Abstract
A fundamental tenet of Western biomedicine is the validation of a patient’s predicament by the clinician through demonstration of a disease process underlying illness. For the person experiencing chronic pain, however, the absence of demonstrable pathophysiological evidence of disease is a challenge to the clinician’s ability to discharge that role. What may not have been appreciated is that the reverse situation can also hold true, insofar as the patient cannot validate the clinician as possessing sufficient knowledge and expertise to relieve their pain. In an effort to understand and remediate this impasse, this chapter explores the dynamics of the clinical encounter through the lens of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, and examines the effects on the players when dealing with the aporia of pain. Then, in the novel approach of reframing the field of the clinical encounter through considerations of intersubjectivity, empathy and prospection, ethical possibilities for clinician and patient to achieve mutual validation of their predicaments are canvassed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bourdieu saw the locus of these interactions as being “a competitive struggle in which the specific issue at stake is the monopoly of scientific authority or … the monopoly of scientific competence in the sense of a particular agent’s socially recognised capacity to speak and act legitimately (i.e. in an authorized and authoritative way) in scientific matters.” [p. 20] Substitute “clinical” for “scientific,” and these comments capture the field of the clinical encounter.
References
Abel T, Frohlich KL (2012) Capitals and capabilities: linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities. Soc Sci Med 74:236–244
Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading
Bakhtin M (1963) Problems of Dostoyevsky’s poetics. Khudozhestvennaja literatura, Moscow. English edition: Emerson C (1984) University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Barnes A, Thagard P (1997) Empathy and analogy. Dialogue 36(04):705–720
Blair G (2014) Gayari Chakravorty Spivak: the negotiation of space. Eye Mind IDSVA J Philos Aesthet Art Theory 2. http://www.elputnam.com/eyemind/Blair.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2015
Bourdieu P (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Soc Sci Inform 14(6):19–47
Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport CT, Greenwood, pp 241–258
Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice (trans: Nice R). Stanford University Press, Stanford
Bourdieu P (1994) In other words (trans: M Adamson). Polity Press, Cambridge
Buber M (1958) I and Thou (trans: Ronald Gregor Smith). Charles Scribner and Sons, New York
Budell L, Jackson P, Rainville P (2010) Brain responses to facial expressions of pain: emotional or motor mirroring? Neuroimage 53:355–363
Burbules NC (2000) Aporias, webs and passages: doubt as an opportunity to learn. Curriculum Inquiry 30(2):171–187
Cepeda MS, Chapman CR, Miranda L, Sanchez R, Rodriguez CH, Restrepo AE, Ferrer LM, Linares, RA, Carr DB (2008) Emotional disclosure through patient narrative may improve pain and well-being: results of a randomized controlled trial in patients with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 35:623–632
Collyer FM, Willis KF, Franklin M, Harley K, Short SD (2015) Healthcare choice: Bourdieu’s capital, habitus and field. Curr Sociol. doi:10.1177/0011392115590082
Cohen M, Quintner J, Buchanan D, Nielsen M, Guy L (2011) Stigmatization of patients with chronic pain: the extinction of empathy. Pain Med 12:1637–1643
Crisp R (2015) The social brain. Robinson, London, pp 99–112
Crisp RJ, Turner RN (2012) Imagined intergroup contact. In: Hodson G, Hewstone M (eds) Advances in intergroup contact. Psychology Press (Taylor and Frances), Hove, pp 135–151
Decety J, Michalska KJ, Akitsuki Y, Lahey BB (2009) Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: a functional MRI investigation. Biol Psychol 80:203–222
Derrida J (1993) Aporias (trans: Thomas Dutoit). Stanford University Press, Stanford
Emmerich N (2013) Medical ethics education: an interdisciplinary and social theoretical perspective. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, pp 21–39
Favareau D (2002) Beyond self and other: on the neurosemiotic emergence of intersubjectivity. Sign System Studies 30:57–100
Frank AW (2002) “How can they act like that?” Clinicians and patients as characters in each other’s stories. The Hastings Center Report 32:14–22
Frank AW (2003) How stories remake what pain unmakes. In: Dostrovsky JO, Carr DB, Koltzenburg M (eds) Proceedings of the 10th world congress on pain (progress in pain research and management, vol 24). IASP Press, Seattle, pp 619–630
Frank AW (2004) Ethics as process and practice. Intern Med J 34:355–357
Gallese V, Ferrari PF, Umiltà MA (2002) The mirror matching system: a shared manifold of intersubjectivity. Behav Brain Sci 25:35–36
Gomes AP, Rego S (2013) Pierre Bourdieu and medical education. Rev Bras Educ Méd 37:260–265
Grinnell F (1983) The problem of intersubjectivity: a comparison of Martin Buber and Alfred Schutz. Hum Stud 6:185–195
Gurmin JH (2007) Edith Stein and Tania Singer: a comparison of phenomenological and neurological approaches to the ‘problem of empathy’. In: McDonnell C (ed) Maynooth philosophical papers, Issue 4. National University of Ireland, Maynooth, pp 99–122
Horton R (2003) Second opinion: doctors, diseases and decisions in modern medicine. Granta Books, London, pp 1–64
Lyon P, Cohen ML, Quintner JL (2011) An evolutionary stress-response hypothesis for chronic widespread pain (Fibromyalgia Syndrome). Pain Med 12:1167–1178
Miles E, Crisp RJ (2014) A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Process Intergroup Relat 17:3–26
Moran D (2011) Edmund Husserl’s phenomenon of habituality and habitus. J Br Soc Phenomenol 42:53–77
Navarro Z (2006) In search of a cultural interpretation of power: the contribution of Pierre Bourdieu. IDS Bull 37(6):11–22
Nielsen A (2012) Journeys with chronic pain: acquiring stigma along the way. In: McKenzie H, Quintner J, Bendelow G (eds) At the edge of being: the aporia of pain. Inter-disciplinary Press, Oxford, pp 83–97
Praglin L (2006) The nature of the “in-between” in DW Winnicott’s concept of the transitional space and in Martin Buber’s Zwischenmenschliche. Universitas 2(2). http://www.uni.edu/universitas/archive/fall06/pdf/art_praglin.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2016
Pringle R (1998) Sex and medicine: gender, power and authority in the medical profession. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–127
Quintner JL, Cohen ML, Buchanan D, Katz JD, Williamson OD (2008) Pain medicine and its models: helping or hindering? Pain Med 9:824–834
Robbins JM, Krueger JI (2005) Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9:32–47
Ruthrof H (2014) Language and imaginability. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne
Scarry E (1985) The body in pain: the making and the unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press, New York
Stein E (1917) On the problem of empathy. English edition: Stein W (1989) The collected works of Edith Stein, vol 3. ICS Publications, Washington DC
Takahashi H, Matsuura M, Koeda M, Yahata N, Suhara T, Kato M, Okubo Y (2008) Brain activations during judgments of positive self-conscious emotion and positive basic emotion: pride and joy. Cereb Cortex 18:898–903
Trevarthen C (1979) Pain and mood. In: Wolstenholme G, Oconnor M (eds) Brain and mind. Ciba Foundation 69, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 323–334
Wade DT, Halligan PW (2004) Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? Br Med J 329:1398–1401
Winnicott DW (1971) Playing and reality. Tavistock Publications, London
Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations (trans: Anscombe E). The MacMillan Company, New York
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the valuable insights provided by Horst Ruthrof, FICI FAHA, Emeritus Professor in English and Philosophy at Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quintner, J., Cohen, M. (2016). The Challenge of Validating the Experience of Chronic Pain: The Importance of Intersubjectivity and Reframing. In: van Rysewyk, S. (eds) Meanings of Pain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49022-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49022-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49021-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49022-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)