Skip to main content

Risk Modelling of Blockchain Ecosystem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10394))

Abstract

If a blockchain is well-implemented, the resulting advantages include speed, privacy, reliability, and much lower costs. As more global enterprises adopt blockchain technology, it is necessary to evaluate and address not only benefits but the associated risks too. Effective solutions can be proposed based on the analysis of potential risks in the used blockchain ecosystem by its modelling.

In the paper, the approach for risk modelling of blockchain ecosystem is described. Practical realization of simulation on the base of Petri Net model is proposed. Process of E-net model design for analysis of blockchain platform and critical aspects of a blockchain solution includes the next main components: formal construction of the individual blocks process formation in the blockchain; formal construction for transformation probability of various possible risks in the blockchain ecosystem into the generator of risk events; formal metamodeling of blockchain operation with critical aspects of a blockchain solution; base set of modelling elements for above-mentioned transformation procedure; and software tools for simulation experiment. The detailed rules for design of Petri Net model are proposed and used structure of ATM communication network is performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seibold, S., Samman, G.: Consensus. Immutable agreement for the Internet of value. KPMG (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, R., Stenum Czepluch, J., Lollike, N., Malone, S.: Blockchain – the gateway to trust-free cryptographic transactions. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Teigland, R., Yetis, Z., Larsson, T.O.: Breaking out of the bank in Europe-exploring collective emergent institutional entrepreneurship through bitcoin, SSRN 2263707 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ingram, C., Morisse, M.: Almost an MNC: Bitcoin entrepreneurs’ use of collective resources and decoupling to build legitimacy, pp. 4083–4092. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollen, R.: The legal status of online currencies: are bitcoins the future? J. Bank. Finance Law Pract. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tsiakis, T., Sthephanides, G.: The concept of security and trust in electronic payments. Comput. Secur. 24(1), 10–15 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw, N.: The mediating influence of trust in the adoption of the mobile wallet. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 21(4), 449–459 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, H., Yang, Z.: Examining mobile payment user adoption from the perspective of trust. Int. J. u-and e-Service Sci. Technol. 8(1), 117–130 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ondrus, J., Pigneur, Y.: Near field communication: an assessment for future payment systems. IseB 7(3), 347–361 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Au, Y.A., Kauffman, R.J.: The economics of mobile payments: Understanding stakeholder issues for an emerging financial technology application. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7(2), 141–164 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser, F., Bezzenberger, L.: Beyond cryptocurrencies-a taxonomy of decentralized consensus systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Condos, J., Sorrell, W.H., Donegan, S.L.: Blockchain technology: opportunities and risks, 15 January 2016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horkovich, R.M., Palley, S.: Understanding the Benefits and Risks of Blockchain, 6 March 2017. http://www.rmmagazine.com/2017/03/06/understanding-the-benefits-and-risks-of-blockchain/

  14. The risks and opportunities of blockchain, 27 March 2017. http://www.strategic-risk-global.com/the-risks-and-opportunities-of-blockchain/1421287.article

  15. Kasey, P.: Blockchain Combines Innovation with Risk. Security professionals must consider the risks of blockchain as they innovate, 11 October 2016. http://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/blockchain-combines-innovation-with-risk/

  16. Sprecher, C., Gallersdörfer, U.: Challenges and risks of blockchain technology, 24 February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindman, J., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, K.: Opportunities and risks of blockchain technologies in payments– a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1533–1542 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rizun, P.: Subchains Facilitate On-chain Scaling and Fast Transaction Verification. Scaling bitcoin working paper, August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tessone, C.J.: Stochastic Modelling of Blockchain Systems. University of Zurih, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Radhakrishnan, S.: Modeling the Blockchain for Business Use. Bitcoin Magazine, 22 January 2016. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/modeling-the-blockchain-for-business-use-1453487323/

  21. Byström, H.: Blockchains, Real-Time Accounting and the Future of Credit Risk Modeling. Lund University, Department of Economics School of Economics and Management, Working Paper 2016:4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Operationalizing blockchain. Solution Series: Securities. SOFTWARE AG, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 31 October 2008. http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/#selection-19.6-19.22

  24. Blockchain Technology in the Insurance Sector. Quarterly meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance (FACI). McKinsey & Company, 5 January 2017

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delayed Proof of Work (dPoW) Whitepaper. v.1.0, J1777, 30 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  26. Missing link. Navigating the disruption risks of blockchain. KPMG (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nutt, G.: Evaluation nets for computer systems performance analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, vol. 41, Part 1, pp. 279–286. AFIPS Press, Montvale, December 1972

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petri Nets Tools Database. https://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/TGI/PetriNets/tools/quick.html

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the project “Smart Logistics and Freight Villages Initiative (SmartLog)” of INTERREG Central Baltic research programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Kabashkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kabashkin, I. (2017). Risk Modelling of Blockchain Ecosystem. In: Yan, Z., Molva, R., Mazurczyk, W., Kantola, R. (eds) Network and System Security. NSS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10394. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64701-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64701-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64700-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64701-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics