Chapter

Nutrition in Lifestyle Medicine

Part of the series Nutrition and Health pp 103-116

Date:

Critical Evaluation of Nutrition Research

  • Andrew W. BrownAffiliated withOffice of Energetics and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Email author 
  • , Michelle M. Bohan BrownAffiliated withFood, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences Department, Clemson University

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

Despite the increasing focus placed on the importance of nutrition for optimal health, nutrition as a science is often criticized in lay media and casual conversation as constantly conflicting with itself, and experts ridiculed for seeming to change their minds. Although there is much that is uncertain about the effects of foods on health, the seeming contradictions can come from misunderstandings of nutrition science. This chapter is designed to be a primer for readers of scientific literature to identify some of the challenges in evaluating what was studied, determining how it was studied, and interpreting what we can conclude from studies. In this chapter, we will consider: challenges in defining exposures and outcomes, oversimplification of complex concepts, differences in causal inference from a variety of study designs, surrogate and hard endpoints, bias, confounding, letting data speak, logical fallacies, and the differences between scientific conclusions and evidence-based decisions. The points discussed herein should help the reader to look at nutrition research with a more critical and discerning eye, which will aid in distinguishing between when scientific findings disagree and when the studies are actually asking distinct questions.

Keywords

Nutrition Research reporting Scientific integrity Scientific rigor Study design