Skip to main content

Mechanical Verification of a Constructive Proof for FLP

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9807))

Abstract

The impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process is a result with important consequences for real world distributed systems e.g., commits in replicated databases. Since proofs are not immune to faults and even plausible proofs with a profound formalism can conclude wrong results, we validate the fundamental result named FLP after Fischer, Lynch and Paterson by using the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. We present a formalization of distributed systems and the aforementioned consensus problem. Our proof is based on Hagen Völzer’s paper A constructive proof for FLP. In addition to the enhanced confidence in the validity of Völzer’s proof, we contribute the missing gaps to show the correctness in Isabelle/HOL. We clarify the proof details and even prove fairness of the infinite execution that contradicts consensus. Our Isabelle formalization may serve as a starting point for similar proofs of properties of distributed systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/ConsensusResearch/flp.

References

  1. Bertot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development: Coq’Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science An EATCS Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisping, B., Brodmann, P.D., Jungnickel, T., Rickmann, C., Seidler, H., Stüber, A., Wilhelm-Weidner, A., Peters, K., Nestmann, U.: A Constructive Proof for FLP. Archive of Formal Proofs (2016). http://isa-afp.org/entries/FLP.shtml. Formal proof development

  3. Buckley, G.N., Silberschatz, A.: An effective implementation for the generalized input-output construct of CSP. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. (TOPLAS) 5(2), 223–235 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Constable, R.L.: Effectively Nonblocking Consensus Procedures can Execute Forever - a Constructive Version of FLP. Tech. Rep. 11513, Cornell University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Constable, R.L., Allen, S.F., Bromley, H.M., Cleaveland, W.R., Cremer, J.F., Harper, R.W., Howe, D.J., Knoblock, T.B., Mendler, N.P., Panangaden, P., Sasaki, J.T., Smith, S.F.: Implementig Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM (JACM) 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kammüller, F., Wenzel, M., Paulson, L.C.: Locales - a sectioning concept for Isabelle. In: Bertot, Y., Dowek, G., Hirschowitz, A., Paulin, C., Théry, L. (eds.) TPHOLs 1999. LNCS, vol. 1690, pp. 149–165. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Küfner, P., Nestmann, U., Rickmann, C.: Formal verification of distributed algorithms. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Ball, T., de Boer, F.S. (eds.) TCS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7604, pp. 209–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, D., Silberschatz, A.: A counter-example to an algorithm for the generalized input-output construct of CSP. Inform. Proc. Lett. 61(6), 287 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamport, L.: The part-time parliament. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. (TOCS) 16(2), 133–169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C., Wenzel, M. (eds.): Isabelle/HOL: A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic. LNCS, vol. 2283. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ongaro, D., Ousterhout, J.: In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm. In: Proceedings of USENIX, pp. 305–320 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Völzer, H.: A constructive proof for FLP. Inform. Proc. Lett. 92(2), 83–87 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Nestmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bisping, B. et al. (2016). Mechanical Verification of a Constructive Proof for FLP. In: Blanchette, J., Merz, S. (eds) Interactive Theorem Proving. ITP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43144-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43144-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43143-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43144-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics