Skip to main content

Reachability Predicates for Graph Assertions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reachability Problems (RP 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9899))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 343 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce a logic-based formalism to specify updates on arbitrary graphs. For the resulting language called GLog, we introduce an assertional language for reasoning about infinite sets of graph configurations in which we use reachability predicates to specify paths of arbitrary length. For the considered assertional language and a restricted class of update rules, we define a symbolic procedure to compute predecessor configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bardin, S., Finkel, A., Leroux, J., Petrucci, L.: FAST: acceleration from theory to practice. STTT 10(5), 401–424 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertrand, N., Delzanno, G., König, B., Sangnier, A., Stückrath, J.: On the decidability status of reachability and coverability in graph transformation systems. In: 23rd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2012), Nagoya, Japan, 28 May – 2 June 2012, pp. 101–116 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouajjani, A., Dragoi, C., Enea, C., Jurski, Y., Sighireanu, M.: A generic framework for reasoning about dynamic networks of in nite-state processes. Logical Methods Comput. Sci. 5(2), 1–29 (2009). http://arxiv.org/pdf/0903.3126.pdf

  4. Das, S., Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E.: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delzanno, G.: A logic-based approach to verify distributed protocols. To appear in the Proceedings of CILC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delzanno, G., Sangnier, A., Traverso, R., Zavattaro, G.: On the complexity of parameterized reachability in recongurable broadcast networks. In: IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, FSTTCS 2012, Hyderabad, India, 15–17 December 2012, pp. 289–300 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, E.A., Namjoshi, K.S.: On model checking for non-deterministic in nite-state systems. In: Thirteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 21–24 June 1998, pp. 70–80 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fioravanti, F., Pettorossi, A., Proietti, M., Senni, V.: Improving reachability analysis of in nite state systems by specialization. Fundam. Inform. 119(3–4), 281–300 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. German, S.M., Sistla, A.P.: Reasoning about systems with many processes. J. ACM 39(3), 675–735 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghamarian, A.H., de Mol, M., Rensink, A., Zambon, E., Zimakova, M.: Modelling and analysis using groove. STTT 14(1), 15–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. König, B., Kozioura, V.: Augur 2 - a new version of a tool for the analysis of graph transformation systems. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 211, 201–210 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, R., Strazny, T.: Petruchio: from dynamic networks to nets. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 175–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Namjoshi, K.S., Trefler, R.J.: Uncovering symmetries in irregular process networks. In: Giacobazzi, R., Berdine, J., Mastroeni, I. (eds.) VMCAI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7737, pp. 496–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Stückrath, J.: Uncover: using coverability analysis for verifying graph transformation systems. In: Parisi-Presicce, F., Westfechtel, B. (eds.) ICGT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9151, pp. 266–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. https://github.com/pierreganty/mist/

  16. http://users.mat.unimi.it/users/ghilardi/mcmt/

  17. http://www.it.uu.se/research/docs/fm/apv/tools/pfs/

  18. http://www.it.uu.se/research/docs/fm/apv/tools/undip/

  19. http://www.liafa.jussieu.fr/~sighirea/trex/

  20. http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/Software/fast/

  21. http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~boigelot/research/lash/

  22. http://www.ti.inf.uni-due.de/de/research/tools/uncover/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Delzanno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delzanno, G. (2016). Reachability Predicates for Graph Assertions. In: Larsen, K., Potapov, I., Srba, J. (eds) Reachability Problems. RP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45994-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45994-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45994-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics