Abstract
Direct and indirect optimal control methods are used. Two different objective functions are considered. First, the transferred heat flux is maximized and the resulting optimal pin fin shape is a cylinder. Second, the pin volume is minimized for given value of the heat flux. Then, the optimum pin fin profile consists of two regions. In the first region, close to the basis, the pin thickness decreases linearly. In the second region the pin thickness is constant or may decrease, depending on thermal loads and operation. The optimal control solution is usually singular but may be very well approximated by a bang-bang solution. The technology and design constraints have important effects on pin fin profile.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azarkish, H., Sarvari, S.M.H., Behzadmehr, A.: Optimum geometry design of a longitudinal fin with volumetric heat generation under the influences of natural convection and radiation. Energy Convers. Manag. 51, 1938–1946 (2010)
Badescu, V.: Optimal profile of heat transfer pin fins under technological constraints. Energy 93, Part 2, 2292–2298 (2015)
Betts, J.T.: Practical Methods For Optimal Control Using Nonlinear Programming Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia (2001)
Bonnans, F., Giorgi, D., Grelard, V., Maindrault, S., Martinon, P., (2014). BOCOP—The Optimal Control Solver, User Guide. 8 Apr 2014 http://bocop.org
Chung, B.T.F., Talbot, D.J., Van Dyke, J.M.: A new look at the optimum dimensions of convective splines. AIChE Heat Transfer 84, 108–113 (1988)
Das, S., Razelos, P.: Optimization of convective trapezoidal profile circular pin fins. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 24, 533–541 (1997)
Georgiou, E.N.: Analysis and optimization of convective pin fins with trapezoidal profile having internal heat generation density. J. Franklin Inst. 335B, 179–197 (1998)
Hajabdollahi, F., Rafsanjani, H.H., Hajabdollahi, Z., Hamidi, Y.: Multi-objective optimization of pin fin to determine the optimal fin geometry using genetic algorithm. Appl. Math. Model. 36, 244–254 (2012)
Hanin, L.: A new optimum pin fin beyond the “length-of-arc” assumption. Heat Transfer Eng. 29, 608–614 (2008)
Hanin, L., Campo, A.: A new minimum volume straight cooling fin taking into account the “length of arc”. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46, 5145–5152 (2003)
Hollands, K.G.T., Stedman, B.A.: Optimization of an absorber plate fin having a step-change in local thickness. Sol. Energy 49, 493–495 (1992)
Kobus, C.J., Cavanaugh, R.B.: A theoretical investigation into the optimal longitudinal profile of a horizontal pin fin of least material under the influence of pure forced and pure natural convection with a diameter-variable convective heat transfer coefficient. J. Heat Transfer 128, 843–846 (2006)
Kovarik, M.: Optimal solar energy collector systems. Sol. Energy 17, 91–94 (1975)
Kundu, B.: Performance and optimization analysis of SRC profile fins subject to simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50, 1545–1558 (2007)
Kundu, B., Lee, K.-S.: Shape optimization for the minimum volume of pin fins in simultaneous heat and mass transfer environments. Heat Mass Transfer 48, 1333–1343 (2012a)
Kundu, B., Lee, K.-S.: A novel analysis for calculating the smallest envelope shape of wet fins with a nonlinear mode of surface transport. Energy 44, 527–543 (2012b)
Kundu, B., Lee, K.-S.: Analytic solution for heat transfer of wet fins on account of all nonlinearity effects. Energy 41, 354–367 (2012c)
Kundu, B., Lee, K.-S.: The effect of arc length on the least-volume fin under sensible and latent heat loads. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 63, 414–424 (2013)
Lawson, S.A., Thrift, A.A., Thole, K.A., Kohli, A.: Heat transfer from multiple row arrays of low aspect ratio pin fins. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 54, 4099–4109 (2011)
Li, C.H.: Optimum cylindrical pin fin. AIChE J. 29, 1043–1044 (1983)
Maday, C.J.: The minimum weight one-dimensional straight fin. ASME J. Engng. Ind. 96, 161 (1974)
Natarajan, U., Shenoy, U.V.: Optimum shapes of convective pin fins with variable heat transfer coefficient. J. Franklin Inst. 327, 965–982 (1990)
Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical optimization. Springer, New York (1999)
Nwosu, N.P.: Employing exergy-optimized pin fins in the design of an absorber in a solar air heater. Energy 35, 571–575 (2010)
H.J. Oberle, W. Grimm, 2001. BNDSCO, A program for the Numerical Solution of Optimal Control Problems, Report No. 515 der DFVLR, [Deutsche Forschungs-und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft-und Raumfahrt e.V. 1989, Reihe B, Bericht 36], Oct 2001, (http://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/oberle/software.html)
Panda, S., Bhowmik, A., Das, R., Repaka, R., Martha, S.C.: Application of homotopy analysis method and inverse solution of a rectangular wet fin. Energy Convers. Manag. 80, 305–318 (2014)
Piskunov, N.: Differential and integral calculus. MIR Publishers, Moscow (1969)
Pontryagin, L.S., Boltyanskii, V.G., Gamkrelidze, R.V., Mishchenko, E.F.: Mathematical theory of optimal processes. Wiley, New York (1962)
Razelos, P., Georgiou, E.: Two-dimensional effects and design criteria for convective extended surfaces. Heat Transfer Eng. 13, 38–48 (1992)
Razelos, P., Imre, K.: Minimum mass convective fins with variable heat transfer coefficients. J. Franklin Inst. 315, 269 (1983)
Rong-Hua, Y.: Errors in one-dimensional fin optimization problem for convective heat transfer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 39, 3075–3078 ( 1996)
Rong-Hua, Y.: An analytical study of the optimum dimensions of rectangular fins and cylindrical pin fins. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 40, 3607–3615 (1997)
Schmidt, E.: Die Wlrmeubertragung durch Rippen. Z. Verein. Deutsch Ing. 70, 885 (1926)
Sertkaya, A.A., Bilir, S., Kargıcı, S.: Experimental investigation of the effects of orientation angle on heat transfer performance of pin-finned surfaces in natural convection. Energy 36, 1513–1517 (2011)
Shuja, S.Z.: Optimal fin geometry based on exergoeconomic analysis for a pin-fin array with application to electronics cooling. Exergy 2, 248–258 (2002)
Sonn, A., Bar-Cohen, A.: Optimum cylindrical pin fin, ASME. J. Heat Transfer 103, 814–815 (1981)
Tiris, C., Tiris, M., Ture, I.E.: Effects of fin design on collector efficiency. Energy 20, 1021–1026 (1995)
Tolle, H.: Optimization methods. Springer, New York (1975)
Torabi, M., Aziz, A., Zhang, K.: A comparative study of longitudinal fins of rectangular, trapezoidal and concave parabolic profiles with multiple nonlinearities. Energy 51, 243–256 (2013)
Wachter, A., Biegler, L.T.: On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program 106, 25–57 (2006)
Walther, A., Griewank, A.: Getting started with ADOL-C. In: Naumann, U., Schenk, O. (eds.) Combinatorial Scientific Computing, Chapman-Hall CRC, Computational Science (2012)
Yovanovich, M.M.: On the effect of shape, aspect ratio and orientation upon natural convection from isothermal bodies of complex shape. ASME HTD 82, 121–129 (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 13A
Appendix 13A
The objective is to optimize the pin shape for the maximization of the heat flux Q. For simplicity Eq. (13.1.5) with \( k = 1 \) is adopted. The following notation is used:
Usage of Eqs. (13.1.2)–(13.1.5) and (13.A.1a, b) gives the dependence of the cross section area and perimeter, respectively, on \( z \):
From Eq. (13.A.2a, b) one finds:
The procedure adopted here is based on Pontryagin’s principle. The same procedure has been used by Maday (1974), Razelos and Imre (1983) and Natarajan and Shenoy (1990). The quoted authors used two state functions and the control was the pin diameter. Thus, the Hamiltonian was non-linear in the control and the solution did not contain singular arcs (Natarajan and Shenoy 1990). Here the heat flux Q given by Eq. (13.1.8) is maximized by using Eq. (13.1.7) as a constraint. The derivative:
is the control while a new variable, \( \tilde{Q} \), is introduced in order to transform the Bolza optimal control problem into a standard Mayer problem. Then, the following equations system is to be solved:
Equation (13.A.5a, b) comes from Eq. (13.A.7) by using Eqs. (13.A.3) and (13.A.4) while Eq. (13A.5c) comes from Eqs. (13.1.8) and 13.A.3). The objective is to maximize \( \tilde{Q}(z = L) \).
The ordinary differential Eq. (13.A.5a–c) can be solved by using appropriate boundary conditions. However, there is no need to do this here. The Hamiltonian \( H \) of the system is built as described by Tolle (1975) and Chap. 5 of this book:
where \( f_{T} ,f_{{\tilde{T}}} ,f_{{\tilde{Q}}} \) are adjoint functions. The Hamiltonian is linear in the control \( \tilde{A} \). Therefore, the solution is non-regular and the control is not uniquely determined for all values of state and adjoint functions [Oberle and Grimm (2001, p. 22)]. In some common cases depending on constraints, the non-regular solution is of bang-bang type, i.e. the control jumps from the minimum to the maximum allowed value. The maximum value of \( \tilde{A} \) is zero and this means that \( A(z) \) is a constant (= \( A_{0} \)). From Eq. 13.A.3) one sees that \( P(z) \) is also constant. Thus, the optimal pin shape which maximizes the heat flux transferred to the fluid is a cylinder whose basis is delimitated by the contour curve C.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Badescu, V. (2017). Optimization of Pin Fin Profiles. In: Optimal Control in Thermal Engineering. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 93. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52968-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52968-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52967-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52968-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)