Skip to main content

The Ambivalent Characteristics of Connected, Digitised Products: Case Tesla Model S

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Nordic Contributions in IS Research (SCIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Connected, digitised products are assemblages that comprise digital and physical components and are linked to digital support infrastructures. Given that re-programmability of digital components allows a product designer to adopt a design philosophy that embraces incompleteness and continuous improvement, digitised (tangible) products may also become incomplete and open-ended if such a philosophy is embraced. This research uses Tesla Model S as a case study to explore the mutability of a passenger car over time. The results show that a type of a product that has traditionally been seen as stable may become open-ended, incomplete and mutable in terms of its specifications and functionality. This brings forward the relevance of complementary architectural frames and principles to conceptualise differing design cycles among physical and digital components in innovation and product management while also showing blurring boundaries of control between the owner and the manufacturer of a product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.teslamotorsclub.com.

  2. 2.

    http://www.teslamotors.com.

  3. 3.

    http://www.teslarati.com.

References

  1. Attride-Stirling, J.: Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual. Res. 1(3), 385–405 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett, M., et al.: Reconfiguring boundary relations: robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1448–1466 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eaton, B., et al.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q. 39(1), 217–243 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fichman, R.G., et al.: Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Q. 38(2), 329–353 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garud, R., Jain, S., Tuertscher, P.: Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. 29(3), 351–371 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B.: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 9–30 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henfridsson, O., et al.: Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames. J. Inf. Technol. 29(1), 27–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarrahi, M.H.: Digital and physical materiality of information technologies: the case of fitbit activity tracking devices. Presented at the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kallinikos, J., et al.: The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q. 37(2), 357–370 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lessig, L.: Code - Version 2.0. Basic Books, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muffatto, M.: Introducing a platform strategy in product development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 60–61, 145–153 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Teece, D.J., et al.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilson, D., et al.: Research commentary—digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 748–759 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaast, E., et al.: Talking about technology: the emergence of a new actor category through new media. MIS Q. 37(4), 1069–1092 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. Sage, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo, Y.: The tables have turned: how can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(5), 227–236 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo, Y., et al.: Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1398–1408 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zittrain, J.: The Future of the Internet-And How to Stop It. Yale University Press, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by research student grants that were made available by the Emil Aaltonen foundation and the KAUTE foundation (the Finnish Science Foundation for Economics and Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antti K. Lyyra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lyyra, A.K., Koskinen, K.M. (2016). The Ambivalent Characteristics of Connected, Digitised Products: Case Tesla Model S. In: Lundh Snis, U. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43597-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics