Skip to main content

Retinal Image Quality Classification Using Saliency Maps and CNNs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (MLMI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10019))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Retinal image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms use different hand crafted features without considering the important role of the human visual system (HVS). We solve the IQA problem using the principles behind the working of the HVS. Unsupervised information from local saliency maps and supervised information from trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are combined to make a final decision on image quality. A novel algorithm is proposed that calculates saliency values for every image pixel at multiple scales to capture global and local image information. This extracts generalized image information in an unsupervised manner while CNNs provide a principled approach to feature learning without the need to define hand-crafted features. The individual classification decisions are fused by weighting them according to their confidence scores. Experimental results on real datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed algorithm over competing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol, 129(4), 687–702, April 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein, E.: Sensation and Perception. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dias, J., Oliveira, C., Cruz, L.: Retinal image quality assessment using generic image quality indicators. Inf. Fusion 19, 73–90 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harel, J., Koch, C., Perona, P.: Graph-based visual saliency. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 545–552 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hou, X., Harel, J., Koch, C.: Image signature: highlighting sparse salient regions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(1), 194–201 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Itti, L., Koch, C., Niebur, E.: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(11), 1254–1259 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pp. 1106–1114 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lalonde, M., Gagnon, L., Boucher, M.: Automatic visual quality assessment in optical fundus images. In: Proceedings of Vision Interface, pp. 259–264 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, S., Wang, Y.: Automatic retinal image quality assessment and enhancement. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 1581–1590 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nair, V., Hinton, G.E.: Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 807–814 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niemeijer, M., Abramoff, M., van Ginneken, B.: Image structure clustering for image quality verification of color retina images in diabetic retinopathy screening. Med. Imag. Anal. 10(6), 888–898 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Palm, R.B.: Prediction as a Candidate for Learning Deep Hierarchical Models of Data. Masters Thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paulus, J., Meier, J., Bock, R., Hornegger, J., Michelson, G.: Automated quality assessment of retinal fundus photos. Int. J. Comp. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 10(6), 888–898 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Usher, D., Himaga, M., Dumskyj, M.: Automated assessment of digital fundus image quality using detected vessel area. In: Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, pp. 81–84 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dwarikanath Mahapatra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mahapatra, D., Roy, P.K., Sedai, S., Garnavi, R. (2016). Retinal Image Quality Classification Using Saliency Maps and CNNs. In: Wang, L., Adeli, E., Wang, Q., Shi, Y., Suk, HI. (eds) Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. MLMI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47156-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47157-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics