Abstract
In this paper we show how the Belief-Function based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (BF-TOPSIS) approach can be used for solving non-classical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. We give simple examples to illustrate our presentation.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Analytic hierarchy process.
- 2.
Elimination and choice translating reality.
- 3.
Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution.
- 4.
In the MCDM context, a source of information consists in the list of scores values of alternatives related to a given criterion.
- 5.
The power set \(2^\mathcal {A}\) is the set of all subsets of \(\mathcal {A}\), empty set \(\emptyset \) and \(\mathcal {A}\) included.
- 6.
As proposed in Smets Transferable Belief Model for instance.
- 7.
Depending on the context of the MCDM problem, the score can be interpreted either as a cost/expense or as a reward/benefit. In the sequel, by convention and without loss of generality, we will interpret the score as a reward having monotonically increasing preference. Thus, the best alternative with respect to a given criterion will be the one providing the highest reward/benefit.
- 8.
Indeed, \(Bel_{ij}(X_i)\) and \(Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)\) (where \(\bar{X}_i\) is the complement of \(X_i\) in the FoD \(\mathcal {A}\)) belong to [0, 1] and they are consistent because the equality \(Pl_{ij}(X_i)=1-Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)\) holds. The proof is similar to the one given in [11].
- 9.
If \(X^j_{\max }=0\) then \(Bel_{ij}(X_i)=0\), and if \(X^j_{\min }=0\) then \(Pl_{ij}(X_i)=1\), so that \(Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)=0\).
- 10.
When a score value is missing for some proposition \(X_i\) (i.e. if \(S_j(X_i)= \varnothing \)), then we take the vacuous BBA \(m_{ij}(X_i\cup \bar{X}_i)=1\).
- 11.
References
Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M., Batton-Hubert, M., Smarandache, F.: Multi-criteria decision making based on DSmT/AHP. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Belief Functions, Brest, France (2010)
Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Evidential reasoning for multi-criteria analysis based on DSmT-AHP. In: Proceedings of the ISAHP 2011, Italy (2011)
Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Batton-Hubert, M.: AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology. In: Proceedings of the ISAHP 2011, Italy (2011)
Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: Multi-criteria decision making method with belief preference relations. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. (IJUFKS) 22(4), 573–590 (2014)
Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: Belief AHP method: AHP method with the belief function framework. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making (IJITDM) 15(3), 553–573 (2016)
Wang, X., Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega 36(1), 45–63 (2008)
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981)
Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y., Hwang, C.L.: TOPSIS for MODM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76(3), 486–500 (1994)
Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Soft ELECTRE TRI outranking method based on belief functions. In: Proceedings of the 15th Fusion Conference, Singapore (2012)
Dezert, J., Han, D., Yin, H.: A new belief function based approach for multi-criteria decision-making support. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Fusion Conference, Heidelberg, Germany (2016)
Carladous, S., Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Han, D., Batton-Hubert, M.: Evaluation of efficiency of torrential protective structures with new BF-TOPSIS methods. In: Proceedings of the 19th Fusion Conference, Heidelberg, Germany (2016)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Han, D., Dezert, J., Yang, Y.: New distance measures of evidence based on belief intervals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Belief International Conference, Oxford (2014)
Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, J.-M., Carladous, S., Yang, Y.: Decision-making with belief interval distance. In: Proceedings of the 4th Belief International Conference, Prague, Czech Republic (2016)
Irpino, A., Verde, R.: Dynamic clustering of interval data using a wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29, 1648–1658 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, JM., Carladous, S., Yin, H. (2016). The BF-TOPSIS Approach for Solving Non-classical MCDM Problems. In: Vejnarová, J., Kratochvíl, V. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9861. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45558-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45559-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)