Skip to main content

Solution-Oriented Versus Novelty-Oriented Leadership Instructions: Cognitive Effect on Creative Ideation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The generation of novel ideas is critical to any innovative endeavor. However, one of the key obstacles to creativity is known as the fixation effect, which is the cognitive effect that constrains the generation of novel ideas due to the spontaneous activation of existing knowledge and solutions in individuals’ mind. Expert leaders have been considered to play an important role in overcoming these biases using diverse tools. One of these principal instruments is task instruction. Our hypothesis is that leaders’ instructions can have significant effects on followers’ ideation capacity . We investigated the effect of an instruction given by a leader to his team to generate as many original ideas to a particular creative task, either using solution or novelty-oriented approaches. Results confirmed that solution-oriented instructions activated knowledge bases in fixation, while solution-oriented instructions inhibited these knowledge bases. These results give us new sights into novel models of “less-expert” creative leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agogué M et al (2014) The impact of type of examples on originality: explaining fixation and stimulation effects. J Creative Behav 48(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alʹtšuller GS (1999) The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center Inc., Worcester

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: acomponential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol 45(2):357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1997) Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif Manag Rev 40(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile T, Gryskiewicz SS (1987) Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Center for Creative Leadership

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden R et al (2003) A review of leadership theory and competency frameworks. University of Exeter, Centre for Leadership Studies, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungardt C (1997) The making of leaders: a review of the research in leadership development and education. J Leadersh Organ Stud 3(3):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JM (1978) Leadership. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr A, Tomasco S (2010) The most important leadership quality for CEOs? Creativity. Fast Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson PP, Carson KD (1993) Managing creativity enhancement through goal-setting and feedback*. J Creative Behav 27(1):36–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chemers M (2014) An integrative theory of leadership. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft R (2014) The leadership experience. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP (1959) Traits of creativity. Creativity Cultiv 10:142–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2002) CK theory. In: Proceedings of the Herbert Simon international conference on design sciences. Citeseer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to CK theory. In: DS 31 Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th international conference on engineering design, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B (2009) Design theory and collective creativity: a theoretical framework to evaluate KCP process. In: International conference on engineering design, ICED

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin S, Allwood CM, Martin BR (2008) Creative knowledge environments. Creat Res J 20(2):196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House R.J (1971) A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 16(3):321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung DI (2001) Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Res J 13(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowaltowski DC, Bianchi G, De Paiva VT (2010) Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. Int J Technol Des Educ 20(4):453–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JS, Goncalo JA, Kamdar D (2011) Recognizing creative leadership: can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential? J Exp Soc Psychol 47(2):494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD et al (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadersh Q 13(6):705–750

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Connelly S, Gaddis B (2003) How creative leaders think: experimental findings and cases. Leadersh Q 14(4):411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon R, Illies JJ (2004) Leadership and creativity: understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. Leadersh Q 15(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickards T, Moger S (2000) Creative leadership processes in project team development: an alternative to Tuckman’s stage model. Br J Manag 11(4):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA, Okuda S (1991) The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Appl Cogn Psychol 5(5):435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA, Illies JJ, Eisenman R (2005a) Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: what do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships? J Creative Behav 39(2):137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA, Illies JJ, Reiter-Ralmon R (2005b) Explicit instructions to be creative and original. Int J Creativity Probl Solving 15(1):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE (1995) Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Acad Manag J 38(2):483–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE, Gilson LL (2004) What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadersh Q 15(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Kaufman JC, Pretz JE (2003) A propulsion model of creative leadership. Leadersh Q 14(4):455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill RM (1974) Handbook of leadership: a survey of the literature. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Seters DA, Field RH (1990) The evolution of leadership theory. J Organ Change Manag 3(3):29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward TB, Patterson MJ, Sifonis CM (2004) The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Res J 16(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wofford J, Goodwin VL (1994) A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. Leadersh Q 5(2):161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl GA (1994) Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, George JM (2003) Awakening employee creativity: the role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadersh Q 14(4):545–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financed by a grant from the French National Research Agency (project ANR-13-SOIN-0004-04 IDéfixE). The authors would like to thank Sophie Hooge for giving us the opportunity to run these experiments during her course “Products Design and Innovation”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hicham Ezzat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ezzat, H., Agogué, M., Le Masson, P., Weil, B. (2017). Solution-Oriented Versus Novelty-Oriented Leadership Instructions: Cognitive Effect on Creative Ideation. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44988-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44989-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics