Skip to main content

A Boundary Practice Perspective on Co-creation of ICT Innovations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Nordic Contributions in IS Research (SCIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

Research has shown that collaboration and co-creation among different groups of stakeholders add complexity and challenges to the innovation process. In this paper a study of co-creation in a multi-stakeholder innovation process is presented. The co-creation is explored and described from a boundary practice perspective. The empirical data presented in the study is based on a user-centric innovation project, Free2Ride, where researchers, developers and members of two equestrian clubs co-created a piece of ICT safety equipment consisting of a transmitter (on the horse) and a receiver (application on a smartphone) to be used by equestrian club members during their everyday riding activities. Three episodes were extracted from the empirical data and presented in the paper. From these episodes the researchers have identified four characteristics of the spanning of boundaries in co-creation from a boundary practice perspective. One of the contributions in the papers is a description of boundary practice-spanning. The research approach adopted in the study is the action case approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S.: State-of-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation - a European approach (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doolin, B., McLeod, L.: Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. 2012(21), 570–586 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesbrough, H.: The era of open innovation. In: Mayle, D. (ed.) Managing Innovation and Change. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (eds.): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loebbecke, C., Powell, P.: Furthering distributed participative design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 21(1), 77–106 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ståhlbröst, A.: Living lab an open and user-centric design approach. In: Information and Communication Technologies, Society and Human Beings: Theory and Framework (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akkerman, S.F., Bakker, A.: Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Rev. Educ. Res. 81(2), 132–169 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vashist, R., McKay, J., Marshall, P.: How well do we understand boundary practices? Empirical evidence from a practice of business analysts. In: ECIS 2011, Helsinki (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hippel, E.V.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chesbrough, H.: Open Service Innovation. Wiley, New York (2011). Ed. by Mayle, D.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., et al.: A milieu for innovation – defining living labs. In: ISPIM 2009, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hippel, E.V.: Horizontal innovation networks–by and for users. In: Industrial and Corporate Change. Oxford University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hippel, E.V.: Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. für Betriebswirtschaft 55(1), 63–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ståhlbröst, A.: Forming future IT - the living lab way of user involvement. Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kyng, M.: Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design. Commun. ACM 34(12), 30–34 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kensing, F., Simonsen, J., Boedker, K.: MUST: a method for participatory design. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 13, 167–198 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Piller, F., Ihl, C., Vossen, A.: A typology of customer co-creation in the innovation process. In: Hanekop, H., Wittke, V. (eds.) New Forms of Collaborate Production and Innovation: Economic, Social, Legal. Technical Characteristics and Conditions. Lichtenberg kolleg, Goettingen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy Leaders. 32(3), 4–9 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grover, V., Kohli, R.: Cocreating IT value: new capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Q. 36(1), 225–232 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prahalad, C., Ramaswamy, V.: The co-creation connection. Strategy Bus. 27, 50–61 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Senge, P.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Broadway Business, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 18(3), 5–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Avital, M., Lyytinen, K.: Track: Innovation Theory, Research and Practice in Information Systems (2010). http://www.ecis2011.fi/program/conference-tracks/innovation-theory-research-and-practice-in-information-systems/index.html. Cited 29 Nov 2010

  27. Orlikowski, W.J.: Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 249–273 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R., Snyder, W.M.: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: a brief introduction (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 40–57 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cook, S.D.N., Brown, J.S.: Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. 10(4), 381–400 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The emergence of boundary spanning competence: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q. 29(2), 29 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johansson, L.-O., Snis, U.L., Svensson, L.: Dynamics in an innovation boundary context: exploring a living lab process from a community of practice perspective. In: Molka-Danielsen, J. (ed.) Selected Papers of the 34th IRIS Seminar. Tapir Press, Molde (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Star, S.: The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35(5), 601–617 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pawlowski, S., Robey, D.: Bridging user organizations: knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Q. 28(4), 645–672 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Q. 21(2), 241 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Braa, K., Vidgen, R.: Action case: exploring the middle kingdom in information system research methods. In: 3rd Decennial Conference on Computers in Context: Joining Forces in Design, Aarhus, Denmark (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vidgen, R.: Balancing interpretation and intervention in information system research: the action case approach. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research. IFIP, pp. 524–541. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mingers, J.: Combining is research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(3), 240–259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schein, E.H.: The Clinical Perspective in Fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods Series. SAGE Publications, Thousands Oaks (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Vashist, R., McKay, J., Marshall, P.: The roles and practices of business analysts: a boundary practice perspective. In: Australasian Conference in Information Systems (ACIS 2010), Brisbane (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vashist, R., McKay, J., Marshall, P.: A framework to support the planning and implementation of work practice research: an example of using boundary practice lens on the work of business analysts. Syst. Signs Actions: Int. J. Commun. Inf. Technol. Work 5(1), 30–66 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Senge, P., et al.: The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. Random House, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars-Olof Johansson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johansson, LO., Snis, U.L., Svensson, L. (2016). A Boundary Practice Perspective on Co-creation of ICT Innovations. In: Lundh Snis, U. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43597-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics