Abstract
In the previous chapter we considered the shape of steady state condensates, either homogeneous or confined by trapping potentials. We have seen that the condensate described by the GPE is a special kind of fluid, similar to the idealized Euler fluid without viscosity that appears in classical fluid dynamics textbooks. Not surprisingly for a fluid, the dynamics of the condensate exhibit a variety of interesting time-dependent phenomena, from sound waves and shape oscillations, to solitons and vortices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We write the amplitude of the second term as \(B^*\) rather than B for mathematical convenience.
- 2.
The phase velocity of a wave is the rate at which its phase propagates in space.
- 3.
If a harmonic potential is included, then a positive \(x^2\) term is added to \(E(\ell )/N\) which then does support an energy minimum, representing the ground trapped condensate.
- 4.
The superposition theorem does not apply to the GPE since it is a nonlinear equation; constructing a superposition is only a valid approximation if the density is low. This condition is satisfied here since we are concerned with the weak overlap between well-separated solitons.
References
M.R. Andrews et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 553 (1997)
Y. Castin, R. Dum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5315 (1996)
M.-O. Mewes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 416 (1996)
T. Dauxois, M. Peyrard, Physics of Solitons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)
M.J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981)
P.G. Drazin, R.S. Johnson, Solitons: An Introduction, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)
D.J. Frantzeskakis, J. Phys. A 43, 213001 (2010)
Th Busch, J.R. Anglin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2298 (2000)
S. Burger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5198 (1999)
J. Denschlag et al., Science 287, 97 (2000)
C. Becker et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 496 (2008)
S. Stellmer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 120406 (2008)
A. Weller et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130401 (2008)
J. Brand, W.P. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. A 65, 043612 (2002)
T.P. Billam, A.L. Marchant, S.L. Cornish, S.A. Gardiner, N.G. Parker, Bright solitary matter waves: formation, stability and interactions, in Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Self-Trapping and Josephson Oscillations, ed. by B.A. Malomed (Springer, Berlin, 2013)
K.E. Strecker, G.B. Partridge, A.G. Truscott, R.G. Hulet, Nature 417, 150 (2002)
L. Khaykovich et al., Science 296, 1290 (2002)
J.H.V. Nguyen, P. Dyke, D. Luo, B.A. Malomed, R.G. Hulet, Nat. Phys. 10, 918 (2014)
A.L. Marchant, T.P. Billam, T.P. Wiles, M.M.H. Yu, S.A. Gardiner, S.L. Cornish, Nat. Commun. 4, 1865 (2013)
P. Nozieres, D. Pines, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Perseus Books, Cambridge, 1999)
S. Serafini, M. Barbiero, M. Debortoli, S. Donadello, F. Larcher, F. Dalfovo, G.Lamporesi, G. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 170402 (2015)
F. Dalfovo, Dynamics of trapped Bose-condensed gases in mean-field theory. in Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Atomic Gases, ed. by M. Inguscio, S. Stringari, C.E. Wieman (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999)
L.P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation. International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Problems
Problems
4.1
For a dark soliton, the integrals of motion in Eqs. (4.35)–(4.37) are renormalized so as to remove the contribution from the background and lead to finite values,
Evaluate these integrals using the dark soliton solution Eq. (4.38), leaving your answers in terms of \(\xi , n_0, u\) and c.
4.2
Consider a dark soliton in a harmonically-trapped condensate. Approximating the background condensate with the Thomas–Fermi profile \(n(x)=n_0(1-x^2/R_x^2)\) (for \(x \le R_x\), otherwise \(n=0\)) and treating the soliton depth \(n_\mathrm{d}\) to be constant, obtain an expression for the soliton speed as a function of its position x and depth \(n_\mathrm{d}\). Hence obtain an expression for the turning points of its motion.
4.3
Show that the static (\(u=0\)) bright soliton solution, obtained from Eq. (4.52), is a solution to the 1D attractive time-independent GPE with \(V(x)=0\), i.e.,
and hence determine an expression for the chemical potential of the soliton.
4.4
Using the general bright soliton solution, Eq. (4.52), evaluate the soliton integrals of motion according to Eqs. (4.35)–(4.37). The soliton solution is already normalized to the number of atoms, N. Show that the bright soliton behaves as a classical particle with positive mass.
4.5
Consider a 3D bright soliton in a cylindrically-symmetric waveguide with tight harmonic confinement (of frequency \(\omega _r\)) in r and no trapping along z. We can construct the ansatz for the soliton,
where \(l_r=\sqrt{\hbar /m \omega _r}\) is the harmonic oscillator length in the radial plane and \(\sigma _r\) and \(\sigma _z\) are the dimensionless variational length parameters.
-
(a)
Normalize the ansatz to N atoms to show that \(A=(N/2 \pi l_r^3 \sigma _r^2 \sigma _z)\).
-
(b)
Show that the variational energy of this ansatz is,
$$\begin{aligned} E = \hbar \omega _r N \left( \frac{1}{6 \sigma _z^2} + \frac{1}{2 \sigma _r^2} + \frac{\sigma _r^2}{2} + \frac{\gamma }{3 \sigma _r^2 \sigma _z}\right) , \end{aligned}$$(4.64)where \(\gamma = N a_\mathrm{s}/l_r\).
-
(c)
Make a 2D plot of the variational energy per particle, \(E/N\hbar \omega _r\) (scaled by the transverse harmonic energy) as a function of the two variational length parameters, and plot this for \(\gamma =-0.5\). Locate the variational solution in this 2D “energy landscape”. Repeat for \(\gamma =-1\); what happens to the variational solution? By varying \(\gamma \) estimate the critical value at which the solutions no longer exist (and they become prone to collapse).
4.6
Consider an object of mass M moving at velocity \(\mathbf{v}_i\) which creates an excitation of energy E and momentum \(\mathbf{p}=\hbar \mathbf{k}\). Show that Landau’s critical velocity, \(v_c=\mathrm{min}(E/p)\), is equivalent to \(dE/dp=E/p\). Compare Landau’s critical velocity for the ideal gas (dispersion relation \(E(p)=p^2/2M\)) against the weakly-interacting Bose gas. Finally show that in liquid helium II, Landau’s critical velocity is \(v_c\approx 60~\mathrm{m/s}\). Hint: assume that near the roton minimum the dispersion relation, shown in Fig. 4.1b, has the approximate form \(E(p)=\varDelta _0 +(p-p_0)^2/(2 \mu _0)\) where (at very low pressure) \(\varDelta _0=1.20 \times 10^{-22}~\mathrm{J}\) is the energy gap, \(p_0=\hbar k_0=2.02 \times 10^{-24}~\mathrm{kg~m/s}\) is the momentum at the roton minimum, \(\mu _0=0.161~m_4\) is the effective roton mass, and \(m_4=6.65 \times 10^{-27}~\mathrm{kg}\) is the mass of one \(^4\)He atom.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barenghi, C.F., Parker, N.G. (2016). Waves and Solitons. In: A Primer on Quantum Fluids. SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42476-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42476-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42474-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42476-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)