Skip to main content

Open Innovation and the Core of the Engineer’s Domain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Engineering

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 26))

Abstract

Engineering as a professional domain is usually understood as the driving force of innovation. Recently, however, various forms of open innovation have become popular that do not necessarily require engineers as contributors. How does this affect the conception of the engineer? This paper assumes that open innovation proceeds as an evolutionary process. Computational models show that such processes need careful design. Even if engineers do not appear explicitly in open innovation, they can nevertheless be considered as parts of it, inasmuch as they provide the framework in which technical progress becomes possible. The engineer’s domain should therefore not be understood as a closed sphere containing innovation, but rather as a surface organizing the environment in ways that makes it possible to address change as innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, R. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barandiaran, X., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, K. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17(4), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, A. C., Rass, M., Adamczyk, S., Möslein, K. M., & Sohn, S. (2012). Open innovation in health care: Analysis of an open health platform. Health Policy, 105(2–3), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (Vol. I, pp. 413–463). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, A. (2014). Cross-fertilization vs. Collaboration in simulations of open innovation. Proceedings of the international symposium on open collaboration (OpenSym’14). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamm, G. (1998). Technik als Medium. Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. In M. Hauskeller, C. Rehmann-Sutter, & G. Schiemann (Eds.), Naturerkenntnis und Natursein (pp. 94–106). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. (2002). The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993). Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubig, C. (2006). Die Kunst des Möglichen I. Technikphilosophie als Reflexion der Medialität. Braunschweig: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2000). Brunelleschi’s dome: The story of the great cathedral in Florence. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1) 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J., Corne, D., & Deb, K. (Eds.). (2007). Multiobjective problem solving from nature: From concepts to applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K. (2013). Contributions by developers. In A. Huff, K. Moeslein, & R. Reichwald (Eds.), Leading open innovation (pp. 155–170). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindegaard, S. (2010). The open innovation revolution: Essentials, roadblocks, and leadership skills. Hoboke: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, J. C. (1836). Miscellaneous notices respecting the competition designs for the new houses of parliament. Architectural Magazine, 3, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möslein, K. (2013). Open innovation: Actors, tools and tensions. In A. Huff, K. Möslein, & R. Reichwald (Eds.), Leading open innovation (pp. 69–86). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuvolari, A. (2004). Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The case of the Cornish Pumping Engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot (Reprint 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1995). Longitude: The true story of a Lone Genius who solved the greatest scientific problem of his time. New York: Walker and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why ‘open innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Delden, K., & Wuenderlich, N. (2013). Viral marketing on facebook for a new open innovation platform. In A. Huff, K. Möslein, & R. Reichwald (Eds.), Leading open innovation (pp. 221–240). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(3), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albrecht Fritzsche .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fritzsche, A. (2017). Open Innovation and the Core of the Engineer’s Domain. In: Michelfelder, D., Newberry, B., Zhu, Q. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45193-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics