Abstract
E-petitioning is a ubiquitous form of online political action that has emerged as a contemporary and potentially effective way for citizens to communicate with their governments about policy issues and that makes public participation in policy discussions more easily accessible. We argue that e-petitioning platforms generate novel types of data and that governments can benefit from the information acquired through various types of analyses. We begin by presenting e-petitioning as a new form of political participation in the context of several different types of national democracies. We suggest that e-petitioning has provided political activists with a new mechanism for collective action. From there we consider four popular national e-petitioning platforms in the countries of Scotland, Great Britain, Germany, and the USA. We discuss the design features and submission processes of the different platforms and how they generate different streams of data that governments can use to better understand e-petitioning behavior. We then suggest and illustrate different analytic tools that can be used to explore the characteristics and dynamics of e-petitioning. We conclude by suggesting that government should actively seek ways to interpret and understand this new form of participation and policy discourse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Prior to the April, 2016 changes, users were able to search by keyword or subject categories. The search feature is no longer available and now users have to read through page after page of current petitions to sign.
- 10.
Individual, Community Groups, Interest Groups, Charities, Local Authority, Trade Union, Other, and Offline Petitioner.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
Instructions on how to do this are given to the petition creator after they have created their petition.
- 14.
The original threshold to receive a response was 5000 raised to 25,000 in October, 2011 and raised again to 100,000 in January, 2013.
- 15.
References
Anduiza, P. E., Jensen, D. M. J., and Jorba, D. L. Eds., 2012. Digital media and political engagement worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, W. L. 2008. Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bennett, W.L. and Segerberg, A., 2012. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739–768.
Bimber, B., Cunill, M.C., Copeland, L. and Gibson, R., 2015. Digital media and political participation the moderating role of political interest across acts and over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), pp. 21–42.
Bimber, B., Stohl, C., and Flanagin, A. J. 2008. Technological change and the shifting nature of political organization. In A. Chadwick and P.N. Howard (Eds.), Routlegde Handbook of Internet Politics, pp.72–85. New York: Routledge.
Bochel, C. 2012. Petitions systems: contributing to representative democracy? Parliamentary Affairs, 1–18.
Crozier, M., Huntington, S.P. and Watanuki, J., 1975. The crisis of democracy (Vol. 70). New York: New York University Press.
Dalton, R.J., 2013. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Cq Press.
Dumas, C., LaManna, D. Harrison, T.M., Ravi, S.S., Kotfila, C., Gervais, N., Hagen, L., and Chen, F., 2014. Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We The People (extended abstract). Presented at the Social Media & Society Conference, July 27–29, 2014, Toronto, Canada.
Dumas, C., LaManna, D., Harrison, T. M., Ravi, S. S., Hagen, L., Kotfila, C., and Chen, F., 2015a. E-petitioning as collective political action in We the People. iConference 2015 Proceedings.
Dumas, C.L., LaManna, D., Harrison, T.M., Ravi, S.S., Kotfila, C., Gervais, N., Hagen, L. and Chen, F., 2015b. Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We the People. Big Data & Society, 2(2), p. 2053951715598170.
Earl, J., and Kimport, K., 2013. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age (Reprint edition). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Earl, J., and Schussman, A., 2008. Contesting cultural control: youth culture and online petitioning. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 71–95). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Escher, T., and Riehm, U., 2016. Petitioning the German Bundestag: political equality and the role of the internet. Parliamentary Affairs, gsw009.
Fountain, J., 2005. Central issues in the political development of the virtual state. In M. Castells and G. Cardoso, eds., The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy, pp. 149–181. Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC.
Fox, R., 2009. Engagement and participation: What the public want and how our politicians need to respond. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(4), pp. 673–685. http://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp027
Gilens, M., and Page, B. I., 2014. Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(03), pp. 564–581. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Gleeson, J.P., Cellai, D., Onnela, J.P., Porter, M.A. and Reed-Tsochas, F., 2014. A simple generative model of collective online behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(29), pp. 10411–10415.
Goldman, J., 2015. How we’re changing the way we respond to petitions. Available at: https://medium.com/@Goldman44/how-we-re-changing-the-way-we-respond-to-petitions-74ed0ffd1d77#.x8jafxx6f. [Accessed 5 Aug., 2016]
Goldman, J., 2016. Redesigning We the People: Improving the way you engage with the White House. Available at: https://medium.com/@Goldman44/redesigning-we-the-people-c8ce93f4280#.t6bdhpy09 [Accessed 5 Aug., 2016]
Hagen, L., Harrison, T.M., Uzuner, Ö., Fake, T., Lamanna, D. and Kotfila, C., 2015a, Introducing textual analysis tools for policy informatics: a case study of e-petitions. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 10–19). ACM.
Hagen, L., Uzuner, Ö., Kotfila, C., Harrison, T.M. and Lamanna, D., 2015b, January. Understanding Citizens’ Direct Policy Suggestions to the Federal Government: A Natural Language Processing and Topic Modeling Approach. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on(pp. 2134–2143). IEEE.
Hale, S.A., Margetts, H. and Yasseri, T., 2013, May. Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street website. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM web science conference (pp. 132–138). ACM.
Harrison, T.M. Dumas, C, Kotfila, C., LaManna, D., and Ravi, S.S., 2014. We the People: U.S. E-Petitioning as Technology-Mediated Social Action. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA) Seattle, WA.
Harrison, T.M. and Falvey, L., 2001. Democracy and new communication technologies. Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), pp. 1–43
Held, D., 1996. Models of democracy (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Perl, A., 2009. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (3rd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jungherr, A. and Jürgens, P., 2010. The Political Click: Political Participation through E‐Petitions in Germany. Policy & Internet, 2(4), pp. 131–165.
Kelly, R., and Priddy, S., 2015. e-Petitions: Briefing Paper 20 October. House of Commons. Available at: http://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/library/stay_informed_parliamentary_news/e-petitions.pdf. [Accessed 4 Aug., 2016]
Lin, Y.R., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., Baronchelli, A. and Lazer, D., 2013.# Bigbirds never die: understanding social dynamics of emergent hashtag. arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.7144.
Lindner, R. and Riehm, U., 2009. Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 1(1), pp. 1–11.
Lindner, R. and Riehm, U., 2011. Broadening Participation Through E‐Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament. Policy & Internet, 3(1), pp. 1–23.
Macintosh, A., Adams, N., Whyte, A. and Johnston, J., 2008. ePetitioning in the Scottish Parliament. In Digital Government (pp. 487–501). Springer US.
Mechaber, E., 2014. Here’s How Cell Phone Unlocking Became Legal. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/08/15/heres-how-cell-phone-unlocking-became-legal. [Accessed 2 Dec. 2016].
Muhlberger, P., Stromer-Galley, J. and Webb, N., 2011. Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora: Insights from the deliberative e-rulemaking project. Information Polity, 16(3), pp. 197–214.
Newton, A., 2002. Petition overview. Available at: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/petition-overview. [Accessed 30 Aug. 2016].
Obama, B., 2009. Transparency and Open Government: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/. [Accessed 10 Dec. 2016].
Public Petitions Committee, 2015. Review of the Petitions Process, 2nd Report. Available at: http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/94915.aspx [Accessed 3 Aug. 2016].
Public Petitions Committee, 2016. Legacy Paper, 2nd Report. Available at: http://www.parliament.scot/S4_PublicPetitionsCommittee/Reports/PPCS042016R02.pdf [Accessed 3 Aug. 2016].
Riehm, U., Böhle, K. and Lindner, R., 2012. Electronic petitioning and modernisation of petitioning systems in Europe. English summary, at http://www.tab-beim-bundestag.de/en/pdf/publications/reports/AB146_Summary.pdf , accessed, 27.
Schmidt, J.H. and Johnsen, K., 2014. On the use of the e-petition platform of the German Bundestag.
Smith, S.R. and Ingram, H.M., 1993. Public policy for democracy. Brookings Institution.
Street, J., 1997. Remote Control? Politics, Technology and Electronic Democracy’. European Journal of Communication, 12(1), pp. 27–42.
Stoker, G., 2006. Why politics matters: making democracy work. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tufekci, Z. and Wilson, C., 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), pp. 363–379.
Van Dijk, J., 2012. The network society. Sage Publications.
Wright, S., 2012. Assessing (e-) democratic innovations: “Democratic goods” and Downing Street e-petitions. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), pp. 453–470.
We The People., 2015. Available at: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/.
Yasseri, T., Hale, S.A. and Margetts, H., 2013. Modeling the rise in internet-based petitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0239.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumas, C., Harrison, T.M., Hagen, L., Zhao, X. (2017). What Do the People Think?: E-Petitioning and Policy Decision Making. In: Paulin, A., Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. (eds) Beyond Bureaucracy. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54141-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54142-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)