Skip to main content

A Treatise of Human Nature, a Treatise of the World?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 399 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 43))

Abstract

My contention is to understand in what manner Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature should be considered: is it a Traité de l’homme or is it a major contribution to modern historical anthropology? I shall emphasize the fact that from Descartes to Hume the problem of what “human nature” is contrasts very strongly. Such contrasts are to be based (1) on the very specific dimension of Hume’s scepticism; (2) on the fact that human nature should be now considered as basically historical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Hume, 2002: A Treatise of Human Nature, Ed. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton, Oxford, 2002, Oxford University Press, Col. « Oxford Philosophical Texts », I.4.7.:177.

  2. 2.

    David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Op. cit.: 4; Emphasises Hume.

  3. 3.

    René Descartes, Méditations métaphysiques, Méditation Seconde, in Œuvres de Descartes, Adam & Tannery eds, Paris, Vrin Librairie Philosophique, Volume IX: 20.

  4. 4.

    John Locke 1998: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Penguin Classics, Book III « Of Words », Section VI « Of the Names of Substances »: 580-s.

  5. 5.

    For Aristotle, the soul had levels: it is nutritive, has sensibility, is imaginative, and finally rational: it is only at this last level that it is human. With Descartes, the soul is one and undividable, and sensibility, imagination and reason are only modes of its essential attribute which is thought. And it only envisaged as human as much as it has sensibility and is affective. Therefore this is not a simple change in the doctrine of man, but a real and total turnaround.

  6. 6.

    A Treatise of Human Nature, Op. cit.: 7-s.

  7. 7.

    A Treatise of Human Nature, Op. cit.: 181-s.

  8. 8.

    A Treatise of Human Nature, Op. cit.: 293-s.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Gautier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gautier, C. (2016). A Treatise of Human Nature, a Treatise of the World?. In: Antoine-Mahut, D., Gaukroger, S. (eds) Descartes’ Treatise on Man and its Reception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46989-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46989-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46987-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46989-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics