. Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Richard. 1998. Paths out of Sultanistic Regimes: Combining Structural and Voluntarist Perspectives. In Sultanistic regimes, hg. von Houchang E. Chehabi und Juan J. Linz, 49 – 81. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, Bassam. 1981. Die iranische Revolution und die Re-Islamisierung im Lichte des Nord-Süd- Konfliktes. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte : APuZ (14): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1973. Does Modernization Breed Revolution ? Comparative Politics 5 (3): 425 – 447. —. 1986. The contentious French. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. S. 1992. Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The new South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, hg. von Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell, und J. S. Valenzuela, 57 – 104. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M. 1992. Revolution and War. World Politics 44 (3): 321–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmund, Hans. 1978. Revolutionstheorien. 1. Aufl. Beck’sche Schwarze Reihe 176. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weede, Erich, und Edward N. Muller. 1998. Rebellion, Violence and Revolution: A Rational Choice Perspective. Journal of Peace Research 35 (1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, Eberhard. 1978. Der Durchbruch des Burgertums, 1776 – 1847: Propylaen-Geschichte Europas. Frankfurt am Main [u. a.]: Propylaen Verl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P. 1992. Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: A comparative study of insurgents and regimes since 1956. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Dieter, und Michael Zürn. 1995. Revolutionstheorien. In Lexikon der Politik, hg. von Dieter Nohlen, 552 – 561. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Dingxin. 2001. The power of Tiananmen: State-society relations and the 1989 Beijing student movement. Chicago Ill. u.a: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Ekkart. 1990. On the Outcomes of Revolutions: Some Preliminary Considerations. Sociogical Theory 8 (1): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Deutschland

    Birgit Enzmann

Authors
  1. Birgit Enzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. f. Politikwissenschaft, Kath. Univ. Eichstätt, Universitätsallee 1, Eichstätt, 85072, Germany

    Birgit Enzmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enzmann, B. (2013). Revolution. In: Enzmann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politische Gewalt. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18958-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18958-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18081-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18958-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation